Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9624819

Sampling in forensic comparison problems.

Abstract

When someone breaks glass a number of tiny fragments may be transferred to that person. If the glass is broken in the commission of a crime then these fragments may be used as evidence. If a large number of fragments are recovered from the suspect, then it may be more efficient for the forensic scientist to examine a subset of these fragments. Such sampling incurs information loss. This paper will derive an expression that allows a partial quantification of this loss. The loss of such information due to the examination of a subset of recovered material arises with many forms of evidence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Curran, C M Triggs, J Buckleton. Sampling in forensic comparison problems.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1355-0306(98)72086-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

["Self-inflicted injuries"--psychiatric, forensic and insurance aspects (II)].

German law distinguishes between attempted suicide which is not punishable and self-mutilation which is prohibited. This article describes the historical development of self-injurious behaviour, reviews the social, juridical, and ethical assessments of the past, and examines the statistical and biological results of current research. It relates observations from forensic medicine and psychiatry to specific clinical symptoms, toxicological circumstances, and social influences (stress incurred by everyday life, war, or imprisonment). Drawing on pertinent cases, it clarifies criminal and civil jurisdiction and emphasizes the importance of self-mutilation for private insurers. Intended for insurers, forensic scientists, and psychiatrists, recommendations concern the procedures to be followed in the examination, jurisdiction, and therapy involving cases of self-inflicted injuries.

Forensic Medicine

Anatomical variability of the frontal sinuses and their application in forensic identification.

The uniqueness of anatomical structures and their variations provides the basis for forensic identification of unknown deceased persons. Similar to fingerprints, each frontal sinus is so distinctive and unique that the chances of two individuals having the same morphology of the frontal sinuses is extremely remote. Radiographs, especially the occipitomental view commonly used in the assessment of paranasal pathology, provide excellent records of these sinuses. The case illustrated here is an application of the frontal sinus identification of a victim in a mass disaster.

Forensic Medicine