PubMed · 940944
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A V Casey, K E Palmer, J M Stillman. 1976. A mammography test object.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/940944/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: High mammographic density is associated with increased breast cancer risk. Previous studies have shown that estrogens increase breast density on mammograms, but the effect on mammographic density of selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as raloxifene, is unknown. We assessed changes in mammographic density among women receiving placebo, raloxifene, or conjugated equine estrogens in an osteoporosis prevention trial. METHODS: In a 5-year multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled osteoporosis prevention trial, healthy postmenopausal women who had undergone hysterectomy less than 15 years before the study and had no history of breast cancer received placebo, raloxifene (at one of two doses), or conjugated estrogens (ERT). Women from English-speaking investigative sites who had baseline and 2-year craniocaudal mammograms with comparable positioning (n = 168) were eligible for this analysis. Changes in mammographic density were determined by digital scanning and computer-assisted segmentation of mammograms and were analyzed with the use of analysis of variance. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Among the four treatment groups after 2 years on study, the mean breast density (craniocaudal view) was statistically significantly greater in the ERT group than it was in the other three groups (P<0.01 for all three comparisons). Within treatment groups, the mean breast density from baseline to 2 years decreased statistically significantly in women receiving the placebo or either the higher or lower raloxifene dose (P = 0.003, P = 0.002, and P<0.001, respectively) and showed a nonstatistically significant increase in women receiving ERT. CONCLUSIONS: In an osteoporosis prevention trial, raloxifene did not increase breast density after 2 years of treatment. Raloxifene administration should not interfere with, and could even enhance, mammographic detection of new breast cancers.
Breast cancer is thought to originate through progressively aberrant precursor lesions, paralleled by increasing morphological changes. The aim of this study was to quantify nuclear features by image cytometry in invasive breast cancer and its early (hyperplasia) and late (ductal carcinoma in situ) precursor lesions, in order to objectively describe nuclear changes in the spectrum of proliferative intraductal and invasive breast lesions. Image cytometry was performed on tissue sections of 20 samples of normal breast tissue, 71 of usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), nine of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), and 11 of well-differentiated and 13 of poorly differentiated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. The invasive breast carcinomas consisted of 19 well-differentiated and 24 poorly differentiated lesions. Through the spectrum from normal breast tissue to invasive carcinoma, progressive changes in many nuclear features were measured. Significant differences were found between nuclei of florid ductal hyperplasia compared with mild and moderate ductal hyperplastic lesions, suggesting that florid ductal hyperplasia may be a more advanced lesion than assumed and may contain cancer precursor cells. No differences were found between ADH and well-differentiated DCIS, suggesting that these lesions are closely related. Feature values of well-differentiated DCIS were comparable to values found in well-differentiated invasive carcinoma and the same applied to poorly differentiated DCIS and invasive lesions. These results support the hypothesis that breast cancer develops through different routes of progression, one leading to well-differentiated invasive cancer through well-differentiated DCIS, and one leading to poorly differentiated invasive cancer through poorly differentiated DCIS. In conclusion, image cytometry reveals progressive changes in nuclear morphological and subvisual chromatin distribution features in the spectrum from intraductal proliferations to invasive breast cancer. This provides evidence for a progression from usual to atypical ductal hyperplasia and then to invasive cancer, through different routes for well-differentiated and poorly differentiated lesions.
The clonal nature of neoplastic lesions such as invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been widely proven by several proliferative, genetic or other malignancy-associated markers. The aim of this study is to clarify whether benign hyperplastic lesions such as ductal hyperplasia of usual type (DH) and papilloma can be distinguished from neoplastic lesions such as DCIS by X-chromosome inactivation analysis. Clonal analysis was performed using a polymerase chain reaction-based assay for non-random X-chromosome inactivation of the human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA). Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded archival tissue of ten DCIS, sixteen DH, nine papillomas, and seven normal terminal ductal lobular units (TDLUs) was laser-microdissected to avoid contamination with surrounding tissue. All of the cases analysed revealed a monoclonal origin. Furthermore, in one of these cases, opposite X chromosomes were inactivated within the same breast. X-linked inactivation analysis clearly demonstrates that, at least in the breast, monoclonality is not restricted to neoplastic processes. The data support the hypothesis that the mammary gland is organized into distinct stem cell-derived monoclonal patches and that TDLUs are monoclonal in origin. Any proliferative lesion arising within such a pre-existing clonal patch should therefore be clonal, irrespective of whether it originates from one or more patch cells. Thus, X-chromosome inactivation analysis cannot be considered a valid method for distinguishing between neoplastic and hyperplastic breast lesions.