Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9687663

Impressions count.

Abstract

Nursing has long been preoccupied with its own image (Kalish & Kalish, 1987). However, the professional image of license practical/vocational nurses is vitally significant because it influences not only how you feel about yourself, but how others including physicians, other professionals, and patients relate to you and how much responsibility and empowerment you have. Your power to speak as a patient advocate and to influence policy decisions is intricately related to your image as work and in the community. Professional image is complex and is the result of impressions made by appearance, written communication, attitudes and behaviors, and time management. Frequently, the impressions you make in the first twelve seconds of meeting an individual is the one they will retain about you. Since ultimately, the image the public has of your profession begins with you attention to professional image involves a 365 day a year commitment (Stille, 1992).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Davidhizar. 1998. Impressions count.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9687663/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Development and evaluation of the Rural Trauma and Emergency Care Roadshow.

AIMS: To validate the Rural Trauma and Emergency Care (RTEC) Roadshow, an educational programme comprised of 14 skills-based, educational modules in trauma care designed for rural general practitioners and taught as a travelling roadshow in isolated rural areas. METHOD: The first 31 rural general practitioners to participate in the course completed an extensive participant satisfaction rating form. They also underwent pre-and post-testing of knowledge using a written true/false test, of skills using an OSCE examination and of stress related to being on call using a self-assessment, Likert scale. RESULTS: Participant satisfaction was high with a mean rating of 4.7 (maximum of 5) for overall course quality and relevance of content. There was a significant increase in skills (from 46 to 73% mean OSCE scores), in knowledge (from 58 to 69% mean true-false test scores) and in confidence in handling major trauma (from 3.9 to 5.3 on a ten point scale) as a result of the course. CONCLUSION: The RTEC course is effective in increasing the skills and knowledge of general practitioners in trauma care.

Attitude of Health Personnel