Cataract in older women exposed to hormone replacement.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J M Sparrow.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Endophthalmitis remains a serious and potentially blinding complication of cataract surgery with an overall incidence of approximately 0.14% or one in 700 operations. Despite this knowledge of overall frequency, healthcare providers find themselves confronted with clusters of cases where the appropriate level of response to the cluster is uncertain. AIM: To illustrate, by means of Monte-Carlo simulation models, the likelihood of random clustering of cases arising in units within a healthcare setting resembling the NHS and separately within the practices of individual surgeons. METHOD: Simulation models were constructed within a programming language in which individual cataract operations were simulated with a one in 700 likelihood of each operation resulting in a 'case of endophthalmitis'. Random clustering of 'cases of endophthalmitis' was observed in the models and 'outbreaks' were noted and tracked for various outbreak definitions. RESULTS: The model outputs are presented graphically as the proportion of 'simulated units' affected by an 'outbreak' in a year and separately as the proportion of surgeons affected for a range of 'outbreak definitions'. CONCLUSION: These data presentations are easy to use and should facilitate a better understanding of shifts from endemic to epidemic rates of endophthalmitis with appropriate investigation of situations where a remediable common cause may exist.
UNLABELLED: Waterclefts and retrodots are independently associated with visual impairment, yet a review identified no data on risk factors. PURPOSE: To investigate risk factors for these two human lens cataract subtypes. METHOD: Two nested case-control studies: The host study comprised 1078 subjects (55 years) attending the Somerset and Avon Eye Study (SAES). In total, 197 watercleft cases (Oxford grade 0.2 in either eye) and 199 retrodot cases (Oxford grade 1.0 in either eye) were individually age/gender matched to controls. Detailed ophthalmic and potential risk factor data were collected, including body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol, diabetes, hypertension, analgesics, vitamin supplementation, nutrition, sunlight exposure, dehydration, hormonal (women), blood lipids, glucose, urea, creatinine, uric acid, and vitamin levels. RESULTS: For waterclefts, univariable analysis identified BMI, alcohol intake, vitamin status, sunlight, urea, creatinine, and uric acid as possible risk factors. Multivariable analysis identified two independent associations. Total number of 'any' analgesics in the previous year: adjusted P<0.01 (U-shaped risk profile, unadjusted high vs medium use (=reference) OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.35-4.26 with medium use vs none (=reference) OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.72); total sunlight: adjusted P=0.03 (unadjusted highest exposure vs lowest (=reference) OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.11-9.50). For retrodots, univariable analysis identified alcohol, HRT, and lipids. Multivariable analysis identified two independent associations. Mean number of alcohol units consumed per month, adjusted P=0.02 and HDL cholesterol levels, adjusted P=0.02 (unadjusted ORs NS both). CONCLUSION: This is the first available published information on risk factors for the human cataractous lens features waterclefts and retrodots.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the vision-related quality of life (VR-QOL) in patients with good distance Snellen visual acuity (VA) who are listed for cataract surgery. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional prospective study of patients listed for cataract surgery. VA and VR-QOL data using the VCMI questionnaire were collected on patients attending preoperative assessment during June 2002. RESULTS: A total of 397 cataract patients were listed during this month. Following exclusions there were 378 eligible individuals, 210 (56%) of whom had a VA of 6/12 or better in the eye scheduled for surgery. Of these, 40% patients had only mild VR-QOL impairment. More than half of the patients with good VA (6/12 or better) in the surgery eye and mild VR-QOL impairment described their vision as poor in this eye. However, most of these patients were not dissatisfied with their overall level of vision. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients listed for cataract surgery with VA of 6/12 or better had only mild VR-QOL impairment and were not dissatisfied with their overall level of vision. The decision to list a patient for surgery may have been based on the patient's perception of monocular vision rather than their quality of life.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate routine ophthalmic data to identify clinically useful risk factors for progressive visual field loss in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) already receiving intraocular pressure-lowering treatments. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used. Routine ophthalmic data for all subjects were obtained from case records with the knowledge that baseline clinical data had been collected in a standardised manner. Progression was defined according to the AGIS visual field defect scoring system. Variables evaluated as candidate risk factors for progression were assessed by survival analysis. Factors exerting a significant effect on survival were subsequently tested in a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A cohort of 108 eligible POAG patients was followed over an average of 3.6 years, with an average visual field intertest interval of 8 months. The incidence rate of progressive loss among the cohort was 5.4 cases per 100 person years. Increasing age was found to be independently associated with a small but significantly increased risk of glaucomatous visual field defect progression (hazard ratio 1.07, P=0.022), and a borderline association was also demonstrated with being male (hazard ratio 2.76, P=0.057). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective investigation has provided preliminary information on factors associated with increased risk of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss that may inform clinical care strategies. Lack of concordance with other studies suggests that further prospective investigations are needed if risk stratification strategies are to be employed in caring for patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma.
AIM: The primary aim of this large pilot survey was to demonstrate the use and benefits of electronic data collection with respect to rapidly monitoring the access, delivery, and outcome of cataract surgery in the NHS and to update benchmark standards for these parameters of care. METHOD: Eight NHS departments that currently use specialty-specific electronic clinical systems or Electronic Patient Records (EPR) to collect a minimum preoperative, operative, and anaesthetic data set for cataract surgery agreed to pool their data. RESULTS: A total of 162 surgeons from 50 consultant teams and eight NHS Trusts agreed to submit their data on a total of 16,541 operations for age-related cataract. This report describes the age, sex, and ethnic profiles of the patients, waiting time for surgery, ocular copathology causing a reason for a guarded visual prognosis, visual impairment on admission, visual acuity in the operated eye, and the characteristics of the anaesthetic and surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has raised the benchmark standards established by the last National Survey in 1997. There has been a near universal switch to day case, phacosurgery under local anaesthesia (all used in > or =99.1% of cases compared with 70, 77, and 86%, respectively in 1997). The visual impairment in the operated eye is lower with 45% having 6 / 12 or better compared with 27% in 1997. Waiting times and visual impairment in the fellow eye have probably improved although data collection for these variables was incomplete. All departments require specialty-specific clinical systems to efficiently collect and analyse these data and this survey proves their potential to form the basis for national electronic surveys in the future.
AIMS: To evaluate performance of frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 thresholding program in a hospital eye service (HES) glaucoma clinic. METHODS: A random sample of individuals referred consecutively to the HES for suspected glaucoma were examined with 24-2 threshold FDT in addition to routine clinical tests. The discriminatory power of FDT and standard automated perimetry (SAP) were assessed using glaucomatous optic nerve head appearance as the reference gold standard. RESULTS: 48 of 62 eligible referred individuals were recruited. Glaucoma prevalence was 31%. Median test duration per eye was 5 minutes 16 seconds for FDT and 5 minutes 9 seconds for SAP. There was no significant difference (p = 0.184) between proportions of individuals with reliable test results (FDT 75%, SAP 63%). Using a clinically appropriate binary criterion for abnormal visual field, sensitivity and specificity levels were 100% and 26% respectively for FDT and 80% and 52% for SAP. Both tests had higher negative than positive predictive values with marginal differences between tests. Criterion free receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed minimal discriminatory power differences. CONCLUSIONS: In a HES glaucoma clinic in which new referrals are evaluated, threshold 24-2 FDT testing with the Humphrey Matrix has performance characteristics similar to SAP. These findings suggest threshold testing using the FDT Matrix and SAP is comparable when the 24-2 test pattern is used.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of the study was to develop a new questionnaire to assess visual symptoms/dysfunction and impact on vision-specific quality of life for those undergoing second eye cataract extraction. Items for the VSQ questionnaire were devised with reference to existing literature and following consultation with eye care experts (n = 18) and interviews with cataract patients (n = 40). Piloting work conducted with 53 patients indicated that the questionnaire was promising, with a high level of internal consistency, low levels of missing data and indications that it was responsive to surgery. A modified version of the questionnaire was completed by 105 patients having received 'early' surgery and 103 scheduled for routine surgery within a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of second eye cataract surgery. Analyses showed that the internal consistency of both the visual symptoms/dysfunction and quality of life areas was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.82 and 0.83, respectively). Highly significant improvements were found for early surgery patients (p < 0.0001), with little change among routine surgery patients. Two final versions of the VSQ questionnaire have been produced for future use in assessing visual symptoms/dysfunction and impact on vision-specific quality of life: a scoreable short form and more detailed and sensitive long form.
AIMS: To evaluate the effect of a visual field test educational video on the reliability of the first automated visual field test of new patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of an educational video on visual field test reliability of patients referred to the hospital eye service for suspected glaucoma was undertaken. Patients were randomised to either watch an educational video or a control group with no video. The video group was shown a 4.5 minute audiovisual presentation to familiarize them with the various aspects of visual field examination with particular emphasis on sources of unreliability. Reliability was determined using standard criteria of fixation loss rate less than 20%, false positive responses less than 33%, and false negative responses less than 33%. RESULTS: 244 patients were recruited; 112 in the video group and 132 in the control group with no significant between group difference in age, sex, and density of field defects. A significant improvement in reliability (p=0.015) was observed in the group exposed to the video with 85 (75.9%) patients having reliable results compared to 81 (61.4%) in the control group. The difference was not significant for the right (first tested) eye with 93 (83.0%) of the visual fields reliable in the video group compared to 106 (80.0%) in the control group (p = 0.583), but was significant for the left (second tested) eye with 97 (86.6 %) of the video group reliable versus 97 (73.5%) of the control group (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a brief, audiovisual patient information guide on taking the visual field test produced an improvement in patient reliability for individuals tested for the first time. In this trial the use of the video had most of its impact by reducing the number of unreliable fields from the second tested eye.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Preschool screening for amblyopia has controversially been abandoned in some localities within the United Kingdom, on the basis that there is no clear evidence of benefit to support its continuation. Data collected within a birth cohort study were used to examine visual outcomes at 7(1/2) years in children who did or did not receive preschool vision screening. METHODS: Monocular logMAR visual acuity with and without a pinhole was assessed by orthoptists. Contemporary records were used to identify children who had been offered and/or received preschool screening. RESULTS: Of 6081 children, 24.9% had been offered preschool screening and 16.7% had attended. The prevalence of amblyopia was approximately 45% lower in the children who received preschool screening than in those who did not (1.1% v 2.0%, p = 0.05). The mean acuity in the worse seeing eyes after patching treatment was better for amblyopic children who received preschool screening than for those who did not; 0.14 v 0.20 logMAR (p <0.001). These effects did not persist in an intention to screen analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preschool screening at 37 months was associated with an improved treatment outcome for individuals with amblyopia. However, the improvement was clinically small and disappeared when considering all children offered screening rather than only those who received it. Further research is needed into improving the effectiveness of vision screening for preschool children, while in the interim these data do not conflict with current recommendations for school entry screening by orthoptists.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of early treatment for amblyopia in children. DESIGN: Follow up of outcomes of treatment for amblyopia in a randomised controlled trial comparing intensive orthoptic screening at 8, 12, 18, 25, 31, and 37 months (intensive group) with orthoptic screening at 37 months only (control group). SETTING: Avon, southwest England. PARTICIPANTS: 3490 children who were part of a birth cohort study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of amblyopia and visual acuity of the worse seeing eye at 7.5 years of age. RESULTS: Amblyopia at 7.5 years was less prevalent in the intensive group than in the control group (0.6% v 1.8%; P=0.02). Mean visual acuities in the worse seeing eye were better for children who had been treated for amblyopia in the intensive group than for similar children in the control group (0.15 v 0.26 LogMAR units; P<0.001). A higher proportion of the children who were treated for amblyopia had been seen in a hospital eye clinic before 3 years of age in the intensive group than in the control group (48% v 13%; P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The intensive screening protocol was associated with better acuity in the amblyopic eye and a lower prevalence of amblyopia at 7.5 years of age, in comparison with screening at 37 months only. These data support the hypothesis that early treatment for amblyopia leads to a better outcome than later treatment and may act as a stimulus for research into feasible screening programmes.
PURPOSE: This national study was designed to audit anatomical outcome and complications relating to primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. This paper presents survey methods, characteristics of participating consultants and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient sample. METHODS: Two surveys were undertaken. The first identified consultants who at the time performed retinal detachment surgery in the National Health Service. These surgeons formed the sampling frame for a nationwide cross-sectional clinical study that audited the outcomes of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Consultants selected patients according to the study eligibility criteria and data were collected by self-administered postal questionnaires. A validation exercise was carried out to examine selection bias and reporting accuracy. RESULTS: Only 256/671 (38%) of UK consultants, who responded to the first survey, indicated that they performed retinal detachment surgery on NHS patients. Annual activity varied between 0 and 400 primary procedures for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Seven hundred and sixty-eight eligible patients from 167 consultants were recruited for the clinical study. Twenty per cent of patients had a single retinal break with less than one quadrant of associated detachment and 45% had single or multiple breaks within the same quadrant and/or less than two quadrants of associated retinal detachment. Over 50% patients had single or multiple horseshoe tears. Validation studies suggested that there was no significant bias from the selection of patients or inaccuracy in reporting outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This large unselected group of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments provides a representative sample for considering variations in re-attachment rates.
PURPOSE: This national study was designed to audit anatomical outcome and complications relating to primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. This paper presents success and complication rates, and examines variations in outcome. METHODS: Sampling and recruitment details of this nationwide cross-sectional survey of 768 patients of 167 consultant ophthalmologists having their first operation for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment have been described. The main clinical outcomes detailed here are anatomical reattachment at 3 months after surgery and complications related to surgery. Consultants with a declared special interest in retinal surgery and able to perform pars plana vitrectomy were designated specialists for the analyses. RESULTS: Overall reattachment rate with a single procedure was 77% (95% CI 73.9-80.2). There were significant differences in reattachment rates between specialists and non-specialists. Without allowing for case-mix, specialists had a reattachment rate of 82% (95% CI 77.9-85.7) with a single procedure and non-specialists 71% (95% CI 65.9-76.0). Allowing for case-mix, there was a significant difference between specialists and non-specialists for grade 2 detachments of 87% and 70% respectively (P < 0.0001). Analysing detachments by break type, the largest difference between specialists and non-specialists was observed for retinal detachments secondary to horseshoe tears, 80% and 68% respectively (P < 0.003). Specialists met the standards set for primary reattachment rates, while non-specialists did not. Over a third of patients had at least one complication reported at some point during the audit period. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were seen in reattachment rates between specialists and non-specialists, overall and for specific subgroups of patients. This study provides relevant, robust and valid standards to enable all surgeons to audit their own surgical outcomes for primary retinal detachment repair in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments, identify common categories of failure and aim to improve results.
AIM: To evaluate the correlation between internal slope analysis of the optic nerve head and visual field changes in normal eyes and those with ocular hypertension (OHT) and early glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: One eye of each of 22 normal subjects, 21 patients with ocular hypertension, and 50 patients with glaucoma were examined using the TopSS scanning laser ophthalmoscope. A series of topographic parameters measuring the internal features of the optic discs of these patients were obtained. These findings were compared with the Humphrey visual field analysis of these patients. RESULTS: Global topographic average slope and cup to disc ratio could discriminate between groups of normal and OHT patients (p = 0.02). All global and sector analysis parameters could discriminate normal subjects from POAG patients. The average slope parameter provided the best separation with a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.88. Visual field mean deviation (MD) was most closely correlated with global average slope (r = -0.60, p<10(-7)) and cup to disc ratio (r = -0.40, p<0.001). Visual field MD was also well correlated (r = -0.50, p<0.0001) with slope parameters for sectors S8, S2, and S1. CONCLUSION: Average slope, a parameter independent of reference planes and magnification effects, is capable of discriminating groups of OHT and POAG patients from a group of normal subjects. This topographic parameter is also well correlated with the visual field MD. Sector slope analysis suggests early glaucomatous damage may occur in the inferotemporal region of the optic disc.
PURPOSE: To describe the level of co-morbidity in patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Questionnaires were completed by patients undergoing first photocoagulation treatment for diabetic maculopathy or proliferative retinopathy during a 2 month period throughout the UK. RESULTS: Overall 15% of patients described angina, 9% had suffered a myocardial infarction and 6% a stroke. Self-reported renal disease was present in 8.5%. Foot ulceration was described by 10% of patients, and 4% had undergone an amputation. 35.5% of patients were on treatment for hypertension. 17.5% of patients had been hospitalised in the previous 6 months, and 3% of patients had died within 9 months of the laser treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant co-morbidity in these patients, which may affect the management of their retinopathy.