PubMed · 9682541
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J A Speechley, P A Hancock. 1998-06-13. Dihydrocodeine removal.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809686
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Although neuropeptide FF (NPFF) is generally considered an anti-opioid, its intrathecal administration produces analgesia. In the present study, the stable analog 1DMe ([D.Tyr(1), (NMe)Phe(3)]neuropeptide FF) was used in quantitative autoradiographic experiments in combination with surgical and chemical lesions to precisely localize NPFF receptors in the rat spinal cord. Ligation of lumbar dorsal spinal roots revealed the presence of NPFF receptors in dorsal root fibers and it induced a significant accumulation of [(125)I]1DMe-specific binding on the side peripheral to the ligature, demonstrating that a population of NPFF receptors is synthesized in dorsal root ganglia and migrates anterogradely towards primary afferent nerve endings. Complete mid-thoracic spinal cord transection failed to modify the [(125)I]1DMe labeling density in the dorsal horn, indicating that NPFF receptors are not located on the descending fiber terminals. In contrast, unilateral microinjections of kainic acid into the dorsal horn dramatically reduced [(125)I]1DMe-specific binding in the superficial layers, revealing localization of a population of NPFF receptors on the spinal intrinsic neurons. NPFF receptor binding was not modified during the development of spinal opioid tolerance. The pre- and postsynaptic localization of spinal NPFF receptors provide further support for heterogeneity in the pain modulation by NPFF and related agonists.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The acute interaction between opioid receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors on nociception was examined in rats using tail-flick and paw-pressure vocalisation tests. When injected at various times (1 to 6 h) after morphine (5 to 20 mg/kg, i.v.) or fentanyl (4x40 microgram/kg, i.v.), the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg, s.c.) not only abolished the opiate-induced increase in nociceptive threshold, but also reduced it below the basal value (hyperalgesia). The noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.15 or 0.30 mg/kg, s.c.) prevented the naloxone-precipitated hyperalgesia and enhanced the antinociceptive effects of morphine (7.5 mg/kg, i.v.) and fentanyl (4x40 microgram/kg, i.v.). These results indicate that the antinociceptive effects of morphine and fentanyl, two opiate analgesics widely used in humans in the management of pain, are blunted by concomitant NMDA-dependent opposing effects which are only revealed when the predominant antinociceptive effect is sharply blocked by naloxone. This study provides new rationale for beneficial adjunction of NMDA receptor antagonists with opiates for relieving pain by preventing pain facilitatory processes triggered by opiate treatment per se.