Do implant surfaces make a difference?

R M Meffert

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9655029

Do implant surfaces make a difference?

R M Meffert

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The synthetic biomaterials commonly used as an interface or surface for soft- and hard-tissue attachment and integration are commercially pure titanium, titanium alloy (usually Ti6A14V), and hydroxyapatite. This review attempts to address the following questions: Do the epithelium and connective tissue attach or adapt to these synthetic surfaces? Is there a seal or just a cuff in terms of the soft-tissue interface? Is hydroxyapatite, commercially pure titanium, or Ti6A14V more predictable and retentive? Is one better than the other or are all the same? Is there an advantage of one surface over the other in terms of bone-to-implant contact or shear strength when stressed? How about bone density and fixture length; is one surface better than any other?

Explore related subjects

Alloys Animals Dental Alloys Dental Implants Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Restoration Failure Durapatite Humans Osseointegration Outcome Assessment, Health Care Surface Properties Titanium Comparative Study Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R M Meffert. 1997. Do implant surfaces make a difference?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9655029/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Integrin-mediated signaling in osteoblasts on titanium implant materials.

The intracellular signaling pathway for osteoblast adhesion to the orthopedic implant material Ti6Al4V (TIV) was investigated and compared to integrin-mediated adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins. Primary osteoblasts from fetal rat calvaria were plated onto TIV, fibronectin (FN), and poly-L-lysine (PLL) and the levels of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and AP-1 transcription factors, c-fos and c-jun, were compared by Western and Northern blots. Cells on all substrates showed maximum FAK phosphorylation within 60 min and then a decrease at 2 and 24 h. However, the subsequent signal transduction pathway differed on PLL compared to TIV and FN. MAPK was phosphorylated similarly in osteoblasts attached to FN and TIV, whereas cells on PLL demonstrated no MAPK phosphorylation. On TIV and FN, c-fos and c-jun mRNA levels were maximal within 1 h and then plateaued or declined by 2 h. On PLL, they increased at 2 h. Within 1 h, c-fos protein was stimulated in cells attached to TIV and FN and decreased in cells on PLL. c-jun protein increased on all substrates compared to unplated cells. Cytoskeletal changes visualized by phalloidin fluorescence microscopy at 4 h of culture were delayed on TIV compared to FN. In addition, approximately 50% fewer cells adhered to TIV compared to FN or PLL. By 24 h, a well-spread cytoskeleton with focal adhesion sites was apparent on TIV and FN, but cells on PLL were rounded with minimal cell spreading. During 6 days of culture, cells on FN and TIV proliferated, whereas the number of cells on PLL remained the same or decreased, depending on the initial plating density. We conclude that osteoblast adhesion to TIV implants is similar to osteoblast adhesion to FN and leads to osteoblast proliferation. These data provide evidence for the biocompatibility of TIV at a molecular level.

Alloys↗

PubMed2000

The potential clinical and economic benefits of silver alloy urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. A recent meta-analysis concluded that silver alloy catheters reduce the incidence of UTI by 3-fold; however, clinicians must decide whether the efficacy of such catheters is worth the extra per unit cost of $5.30. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and economic impact of using silver alloy urinary catheters in hospitalized patients. METHODS: The decision model, performed from the health care payer's perspective, evaluated a simulated cohort of 1000 hospitalized patients on general medical, surgical, urologic, and intensive care services requiring short-term urethral catheterization (2-10 days). We compared 2 catheterization strategies: silver alloy catheters and standard (noncoated) urinary catheters. Outcomes included the incidence of symptomatic UTI and bacteremia and direct medical costs. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, use of silver-coated catheters led to a 47% relative decrease in the incidence of symptomatic UTI from 30 to 16 cases per 1000 patients (number needed to treat = 74) and a 44% relative decrease in the incidence of bacteremia from 4.5 to 2.5 cases per 1000 patients (number needed to treat = 500) compared with standard catheters. Use of silver alloy catheters resulted in estimated cost savings of $4.09 per patient compared with standard catheter use ($20.87 vs $16.78). In a multivariate sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation, silver-coated catheters provided clinical benefits over standard catheters in all cases and cost savings in 84% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Using silver alloy catheters in hospitalized patients requiring short-term urinary catheterization reduces the incidence of symptomatic UTI and bacteremia, and is likely to produce cost savings compared with standard catheters.

Alloys↗

PubMed2000

Biocompatibility of alloys used in orthodontics evaluated by cell culture tests.

The cytotoxicity of the most common alloys used in orthodontic appliances was determined by cell culture testing. Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured on 304 and 316 stainless steel, on brazing alloy composed of palladium (Pd), copper (Cu), and silver (Ag), and on plastic substrate (control). Studies were carried out with SEM and radiolabeled precursor incorporation. Cells were cultured in MEM without serum but with the addition of (3)H-thymidine to evaluate cell proliferation and (3)H-glucosamine to evaluate glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis and secretion in the culture medium. Moreover, gingival fibroblasts were cultured in the presence of some metal ions generally released by orthodontic appliances to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of single ions. Morphologic observations with SEM and radiolabeled incorporation studies showed that 304 and 316 stainless steel were more biocompatible than the brazing alloy. Among the metal ions tested, Ag and Pd, constituents of the brazing alloy, showed the highest cytotoxicity.

Alloys↗