Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9692031

Variability in glaucomatous visual fields: implications for shared care schemes.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish the extent of variability in the visual fields of patients with glaucoma using a suprathreshold perimetric test strategy. The visual fields of 104 patients (126 eyes) were measured twice, on separate days, with a Henson CFA3000 central visual field analyser. All eyes had a diagnosis of glaucoma and had a minimum of three stimuli missed at 12 dB above their threshold estimate derived at the beginning of the first suprathreshold examination. The perimeter tested 132 locations within the central 25 degrees with a multiple stimulus suprathreshold strategy. Data were analysed on the basis of the difference in the number of recorded missed stimuli between the two visits. Large amounts of variability were found in the visual field results. Variability was largest when all levels of defect were included (> = 5 dB) and was found to be independent of the overall extent of loss. Results from the superior hemifield were found to be more variable than those from the inferior hemifield. The results highlight the problem of differentiating real change in visual field status from the enhanced variability seen in patients with glaucomatous visual field loss. The results from this study can be used to establish return-referral criteria for shared care schemes. The advantages of duplicate measures of the visual field are highlighted.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D B Henson, P G Spry, I C Spencer, J M Sparrow. 1998. Variability in glaucomatous visual fields: implications for shared care schemes.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9692031/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗