Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9543398

Missed cervical dissociation--recognizing and avoiding potential disaster.

Abstract

Complete cervical disruptions are high-energy injuries often associated with polytrauma and spinal cord injury. Because these injuries disrupt all anterior and posterior stabilizers, they result in a highly unstable spine, and the injuries are usually apparent on screening radiographs. Patients with these injuries must be identified and protected during the multiple diagnostic and surgical procedures they may require during their initial evaluation and treatment. Emergency procedures must be carefully prioritized relative to other life-threatening injuries; formal evaluation of the cervical spine may be carried out before, after, or in stages around other urgently indicated procedures. Until the cervical spine is cleared, careful observation of precautions can avoid disasterous complications in even the most unstable situation. A case of complete cervical disruption in a neurologically intact, hemodynamically unstable patient is presented for discussion. For polytraumatized patients with cervical dissociation, combined anterior and posterior stabilization is the treatment of choice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R F McLain, D R Benson. Missed cervical dissociation--recognizing and avoiding potential disaster.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-4679(97)00284-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Surgical treatment of cervical kyphosis in Larsen syndrome: report of 3 cases and review of the literature.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To review the surgical results for midcervical kyphosis in 3 cases with Larsen syndrome, and to discuss the choice of surgical treatments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical kyphosis is the most hazardous and serious manifestation of Larsen syndrome due to the risk of life-threatening paralysis, and thus usually requires surgical treatment. However, little information has been reported concerning surgical treatments for this challenging condition. METHODS: Three patients with Larsen syndrome were surgically treated for midcervical kyphosis at our institution. RESULTS: An infant with mild cervical kyphosis was successfully treated with posterior arthrodesis using a halo immobilization, and anterior vertebral growth with a mature posterior fusion mass resulted in spontaneous correction of the kyphosis. In the remaining 2 infants with myelopathic symptoms due to severe and structural kyphosis, anterior decompression and fusion via a lateral approach followed by posterior fusion with segmental spinal instrumentation and halo immobilization resulted in improved neurologic symptoms and solid fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior spinal fusion is only indicated for patients with mild and flexible cervical kyphosis, and anterior decompression and circumferential arthrodesis is required for patients with severe kyphotic deformity, who usually develop myelopathic symptoms. Anterior surgery for such a small patient with severe kyphosis involves much higher risk of spinal cord injury during decompression maneuvers and difficulty in stabilization of the reconstructed cervical spine. Therefore, all patients with Larsen syndrome should be screened with radiographs at the first visit to detect cervical kyphosis early so that posterior alone fusion is possible.

Cervical Vertebrae↗