Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9816566

Chart documentation: far reaching concerns.

Abstract

The documentation of patient care is a critical nursing function. In addition to confirming that the nurse has practiced within the standards of care, the documentation is intensely scrutinized by those making payment and legal decisions. With the stroke of a pen or the tap of a keyboard the nurse records a fact or observation that will forever be a part of the data base. That data base may be used to determine benefits, allocate resources, settle legal arguments and even weigh criminal justice. Charting on the patient's record is both a privilege and a responsibility. It is not to be taken lightly. Every effort should be made to write from the perspective of a neutral reporter. The scope of documentation should be comprehensive and relevant. Observations should include the realms of psychosocial and emotional concerns as well as the physical. It is not necessary to make judgements or draw conclusions about the observations charted. It is enough to record pertinent assessments, actions and outcomes. It is from a database with these characteristics that we may be assured we are practicing in an ethical and responsible manner.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S H Wisser. 1998. Chart documentation: far reaching concerns.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01376517-199810000-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Retained foreign bodies from the view of the OR nurse].

Patient safety in the operating room is of high priority for the surgical team and for all healthcare workers involved. Counting procedures contribute to minimizing potential risks for the patients, especially in preventing them from leaving the operating room with retained, unintended foreign bodies. A total of 64% of operating room nurses involved in a survey are reported as having been involved in a surgical procedure in which the correct count prevented foreign bodies from being left in the patient. In addition, the strengths and potential weak points of the counting procedures could be identified. The results of the survey and drafts for a standard counting control as well as procedural recommendations are presented for discussion. A recommendation can be provided for each surgical department in order to check their own counting methods for avoiding potential risks.

Documentation↗