Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S G Korenman

Publications and source records attributed to S G Korenman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Common treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome and major depressive disorder: case report and review.

We present the case of a young woman with treatment-resistant major depression, who presented to the Mood Disorders Clinic with a Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-21) score of 28, after a year-long treatment with Effexor-XR. The patient also had untreated Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). The resolution of her depressive symptoms resulted from the treatment for PCOS with metformin and spironolactone. The patient remained euthymic 5 months after discontinuation of the antidepressant while continuing therapy for PCOS. We briefly overview of the pertinent literature of the pathophysiology of PCOS and affective disorders, highlighting an overlap in phenotypical presentations between these two disorders. Dysregulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis and various end organ systems are implicated in both PCOS and affective disorders. As such, several clinical and biochemical markers are common to both disorders, namely insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperandrogenism. In addition, these metabolic abnormalities are interrelated, causing women with PCOS or affective disorders to get caught in a "vicious cycle" of hormonal dysregulation. The case report presented here illustrates how treatment of symptoms such as insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism can lead to remission of major depressive disorder and PCOS. We suggest that through treatment of underlying metabolic defects, both the mood of the patient and the metabolic condition of PCOS can be assisted.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Erectile dysfunction.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Measuring consensus about scientific research norms.

In this paper, we empirically explore some manifestations of norms for the conduct of science. We focus on scientific research ethics and report survey results from 606 scientists who received funding in 1993 and 1994 from the Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Biology Directorate of the National Science Foundation. We also report results for 91 administrators charged with overseeing research integrity at the scientists' research institutions. Both groups of respondents were presented with a set of scenarios, designed by fractional factorial methods, describing different kinds of scientific conduct that in the eyes of some would likely be unethical. Respondents then were asked to evaluate each of these scenarios for how unethical the behavior might be and what kinds of sanctions might be appropriate. We use the responses to consider the nature of consensus around norms related to the practice of science and in particular, similarities and differences between scientists and science administrators. Implications for policy are also discussed.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed1999

Reporting unethical research behavior.

Scientists, as professionals, have a responsibility to self-regulate. However, whistleblowing is rare. We investigated scientists' infrequent disclosure of unethical behavior by studying their responses to scenarios describing unethical research acts and compared their responses to those of research administrators. A cross-sectional survey was administered to National Science Foundation-funded principal investigators and their institutions' representatives (IRs) to the Office of Research Integrity. Both scientists and IRs proposed to respond to nearly all research behaviors that they rated as unethical. Scientists more often proposed responses limited to the research team (58% vs. 25% of cases, p < .001) whereas IRs more often proposed to inform an administrator or dean, journal editor, funding agency, professional society, or reporter. The prior behavior and academic rank of the scenario protagonist were associated with responses, but consequences of the unethical behavior were not. Scientists appear to perceive that they uphold their responsibility to respond to unethical behavior by disclosures within the research team, whereas administrators propose to report to externally accountable individuals, raising the question of whether scientists' behavior constitutes professional self-regulation or cover up.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of the research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity.

CONTEXT: The professional integrity of scientists is important to society as a whole and particularly to disciplines such as medicine that depend heavily on scientific advances for their progress. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the professional norms of active scientists and compare them with those of individuals with institutional responsibility for the conduct of research. DESIGN: A mailed survey consisting of 12 scenarios in 4 domains of research ethics. Respondents were asked whether an act was unethical and, if so, the degree to which they considered it unethical and to select responses and punishments for the act. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 924 National Science Foundation research grantees in 1993 or 1994 in molecular or cellular biology and 140 representatives from the researchers' institutions to the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of respondents considering an act unethical and the mean malfeasance rating on a scale of 1 to 10. RESULTS: A total of 606 research grantees and 91 institutional representatives responded to the survey (response rate of 69% of those who could be contacted). Respondents reported a hierarchy of unethical research behaviors. The mean malfeasance rating was unrelated to the characteristics of the investigator performing the hypothetical act or to its consequences. Fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism received malfeasance ratings higher than 8.6, and virtually all thought they were unethical. Deliberately misleading statements about a paper or failure to give proper attribution received ratings between 7 and 8. Sloppiness, oversights, conflicts of interest, and failure to share were less serious still, receiving malfeasance ratings between 5 and 6. Institutional representatives proposed more and different interventions and punishments than the scientists. CONCLUSIONS: Surveyed scientists and institutional representatives had strong and similar norms of professional behavior, but differed in their approaches to an unethical act.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed1998

New insights into erectile dysfunction: a practical approach.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most common sexual problem in men, after premature ejaculation, affecting up to 30 million in the United States. In a society in which sexuality is widely promoted, ED impacts on feelings of self-worth and self-confidence and may impair the quality of life of affected men and their partners. Damage to personal relationships can ensue; and the anger, depression, and anxiety engendered spill over into all aspects of life. Patients are often embarrassed or reluctant to discuss the matter with their primary care practitioners. Unfortunately, many physicians fail to take the opportunity to promote open discussion of sexual dysfunction. They too, may avoid the topic through personal embarrassment. Since the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference on Impotence in 1992, the inadequate level of public and professional understanding of ED has begun to be addressed. As a first step in breaking down the communication barriers between patients and practitioners, it is important that physicians have a thorough understanding of the wide variety of conditions associated with ED and how the different risk factors for ED may be readily identified. This review addresses the diagnosis of ED and identifies diagnostic tests that can be used by primary care physicians to determine the patients most at risk and the treatments most suited to meet the patients' and their partners' goal for therapy.

Erectile Dysfunction↗
PubMed1998

Punishment for unethical behavior in the conduct of research.

PURPOSE: To investigate the perceptions of scientists and institutional representatives (IRs) to the National Institutes of Health's Office of Research Integrity concerning appropriate punishment for unethical research behavior. METHOD: In 1994-95, 606 scientists and 91 IRs rated the ethical behaviors of and suggested appropriate punishments for protagonists in randomly generated scenarios describing scientific research behaviors. The authors evaluated the relationships of the suggested punishments to the protagonists' behaviors and characteristics, and compared recommendations of the scientists and IRs. RESULTS: The respondents suggested punishments for 80% of the scenarios that were rated unethical. Punishments were more often prescribed for behaviors rated more unethical and for repeat offenders. The type of punishment was related to the protagonist's academic status and the nature of the unethical behavior. IRs proposed more and different punishments than did scientists. CONCLUSION: Scientists and IRs proposed that most unethical research behaviors be punished. The decision to punish depended on the unethical level of the behavior. The type of punishment depended on the aims: correcting the wrong, rehabilitation, or sanction. Variation in the respondents' selections of punishments and the IRs' greater propensity to punish suggest that scientists committing similar ethical violations may receive different punishments. Explicit consideration of which punishment is merited under what circumstances should be undertaken by the scientific community.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed1998

Differential effect of race on the axial and appendicular skeletons of children.

The prevalence of osteoporosis and the incidence of fractures are substantially lower in black than in white subjects, a finding generally attributed to racial differences in adult bone mass. Whether these racial differences are present in childhood is the subject of considerable interest, as the amount of bone gained during growth is a major determinant of future susceptibility to fractures. We measured the density and size of the vertebrae and femurs of 80 black and 80 white healthy children, 8-18 yr of age, matched for age, gender, height, weight, and stage of sexual development, using computed tomography. Race had a significant and differential effect on the bones in the axial and appendicular skeletons. In the axial skeleton, black children had greater cancellous bone density, but similar cross-sectional area of the vertebral bodies. In contrast, in the appendicular skeleton, black children had greater femoral cross-sectional area, but similar cortical bone area and cortical bone density. Compared to white children, vertebral bone density and femoral cross-sectional area at sexual maturity were, on the average, 10.75% and 5.7% higher, respectively, in black children. Such significant variations may contribute to the racial differences in the prevalence of osteoporosis between black and white adults.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about scientists' views on normative research ethics and how these compare with the views of the institutional representatives (IRs) involved in matters of scientific conduct. We qualitatively evaluated scientist and IR perceptions of the norms of science, ethical violations and their harms, factors contributing to violations, and approaches to improve scientific conduct. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with National Science Foundation investigators and with IRs. Themes were extracted from observation, notes, and transcripts. Consensus and contrasts within and between groups were described. RESULTS: Scientists described a rich set of norms including honesty, integrity, service, sharing, openness, mentoring, and meticulous work habits. Institutional representatives focused on good citizenship and abiding by administrative rules. Both groups listed similar ethical violations, though scientists felt that severe violations were rare, that science was self-correcting, and that the greatest harm from misconduct disclosure was the loss of public trust and funding. Institutional representatives called for increased and less confidential misconduct investigations. Reporting misconduct was strongly supported by IRs but rejected by scientists. Both scientists and IRs believed that formal research ethics education was needed for trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Scientists in these focus groups upheld a complex set of norms that mirror prior codes of science and exceed national misconduct rules. The sharply contrasting views of scientists and IRs concerning responsibility to report misconduct, the utility of misconduct investigation, and penalties for misconduct highlight areas where open discussion and constructive resolution are needed to formulate a functional mechanism to enhance the ethical conduct of science.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed1995

Use of sodium ipodate in management of hyperthyroidism in subacute thyroiditis.

Five hyperthyroid patients (two men and three women) with typical features of subacute thyroiditis were treated with sodium ipodate (Oragrafin; 0.5 g, orally daily or every other day) for 15-60 days; the treatment was stopped when both serum T4 and T3 levels were normal. All patients studied demonstrated a prompt normalization of serum T3, improvement in clinical symptoms of hyperthyroidism, and/or weight gain. We observed no side-effects of treatment with sodium ipodate. Our data suggest that sodium ipodate is a safe and effective agent for management of hyperthyroidism in subacute thyroiditis.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Association of elevated estradiol with remote testicular trauma in young infertile men.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of remote testicular trauma and of possible related permanent hormonal and seminal changes in infertile men. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study of hormonal and seminal parameters in a subpopulation of infertile men. SETTING: Andrology Clinic in an academic research environment. PARTICIPANTS: Infertile men, with and without history of remote testicular trauma, and fertile volunteers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of infertile men with history of blunt testicular trauma, concentrations of reproductive hormones, and semen parameters. RESULTS: Significant remote blunt testicular trauma was reported by 16.8% of infertile men. This had occurred 2 to 17 years (mean, 16.4 years) before evaluation, mostly with contact sports at adolescent age. Estradiol concentrations after testicular trauma were 19% and 25% higher than in infertile men without history of testicular injury and in fertile controls. Elevated E2 levels did not correlate with T. Infertile men with and without history of testicular trauma showed changes in seminal parameters. CONCLUSION: The incidence of remote blunt testicular trauma in infertile men is unexpectedly high. After injury, FSH-stimulated aromatization of T may increase testicular E2 production, interfere with spermatogenesis, and cause infertility. Consistent use of protective devices in contact sports is recommended.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Cultural-sensitivity training in U.S. medical schools.

BACKGROUND: As the United States becomes more multicultural, physicians face the challenge of providing culturally sensitive and appropriate health care to patients with differing health beliefs and values. While a few schools are providing cultural-sensitivity training in response to the changing patient population, the pervasiveness of such training has not been thoroughly reported. METHOD: In 1991-92, all 126 U.S. medical schools were surveyed regarding their implementation and plans for future implementation of cultural-sensitivity training. The t-test was used to compare data from those schools that offered separate, formal cultural-sensitivity courses with data from the schools that did not offer such courses. RESULTS: Of the 126 schools surveyed, 98 (78%) responded. Only 13 of the responding schools offered cultural-sensitivity courses to their students, and all but one of these courses were optional. These 13 schools reported a greater perceived likelihood that their students would have contact with African-American patients (t = 2.88, p < .05). Despite the few courses offered and the common perception that recent graduates were only "somewhat prepared" to provide culturally sensitive clinical services, only 33 schools were planning to implement new courses. CONCLUSION: The results indicate needs for more cultural-sensitivity training and for further studies to determine the most effective type of training for students.

Cultural Characteristics↗
PubMed1993

Conflicts of interest and commercialization of research.

The author introduces questions about the commercialization of science, focusing on fairness and conflicts of interest, and suggests the bases for policy initiatives. First, is it fair for government-supported research to enrich research universities and individual scientists? The belief that it is unfair seems limited to biomedicine and is not shared by other fields and government research agencies. The main concerns, however, are conflicts of interest and of commitment (loss of objectivity, reordering of priorities, degradation of science as an open and collegial enterprise, conflicts of commitment, and exploitation of graduate students and postdoctoral fellows). The author outlines 11 principles that can be used in setting policies about conflict of interest and commitment, including the principles that these conflicts are inevitable, that technology transfer should be supported rather than hindered, that the type and amount of financial reward received by the faculty are not as important as the strings attached by the commercial sponsor, and that trainees must be protected from working in settings where they cannot discuss or promptly publish their work.

Academic Medical Centers↗