Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9727821

New insights into erectile dysfunction: a practical approach.

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most common sexual problem in men, after premature ejaculation, affecting up to 30 million in the United States. In a society in which sexuality is widely promoted, ED impacts on feelings of self-worth and self-confidence and may impair the quality of life of affected men and their partners. Damage to personal relationships can ensue; and the anger, depression, and anxiety engendered spill over into all aspects of life. Patients are often embarrassed or reluctant to discuss the matter with their primary care practitioners. Unfortunately, many physicians fail to take the opportunity to promote open discussion of sexual dysfunction. They too, may avoid the topic through personal embarrassment. Since the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference on Impotence in 1992, the inadequate level of public and professional understanding of ED has begun to be addressed. As a first step in breaking down the communication barriers between patients and practitioners, it is important that physicians have a thorough understanding of the wide variety of conditions associated with ED and how the different risk factors for ED may be readily identified. This review addresses the diagnosis of ED and identifies diagnostic tests that can be used by primary care physicians to determine the patients most at risk and the treatments most suited to meet the patients' and their partners' goal for therapy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S G Korenman. 1998. New insights into erectile dysfunction: a practical approach.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00191-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Short history of erectile dysfunction treatment].

Since the origin, the man tried by all possible means to restor his erectile capacity. The obscurantism prevailed for a long time. We had to wait up to the turn of the 19th Century with Freud to get that things evolve a little bit. In the Fifties, the first penile prostheses were developed by Goodwin and Scott. In the Sixties, the behavioral therapies by Masters and Johnson. The Eighties represent the pharmacological revolution with the discovery of the effects of papaverin by Virag, then the E1 prostaglandin by Ishii, as well as the inhibitors of the 5 phospho di esterase (sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil) following studies on nitric oxide by Ignarro, Nobel Prize of medicine in 1998.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability in the volume of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) performed by urologists in the USA, and the physician characteristics that predict RP volume, as previous studies showed that individual surgeon volume for RP is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a nationwide, representative survey of 2000 urologists who treat prostate carcinoma in the USA, we asked respondents to indicate a numerical range of RPs they perform each year (none, 1-10, 11-30, and >30, the last which we defined as 'high volume'). We then identified characteristics of the provider and practice associated with a high volume of RPs. Supplementing survey results with other national data, we estimated the proportion of all RPs in the USA performed by 'high-volume' urologists. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66.1% (1313 urologists) with no differences between the respondents and non-respondents for the measured demographic variables. Among urologists who performed RPs (89.1% of the sample), 37.3% did < or = 10, 46.9% 11-30 and 15.8% >30 RPs/year. Academic and urological oncology fellowship-trained urologists were, respectively, 41% and 27% more likely than private-practice and non-fellowship-trained urologists to have a high volume of RPs. Of all RPs performed yearly in the USA, only an estimated 46.1% were by high-volume urologists. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of urologists report a RP volume that might be associated with higher rates of cardiac, respiratory, vascular, wound-healing, and genitourinary complications. Further study is needed to characterize the possible relationships between RP volume and tumour recurrence, survival, and long-term erectile dysfunction and incontinence.

Erectile Dysfunction↗