Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9806233

Current reversible contraceptive methods: a global perspective.

Abstract

Since the 1960's, there have been important gains in the efforts to make the benefits of family planning accessible to people around the world. However, prevalence of contraceptive use is still low in some areas, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Making contraceptives accessible through good quality services should be a goal for reproductive health programs. In the absence of an ideal method of contraception which would suit every individual, there is a variety of contraceptive methods with advantages in some aspects and disadvantages in others from which people should be able to choose according to their particular characteristics and needs. Important aspects to take into consideration include effectiveness, convenience, and safety. In general, the most effective methods are more likely to have some side effects and method-related complications. However, when weighing the risks and benefits, the most effective methods have greater benefits on the health of women by protecting them better from the health risks of unwanted pregnancies. Most methods also have non-contraceptive benefits - for instance, combined oral contraceptives (COCs) provide important degrees of protection against endometrial and ovarian cancers, benign breast disease, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and ectopic pregnancy. They also reduce menstrual blood loss. Although barrier methods have lower effectiveness against pregnancy, their most important advantage is the protection they can provide against sexually transmitted diseases. The male condom in particular (and probably the female condom) has the special value of providing protection against HIV infection. This paper describes reversible methods of contraception including possible health risks and contraindications. Adequate counseling, however, is essential for people to make an appropriate choice of contraception and to secure safe and effective use of the method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C M Huezo. 1998. Current reversible contraceptive methods: a global perspective.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00084-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A compensation election for binary social choice.

We report experimental results examining the properties of a bidding mechanism, the "Compensation Election," which is designed to implement a simple binary choice between two options. We may think of the group decision problem as a choice between a new rule and the status quo. The rule and the status quo are each common outcomes that apply across all individuals, but the value or cost that they induce on each individual differs according to each individual's circumstances: some gain, some lose, and others are unaffected by a change to the new from the old. Rather than casting votes, each subject submits a bid reflecting his willingness to pay to induce the group to select one option and the amount he wishes to be paid if the alternative option is selected. The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest sum of bids. We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above their value (or even for the option they do not prefer), such behavior is not the norm. We also find that subjects' bids more truthfully reveal their values when there are more bidders in the election.

Choice Behavior↗

The effects of expanding patient choice of provider on waiting times: evidence from a policy experiment.

Long waiting times for inpatient treatment in the UK National Health Service have been a source of popular and political concern, and therefore a target for policy initiatives. In the London Patient Choice Project, patients at risk of breaching inpatient waiting time targets were offered the choice of an alternative hospital with a guaranteed shorter wait. This paper develops a simple theoretical model of the effect of greater patient choice on waiting times. It then uses a difference in difference econometric methodology to estimate the impact of the London choice project on ophthalmology waiting times. In line with the model predictions, the project led to shorter average waiting times in the London region and a convergence in waiting times amongst London hospitals.

Choice Behavior↗