Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9464767

Picture archiving communication system does not decrease the number of radiographs needed to evaluate the trauma patient.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Picture Archiving Communication System (PACS) is a sophisticated software and hardware package that enables clinicians to retrieve, review, and digitally manipulate radiographs from computer workstations throughout the hospital. PACS was instituted at Brooke Army Medical Center in July 1993. METHODS: Fifty consecutive trauma and 50 consecutive motor vehicle crash (MVC) trauma admissions to an urban trauma center were reviewed before PACS (January 1993) and 18 months after PACS was instituted (January 1995). Patients were compared by the number of radiographs needed during the initial evaluation by type and total. The trauma groups were subdivided by mechanism and also compared. Demographic and physiologic data were collected for each patient. RESULTS: There are no differences in the demographic and physiologic data between groups. For the 50 consecutive trauma admissions, only two areas of statistical difference were found: more chest films were obtained in the MVC PACS group and more pelvis films were obtained in the gunshot wound pre-PACS group. For the 50 consecutive MVC trauma admissions, the PACS group had more chest and total radiographs per patient than the pre-PACS group. More computed tomographic scans of the neck were obtained in the PACS group. CONCLUSION: PACS did not decrease the number of radiographs needed to adequately and fully evaluate the trauma patient.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Broughton, M Ilagan, J Jaffin. 1998. Picture archiving communication system does not decrease the number of radiographs needed to evaluate the trauma patient.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199801000-00023

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Early intervention in whiplash-associated disorders: a comparison of two treatment protocols.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial in 97 patients with a whiplash injury caused by a motor vehicle collision. OBJECTIVES: The study evaluates early active mobilization versus a standard treatment protocol and the importance of early versus delayed onset of treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no compelling evidence to date on the management of acute whiplash-associated disorders. The few studies describing treatment, however, provide evidence to support the recommendation that an active treatment in the acute stage is preferable to rest and a soft collar in most patients. METHODS: Patients were randomized to four groups. Active versus standard treatment and early (within 96 hours) versus delayed (after 2 weeks) treatment. Measures of range of motion and pain were registered initially and at 6 months. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (91%) could be followed up at 6 months. Active treatment reduced pain more than standard treatment (P < 0.001). When type and onset of treatment were analyzed, a combined effect was seen. When active treatment was provided, it was better when administered early, and if standard treatment was provided, it was better when administered late for reduction of pain (P = 0.04) and increasing cervical flexion (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with whiplash-associated disorders caused by a motor vehicle collision treatment with frequently repeated active submaximal movements combined with mechanical diagnosis and therapy is more effective in reducing pain than a standard program of initial rest, recommended use of a soft collar, and gradual self-mobilization. This therapy could be performed as home exercises initiated and supported by a physiotherapist.

Accidents, Traffic↗