PubMed · 9692496
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A J Levine, B Sethia, W J Brawn. 1998. Delayed sternal closure.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9692496/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
UNDERESTIMATED FREQUENCY: Post-operative intraabdominal infections usually appear as abscesses or injury of the bowel, either alone or in combination. These complications of frequently underestimated frequency are characterized by high mortality. Improvement of their prognosis is obtained by early recognition of the complication and a multidisciplinary approach. ALARM SIGNS: In a patient who recently underwent abdominal surgery, the onset of abnormal signs must be considered as an alarm which imposes ruling out intraabdominal complications. Unexplained multiple organ failure or septic shock in the post-operative period of intraabdominal surgery must lead to considering explorative laparotomy. THERAPEUTICS: Etiologic treatment must be ideal and total from the first reoperation. Antibiotic therapy administered from the surgical reoperation must be different from previous treatments. This treatment is aimed at eradicating enterobacteriaceae, non-fermenting Gram negative aerobes, Gram positive cocci, anaerobes and fungi.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the comparative efficacy of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill surgical and medical patients, and in selected subgroups of surgical patients with pancreatitis, major burn injury, and those undergoing major elective surgery and transplantation. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE database was searched from January 1966 to December 1996 using the terms "decontamination or prophylaxis," "intensive care units," and "antibiotics." The search was limited to English-language studies evaluating the efficacy of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in human subjects. STUDY SELECTION: The primary review was restricted to prospective randomized trials. DATA EXTRACTION: End points of interest included rates of nosocomial pneumonia, bacteremia, urinary tract infection, wound infection, mortality, and length of intensive care unit stay. Methodologic quality of individual studies was assessed using a previously described model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Odds ratios (ORs) together with their (95% confidence interval [Cls]) were reported and determined using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Mortality was significantly reduced with the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill surgical patients (OR, 0.7, 95% CI, 0.52-0.93), while no such effect was demonstrated in critically ill medical patients (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.71-1.18). The greatest effect was demonstrated in studies where both the topical and systemic components of the regimen were used. Rates of pneumonia were reduced in both subsets of patients, while those of bacteremia were significantly reduced only in surgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract notably reduces mortality in critically ill surgical patients, while critically ill medical patients derive no such benefit. These data suggest that the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract should be limited to those populations in whom rates of nosocomial infection are high and in whom infection contributes notably to adverse outcome.