Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 976021

Outline of chronohygiene.

Abstract

Since chronotherapy already manipulates rhythmical functions, it is the important task of chronohygiene to outline the object of therapy i.e. health, from chronobiological points of view. Only on such a basis can chronohygiene be extended to the preventive provisions of health care and health education in regard to the biological time structure. Health can be characterized as an optimal state of harmonious time structure and its integration into the temporal orders of the environment. The circannual variations of an organism establish a seasonal risk cycle changing the inner preconditions of therapy as well. Moreover, chronohygiene must raise the question of whether the biological circannual rhythm is an integrating component of the human time organization, or if it may be levelled by civilization. Circadian variations of the organism not only modify the preconditions of therapy, but in particular those of activity and efficiency. The nocturnal maximum of functional economy normally is protected against exploitation by a simultaneous minimum of vigilance, which provides the nightly recovery. Therefore the destruction of this phase relationship by night-work must worsen recovery conditions. The disturbance of the time structure in the organism by night-work not only affects the circadian system, but faster rhythms as well. The phase position of the circadian rhythms is closely related to the individual responsiveness of the autonomous system as well as to the pulse-respiration-ratio. The latter can serve as a chronobiological criterion for evaluating suitability or risk of night- and shift-work. The effort of chronohygiene is based on the fact that disturbances of the time structure represent just a complementary aspect to disturbances of the spatial structure of the organism.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Hildebrandt. Outline of chronohygiene.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/976021/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Role of Ca(2+) in the pacemaker-like property of spinal motoneurons].

It is generally accepted that locomotion in vertebrate species is produced by signals coded and integrated by neurons of the spinal cord. In fact, the basic features of locomotion, including patterns and rhythms, are generated by a network of neurons called the CPG (central pattern generator) essentially localized in the lumbar segments of the spinal cord. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying the rhythmic aspect of CPG-generated locomotion are not fully understood. Here, we report data of studies that focus on the role of Ca(2+)-related mechanisms involved in the expression of the pacemaker property of lumbar motoneurons that innervate the hindlimbs. In fact, it has become increasingly clear that Ca(2+) plays a determinant function in the expression of this active and conditional rhythmic property. In addition to NMDA-mediated currents (NMDA is an agonist of the calcium permeable ionotropic glutamatergic receptor) and to a Ca(2+)-dependent K(+) current that were found twenty years ago to contribute to intrinsic voltage oscillations in motoneurons, a pivotal role for voltage-gated channels (e.g., CaV1.3) and intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations ([Ca(2+)]i) have recently been shown. Increasing evidence of a role for metabotropic receptor subtypes, calmodulin (a calcium binding protein), ryanodine and IP3-sensitive intracellular stores of Ca(2+) suggests that additional mechanisms are yet to be identified. A detailed understanding of the complex role of Ca(2+) in mediating the auto-rhythmic property of spinal neurons may contribute to the development of novel therapeutic approaches to induce locomotion after spinal cord injury.

Biological Clocks↗

Gates and oscillators II: zeitgebers and the network model of the brain clock.

Circadian rhythms in physiology and behavior are regulated by the SCN. When assessed by expression of clock genes, at least 2 distinct functional cell types are discernible within the SCN: nonrhythmic, light-inducible, retinorecipient cells and rhythmic autonomous oscillator cells that are not directly retinorecipient. To predict the responses of the circadian system, the authors have proposed a model based on these biological properties. In this model, output of rhythmic oscillator cells regulates the activity of the gate cells. The gate cells provide a daily organizing signal that maintains phase coherence among the oscillator cells. In the absence of external stimuli, this arrangement yields a multicomponent system capable of producing a self-sustained consensus rhythm. This follow-up study considers how the system responds when the gate cells are activated by an external stimulus, simulating a response to an entraining (or phase-setting) signal. In this model, the authors find that the system can be entrained to periods within the circadian range, that the free-running system can be phase shifted by timed activation of the gate, and that the phase response curve for activation is similar to that observed when animals are exposed to a light pulse. Finally, exogenous triggering of the gate over a number of days can organize an arrhythmic system, simulating the light-dependent reappearance of rhythmicity in a population of disorganized, independent oscillators. The model demonstrates that a single mechanism (i.e., the output of gate cells) can account for not only free-running and entrained rhythmicity but also other circadian phenomena, including limits of entrainment, a PRC with both delay and advance zones, and the light-dependent reappearance of rhythmicity in an arrhythmic animal.

Biological Clocks↗