PubMed · 9818321
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
I Kremer, M Blumenthal. 1998. Focal or diffuse PTK?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80149-1
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We describe a new surgical technique of microkeratome-assisted deep lamellar keratoplasty for treating patients with corneal stromal disease and normal endothelium. A microkeratome is used to create a hinged anterior stromal flap in the host cornea, and the diseased stroma is resected or ablated. A complementary donor stromal button, prepared using a microkeratome and an artificial anterior chamber, is transplanted prior to repositioning of the flap. The flap may be lifted at a later date, and an excimer laser used to correct residual refractive errors. Notwithstanding the preliminary and theoretical nature of this report, this technique may improve the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and may allow for decreased postoperative complications. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1112-1115
PURPOSE: During the past 4 years we have demonstrated in eyes with corneal pathology that applanation tonometry (Goldmann, Perkins) generally delivers falsely low measurements in comparison to intraocular needle tonometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether impression tonometry (Schioetz) is more precise than applanation tonometry in determining the intraocular pressure in eyes with corneal disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 75 eyes with suspected glaucoma and various corneal disorders, we performed applanation tonometry and impression tonometry before intraocular needle tonometry. Applanation tonometry was repeated after impression tonometry to unveil a possible tonography effect. Intraocular needle tonometry was performed thereafter. RESULTS: Applanation tonometry results were 4.1 +/- 5.3 mmHg below intraocular pressure as determined by intraocular needle tonometry. Impression tonometry results were also lower: 4.3 +/- 6.8 mmHg (5.5 g), 4.3 +/- 6.4 mmHg (7.5 g), and 4.8 +/- 7.0 mmHg (10.0 g). The differences between applanation tonometry and impression tonometry were statistically not significant. In contrast, all the differences between extraocular tonometry procedures and intraocular needle tonometry were statistically highly significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In corneal pathology both, applanation tonometry and impression tonometry do not deliver reliable results on an average. Only intraocular needle-tonometry delivers reliable results in these eyes.
PURPOSE: To report the incidence and risk factors for clinically significant epithelial ingrowth after laser in situ keratomileusis as well as the recurrence rate and visual outcomes after its treatment. METHODS: We defined clinically significant epithelial ingrowth as that which required surgical removal. From a cohort of 3, 786 eyes that underwent primary laser in situ keratomileusis from February 1996 to August 1998 and its derivative of 480 eyes that later underwent enhancement laser in situ keratomileusis by one surgeon (R.K.M.), we identified all eyes with clinically significant epithelial ingrowth. RESULTS: The incidence of significant epithelial ingrowth after primary treatment was 35 (0.92%) of 3,786 eyes. The incidence after enhancement treatment was eight (1.7%) of 480 eyes (p = NS). Fourteen of 43 eyes had a postoperative epithelial defect associated with subsequent development of epithelial ingrowth. Six of 43 eyes had loose epithelium intraoperatively, suggesting epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. Epithelial ingrowth was treated by lifting the flap, scraping the bed and the posterior surface of the flap, and replacing the flap without the use of caustic agents. In 42 of 43 eyes, the epithelial ingrowth under the flap was continuous with the surface epithelium. Clinically significant ingrowth recurred in 10 of 43 eyes after the initial surgical removal. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant epithelial ingrowth is an infrequent complication of laser in situ keratomileusis. We hypothesize that epithelial ingrowth is secondary to postoperative invasion under the flap by surface epithelial cells rather than intraoperative implantation of epithelial cells. Treatment should consist of complete mechanical removal of epithelium from the posterior surface of the corneal flap and keratectomy bed and ensuring tight apposition of the flap with the bed.