Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Breast”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery. Provincial Breast Disease Site Group.

GUIDELINE QUESTIONS: 1) Should breast irradiation be given to women with early stage invasive breast cancer (stage I and II) following breast conservation surgery (lumpectomy with clear resection margins and axillary dissection)? 2) Is there an optimal schedule for breast irradiation? 3) What is a reasonable interval between definitive surgery and the start of breast irradiation? 4) Are there patients who can be spared breast irradiation after lumpectomy? OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations about the use of breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery. OUTCOMES: Local control is the primary endpoint of interest. Survival, quality of life (addressed through the adverse effects of radiotherapy) and cosmesis are also considered. PERSPECTIVE (VALUES): Evidence was selected and reviewed by 6 members of the Breast Disease Site Group (Breast DSG) of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. Earlier drafts of the evidence-based recommendation were reviewed, discussed and approved by the Breast DSG, which comprises medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, pathologists and a medical sociologist. There was no participation by a community representative in the development of this guideline. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: There are 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 meta-analysis comparing breast irradiation with no breast irradiation following breast conservation surgery; 6 randomized trials comparing breast conservation surgery plus breast irradiation with mastectomy are also included, as well as several retrospective studies. BENEFITS: All of the 5 RCTs showed a significant decrease in local recurrence rates among patients receiving radiotherapy. In the 4 trials with a median follow-up of 5 years or longer, the relative risk reduction with breast irradiation ranged from 69% to 88%. The absolute differences ranged from 16% (p < 0.001) to 25% (p < 0.001). Despite the effect on local recurrence, no difference in survival was detected in any of the 5 trials. Most of the patients with local recurrence in these trials underwent mastectomy. HARMS: Major adverse effects of breast irradiation occur very infrequently. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: Women with early stage invasive breast cancer (stage I and II) who have undergone breast conservation surgery should be offered postoperative breast irradiation. The optimal fractionation schedule for breast irradiation has not been established, and the role of boost irradiation is unclear. Outside of a clinical trial, 2 commonly used fractionation schedules are suggested: 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast, or 40 Gy in 16 fractions to the whole breast with a local boost to the primary site of 12.5 Gy in 5 fractions. Shorter schedules (e.g., 40 or 44 Gy in 16 fractions) have also been used routinely in some centres. The enrollment of patients in ongoing clinical trials is encouraged. Women who have undergone breast conservation surgery should receive local breast irradiation as soon as possible after wound healing. A safe interval between surgery and the start of radiotherapy is unknown, but it is reasonable to start breast irradiation within 12 weeks after definitive surgery. For women who are candidates for chemotherapy, the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and breast irradiation is unknown. It is reasonable to start radiotherapy after the completion of chemotherapy, or concurrently if anthracycline-containing regimens are not used. For further information, please refer to Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative's practice guideline "Surgical Management of Early Stage Invasive Breast Cancer (stage I and II)."

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Repeat breast-conserving surgery for in-breast local breast carcinoma recurrence: the potential role of partial breast irradiation.

Mastectomy is the current standard of care for in-breast local recurrence of breast carcinoma. The objective of the current study was to critically review the rationale for and the theoretic and actual risks and benefits of repeat breast-conserving surgery followed by partial breast irradiation (PBI) for in-breast local recurrence of breast carcinoma. The main outcomes of interest were local control and survival after in-breast local recurrence and side effects, complications, and cosmesis after reirradiation of the breast. The risk of local recurrence was not found to be eliminated with mastectomy; approximately 2-32% of patients treated with mastectomy develop a chest wall recurrence. The interpretation of local control rates in evaluating repeat breast-conserving surgery studies is difficult because of the lack of information regarding preoperative diagnostic mammography to rule out concurrent multicentric disease and microscopic margin status after surgery. Rates of subsequent local recurrence in these studies appeared to be between 19-50%, similar to reported rates of in-breast local recurrence in patients with a first diagnosis of breast carcinoma who were treated with conservative surgery without irradiation. Early follow-up studies of breast reirradiation suggest that catheter-based interstitial brachytherapy and standard external beam radiation therapy can be delivered to the breast more than once without significant side effects in most patients and with acceptable cosmesis in some patients. Mastectomy may not be necessary in all patients with an in-breast local recurrence of breast carcinoma. Recent advances in conformal radiation delivery and single-center published reports concerning repeat breast-conserving therapy support well designed prospective trials to formally test this hypothesis.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

A minimally invasive breast biopsy clinic: an innovative way to teach breast fellows how to perform breast ultrasound and ultrasound-guided breast procedures.

BACKGROUND: The ability to perform breast ultrasound and ultrasound-guided breast procedures are increasingly important skills for breast surgeons. Breast fellowship programs must develop programs to ensure adequate ultrasound training for breast fellows. METHODS: A Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy Clinic was established at the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center to provide breast fellows with comprehensive, hands-on, "live-patient" breast ultrasound training. RESULTS: From December 2004 though February 2005, 5 breast fellows received training in the Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy Clinic. Each fellow received a minimum of 18 weeks of "live-patient" experience. Although the learning curve varied among the fellows, all showed proficiency in performing breast ultrasound and ultrasound-guided core biopsies by the 12th week. A total of 39 patients with fibroadenomas underwent 62 ultrasound-guided procedures, including 30 vacuum-assisted percutaneous excisions, 16 cryoablations, and 16 core biopsies. CONCLUSION: The Minimally Invasive Breast Clinic model provided breast fellows with sufficient "live-patient" experience to enable confident performance of breast ultrasound and ultrasound-guided breast procedures. The selection of patients with fibroadenomas facilitated safe and efficient training without interfering with the management of cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed about 90% of the worldwide epidemiological evidence on the relation between risk of breast cancer and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). METHODS: Individual data on 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer from 51 studies in 21 countries were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. The main analyses are based on 53,865 postmenopausal women with a known age at menopause, of whom 17,830 (33%) had used HRT at some time. The median age at first use was 48 years, and 34% of ever-users had used HRT for 5 years or longer. Estimates of the relative risk of breast cancer associated with the use of HRT were obtained after stratification of all analyses by study, age at diagnosis, time since menopause, body-mass index, parity, and the age a woman was when her first child was born. FINDINGS: Among current users of HRT or those who ceased use 1-4 years previously, the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed increased by a factor of 1.023 (95% CI 1.011-1.036; 2p=0.0002) for each year of use; the relative risk was 1.35 (1.21-1.49; 2p=0.00001) for women who had used HRT for 5 years or longer (average duration of use in this group 11 years). This increase is comparable with the effect on breast cancer of delaying menopause, since among never-users of HRT the relative risk of breast cancer increases by a factor of 1.028 (95% CI 1.021-1.034) for each year older at menopause. 5 or more years after cessation of HRT use, there was no significant excess of breast cancer overall or in relation to duration of use. These main findings did not vary between individual studies. Of the many factors examined that might affect the relation between breast cancer risk and use of HRT, only a woman's weight and body-mass index had a material effect: the increase in the relative risk of breast cancer associated with long durations of use in current and recent users was greater for women of lower than of higher weight or body-mass index. There was no marked variation in the results according to hormonal type or dose but little information was available about long durations of use of any specific preparation. Cancers diagnosed in women who had ever used HRT tended to be less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in never-users. In North America and Europe the cumulative incidence of breast cancer between the ages of 50 and 70 in never-users of HRT is about 45 per 1000 women. The cumulative excess numbers of breast cancers diagnosed between these ages per 1000 women who began use of HRT at age 50 and used it for 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, are estimated to be 2 (95% CI 1-3), 6 (3-9), and 12 (5-20). Whether HRT affects mortality from breast cancer is not known. INTERPRETATION: The risk of having breast cancer diagnosed is increased in women using HRT and increases with increasing duration of use. This effect is reduced after cessation of use of HRT and has largely, if not wholly, disappeared after about 5 years. These findings should be considered in the context of the benefits and other risks associated with the use of HRT.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Variability in surface antigen expression of human breast epithelial cells cultured from normal breast, normal tissue peripheral to breast carcinomas, and breast carcinomas.

Single-cell heterogeneity and variability in expression of several surface antigens on human mammary epithelial cells in short-term culture were studied with immunofluorescence techniques, using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. The cultures, derived from normal breast, a fibroadenoma, a gynecomastia, normal breast tissue peripheral to breast carcinomas, and breast carcinomas and their metastases, were studied after one passage in vitro. The percentage of positive cells varied considerably from one tissue sample to another in all categories from normal to malignant, although there was an overall trend toward a decreasing percentage of positive cells of malignant tissues. The relative antigen content varied 3- to 8-fold among individual samples of cells from normal, peripheral, and carcinoma tissue, while the mean values in the three categories were similar. The single-cell variability in relative antigen content was considerable in all individual samples of normal, peripheral, and carcinoma tissues, as reflected in the high coefficients of variation. However, the coefficients of variation were significantly higher for cells from carcinoma and peripheral tissues [69 +/- 10% (S.E.) and 75 +/- 9%, respectively] than for cells from normal breast (48 +/- 5%). By analyzing in clonal colonies the appearance of quantitative variants in expression of a specific surface antigen, detected with a monoclonal antibody, the carcinoma cells were found to have a 10-fold higher rate of phenotypic variability (mean, 1.21 X 10(-2)/cell/generation) than did cells from normal breast (mean, 0.119 X 10(-2)) and one gynecomastia (0.045 X 10(-2)). Mammary epithelial cells from apparently "normal" tissue peripheral to a carcinoma had an intermediate rate of phenotypic variability (mean, 0.310 X 10(-2)) that was significantly higher than that of the normal tissue.

Adenofibroma↗
PubMed2005

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy: outcomes of salvage mastectomy vs. salvage breast-conserving surgery and prognostic factors for salvage breast preservation.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of salvage mastectomy (SM) and salvage breast-conserving surgery (SBCS) and study the feasibility of SBCS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 2,038 patients treated with breast-conserving therapy at Yale-New Haven Hospital before 1999, 166 sustained an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Outcomes and prognostic factors of patients treated with SM or SBCS were compared. Patients were considered amenable to SBCS if the recurrence was localized on mammogram and physical examination, and had pathologic size < 3 cm, confined to the biopsy site, without skin or lymphovascular invasion, and with < or = 3 positive nodes. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients definitively managed at IBTR, surgery was SM (n = 116) or SBCS (n = 30). The median length of follow-up after IBTR was 13.8 years. The SM and SBCS cohorts had no significant differences, except at IBTR the SM cohort had a greater tumor size (p = 0.049). Of the SM cohort, 65.5% were considered appropriate for SBCS, and a localized relapse was predicted by estrogen-receptor positive, diploid, and detection of recurrence by mammogram. Multicentric disease correlated with BRCA1/2 mutation, estrogen-receptor negative, lymph node positive at relapse, and detection of recurrence by physical examination. Survival after IBTR was 64.5% at 10 years, with no significant difference between SM (65.7%) and SBCS (58.0%). Only 2 patients in the SBCS cohort subsequently had a second IBTR, and were salvaged with mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: While mastectomy is considered the standard surgical salvage of IBTR, SBCS is feasible and prognostic factors are related to favorable tumor biology and early detection. Patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutations may be less appropriate for SBCS, as multicentric disease was more prevalent. Patients who underwent SBCS had comparable outcomes as those who underwent SM, but remain at continued risk for IBTR. A prospective trial evaluating repeat lumpectomy and partial breast reirradiation is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM stage I and II breast cancer.

A (modified) radical mastectomy (RM) was compared with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in stage I and stage II breast cancer patients. Treatment of the study arm comprised lumpectomy, axillary clearance and radiotherapy to the breast (50 Gy in 5 weeks external irradiation and a boost with iridium implant of 25 Gy). 902 patients were included. There were 734 TNM stage II patients. Patients with microscopically incomplete excision of the tumour were not excluded. After a median follow-up of 6 years, overall survival and local recurrence rates do not differ significantly between the two study arms. Actuarial survival at 8 years was 73% after RM and 71% after BCT; actuarial local recurrence at 8 years was 9% and 15%, respectively. In the mastectomy group tumour size did not affect local relapse, but after BCT the incidence of local recurrences was higher for tumours of 2-5 cm (16%) than for smaller tumours (7%) (at 8 years, P = 0.08). Results of salvage treatment for local recurrence so far were similar in both the BCT and the mastectomy group.

Aging↗
PubMed1994

Western blotting and enzymatic activity analysis of cathepsin D in breast tissue and sera of patients with breast cancer and benign breast disease and of normal controls.

Increased total antigen amounts of cathepsin D in breast tissue have been reported to be associated with increased disease recurrence, more frequent metastasis, and increased mortality in breast cancer patients. In the present study, Western blotting analysis has been used for the first time to determine the relative amounts of precursor and processed forms of cathepsin D in sera and breast tissue of patients with breast cancer, benign breast disease, and normal controls. Sera gave similar blots for breast cancer patients and controls with two major forms of cathepsin D (M(r) 52,000 and 27,000). Malignant breast tissue contained the two forms of cathepsin D found in sera and an additional M(r) 31,000 form which was found in significantly increased (P < 0.001) relative amounts in breast tissue from 43 breast cancer patients [24 +/- 12% (SD)] when compared to 51 benign breast disease patients (13 +/- 8.9%) and 23 normal controls (1.8 +/- 4.4%). Preliminary analysis of subgroups of benign breast disease patients suggested no significant difference (P = 0.41) in relative amounts of the M(r) 31,000 form of cathepsin D between proliferative-type and non-proliferative-type fibrocystic breast disease. A cathepsin D assay has been optimized for human breast tissue and used to demonstrate for the first time significantly increased (P < 0.001) amounts of pepstatin-inhibitable, cathepsin D-specific activity in breast tissue from 36 breast cancer patients (2.2 +/- 1.4 units/mg of protein) when compared to 47 benign breast disease patients (0.63 +/- 0.43) and 23 normal controls (0.24 +/- 0.21). Preliminary analysis of subgroups of benign breast disease patients suggested no significant difference (P = 0.21) in pepstatin-inhibitable, cathepsin D-specific activity between proliferative-type and nonproliferative-type fibrocystic breast disease. The positive correlation (r = 0.82) of increased amounts of the M(r) 31,000 form of cathepsin D and increased pepstatin-inhibitable, cathepsin D enzymatic activity in malignant breast tissue suggests that the M(r) 31,000 form is the proteolytically active form of the enzyme which may be involved in the development and/or metastatic spread of breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Does breast size affect the scatter dose to the ipsilateral lung, heart, or contralateral breast in primary breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between the primary breast volume and dose received by the ipsilateral lung, heart (for left-breast cancers), and contralateral breast during primary breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-five patients with breast carcinoma were treated using 6-MV photons with IMRT technique using the Eclipse Planning System following breast conserving surgery. All patients had a treatment planning CT scan. The primary breast, ipsilateral lung, and heart were contoured on the axial CT slices. The primary breast volume was calculated using the Eclipse Planning System. The mean ipsilateral lung and heart doses were obtained from the dose-volume histogram. The contralateral breast dose was measured using paired thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) placed on the patient's contralateral breast, 4 cm from the center of the medial border of the primary breast irradiation field. RESULTS: The mean dose delivered with photons to the primary breast for all patients was 49.97 Gy. The mean volume of the primary irradiated breast was 1167.9 cc. As a percentage, the mean ipsilateral lung, heart, and contralateral breast doses were 11.2%, 6.1%, and 7.2%, respectively. The primary breast volume positively correlated with the contralateral breast dose (P < 0.0005). There was no significant correlation between the breast volume and the ipsilateral lung or heart dose (P = 0.463 and 0.943, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the primary breast size significantly affects the scatter dose to the contralateral breast but not the ipsilateral lung or heart dose when using IMRT for breast irradiation.

Breast↗
PubMed2001

Knowledge about breast cancer risk factors and hereditary breast cancer among early-onset breast cancer survivors.

Little is known about knowledge levels regarding hereditary breast cancer among breast cancer survivors. This study explored, among women with early-onset breast cancer (<50 years): 1) knowledge regarding breast cancer risk factors and hereditary breast cancer; and 2) differences in knowledge based on risk for hereditary disease. Participants recruited from 34 Virginia hospitals responded to two questionnaires. The Family History Questionnaire assessed risk for hereditary breast cancer. The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Questionnaire evaluated knowledge of general breast cancer risk factors and hereditary breast cancer. Of 314 respondents, 273 (87%) returned both questionnaires. A total of 137 (52%) participants met the study's criteria for hereditary breast cancer risk. Most participants knew common breast cancer-associated risk factors, including family history of breast cancer. Only 35% recognized family history of non-breast malignancies as a risk factor for breast cancer. Most participants recognized that prophylactic mastectomy does not eliminate breast cancer risk (63%), that not all women carrying a mutation develop disease (73%), and that men can develop breast cancer (96%). The majority selected 'I don't know' for knowledge of several characteristics of hereditary breast cancer, including: early-onset disease (54%); multifocal or bilateral disease (62%); risk transmission through fathers (58%); association with other cancer types (61%); and male breast cancer (70%). Knowledge regarding hereditary breast cancer did not vary between women with suspected hereditary disease and those with presumed sporadic disease. These data highlight the need for information regarding hereditary breast cancer for early-onset breast cancer survivors.

Age of Onset↗
PubMed2006

Insulin-like growth factor-1 genotype predicts breast volume after pregnancy and hormonal contraception and is associated with circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 levels: implications for risk of early-onset breast cancer in young women from hereditary breast cancer families.

BACKGROUND: BRCA1/2 mutations predispose to early-onset breast cancer, especially after oral contraceptive (OC) use and pregnancy. However, the majority of breast cancers might be due to more prevalent low penetrance genes that may also modify the risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. The absence of the IGF1 19-CA repeat allele has been associated with high insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels during OC use in nulliparous women of four different ethnic groups. High IGF-1 levels are linked to an increased risk of early-onset breast cancer and to larger breast volumes in the general population. It has also been hypothesized that women whose breast size increases while exposed to OCs may be at increased risk of future breast cancer. AIM: We explored the effect of the IGF1 genotype, specifically the absence of the common 19-CA repeat allele in the promoter region of the IGF1 gene, in combination with oral contraceptive (OC) use or parity on breast volume and IGF-1 levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-eight healthy women, </=40 years old, from hereditary breast cancer families participated in this prospective study. Twenty-three women were known BRCA1 mutation carriers, 7 women were known BRCA2 mutation carriers, 54 women were noncarriers from BRCA1/2 families, 111 women belonged to breast cancer families where no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were detected, and 63 women were untested from high-risk breast cancer families. All women completed a questionnaire including information on reproductive factors and OC use. We measured height, weight, breast volumes, and plasma IGF-1 levels once during menstrual cycle days 5-10 and once again during menstrual cycle days 18-23. The IGF1 genotype was successfully analyzed with polymerase chain reaction and fragment analyses in 254 women. RESULTS: Thirteen percent had no IGF1 19-CA repeat allele. The absence of the 19-CA repeat allele was more common among women with known BRCA1 mutations compared to other women (26% versus 12%; P= 0.05). See updated and revised Table 1 from original publication. IGF-1 levels were similar among parous and nulliparous women not using OCs, which is in contrast to results from women in the general population, where parous women have lower IGF-1 levels than nulliparous women. Furthermore, OC use did not affect IGF-1 levels in parous women in our study. BRCA mutation status did not affect age-adjusted IGF-1 levels in either cycle phase among nonusers. Most of the nulliparous OC users had lower IGF-1 levels than nonusers. However, there was an interaction between IGF1 genotype and OC use on IGF-1 levels in nulliparous women (P= 0.026). Compared with nonusers, IGF-1 levels were highly suppressed in OC users with a 19-CA repeat allele (P < 0.001), but not among women lacking the 19-CA repeat allele (P= 0.81). We also observed an interaction between parity and IGF1 genotype on breast volume (P= 0.01). Absence of the 19-CA repeat allele was associated with larger breast volumes in parous versus nulliparous women and OC users, while parous women and OC users with the 19-CA repeat allele had smaller breast volumes than nulliparous women and nonusers adjusted for body weight. During follow-up, six incident breast cancers cases occurred, four in known BRCA1 mutation carriers and two in untested women. Incident breast cancers were associated with absence of the 19-CA repeat allele (log-rank; P= 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that absence of the IGF1 19-CA repeat allele modifies IGF-1 levels, breast volume, and possibly early-onset breast cancer risk after hormone exposure in young, high-risk women. These results warrant confirmation in a larger prospective cohort of high-risk women. If confirmed, the IGF1 genotype could be incorporated as an additional marker to improve risk estimates for early-onset breast cancer during genetic counseling of women from high-risk breast cancer families.

Age of Onset↗
PubMed1996

Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies.

BACKGROUND The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on the relation between breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. METHODS Individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 studies conducted in 25 countries were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Estimates of the relative risk for breast cancer were obtained by a modification of the Mantel-Haenszel method. All analyses were stratified by study, age at diagnosis, parity, and, where appropriate, the age a woman was when her first child was born, and the age she was when her risk of conception ceased. FINDINGS The results provide strong evidence for two main conclusions. First, while women are taking combined oral contraceptives and in the 10 years after stopping there is a small increase in the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed (relative risk [95 percent CI] in current users 1.24 [1.15-1.33], 2p<0.00001; 1-4 years after stopping 1.16 [1.08-1.23], 2p=0.00001; 5-9 years after stopping 1.07 [1.02-1.13], 2p=0.009). Second, there is no significant excess risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after stopping use (relative risk 1.01 [0.96-1.05], NS). The cancers diagnosed in women who had used combined oral contraceptives were less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in women who had never used these contraceptives for ever-users compared with never-users, the relative risk for tumours that had spread beyond the breast compared with localised tumours was 0.88 (0.81-0.95; 2p=0.002). There was no pronounced variation in the results for recency of use between women with different background risks of breast cancer, including women from different countries and ethnic groups, women with different reproductive histories, and those with or without a family history of breast cancer. The studies included in this collaboration represent about 90 percent of the epidemiological information on the topic, and what is known about the other studies suggests that their omission has not materially affected the main conclusions. Other features of hormonal contraceptive use such as duration of use, age at first use, and the dose and type of hormone within the contraceptives had little additional effect on breast cancer risk, once recency of use had been taken into account. Women who began use before age 20 had higher relative risks of having breast cancer diagnosed while they were using combined oral contraceptives and in the 5 years after stopping than women who began use at older ages, but the higher relative risks apply at ages when breast cancer is rare and, for a given duration of use, earlier use does not result in more cancers being diagnosed than use beginning at older ages. Because breast cancer incidence rises steeply with age, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed in the period between starting use and 10 years after stopping increases with age at last use: for example, among 10 000 women from Europe or North America who used oral contraceptives from age 16 to 19, from age 20 to 24, and from age 25 to 29, respectively, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed up to 10 years after stopping use is 0.5 (95 percent CI 0.3-0.7), 1.5 (0.7-2.3), and 4.7 (2.7-6.7). Up to 20 years after cessation of use the difference between ever-users and never-users is not so much in the total number of cancers diagnosed, but in their clinical presentation, with the breast cancers diagnosed in ever-users being less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in never-users. The relation observed between breast cancer risk and hormone exposure is unusual, and it is not possible to infer from these data whether it is due to an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in ever-users, the biological effects of hormonal contraceptives, or a combination of reasons...

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Breast-feeding at 12 months of age and dietary habits among breast-fed and non-breast-fed infants.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse factors associated with breast-feeding and use of sweetened drinks at 12 months, and to compare dietary habits among breast-fed and non-breast-fed infants. DESIGN: Data were collected by a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire filled in by the parents. SETTING: National dietary survey in Norway. SUBJECTS: In total, 1932 12-month-old infants were included. RESULTS: At 12 months, 36% of the infants were breast-fed. The odds of breast-feeding at this age were more than doubled both for mothers > or =35 years compared with mothers <25 years and for mothers in the highest educational group compared with mothers in the lowest. A negative association was found for maternal smoking, and the odds of breast-feeding were 40% lower for mothers who smoked than for non-smokers. Some dietary differences were observed between breast-fed and non-breast-fed infants apart from intake of milk. In particular, breast-fed infants had a significantly lower daily intake of sweetened drinks than non-breast-fed infants and a 16% lower mean daily intake of added sugars (P<0.001). Furthermore, breast-fed infants had 30% higher odds of not receiving sweetened drinks daily, compared with non-breast-fed infants. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal age, education and smoking status were important factors for breast-feeding at 12 months. Breast-fed infants had lower intakes of sweetened drinks and added sugars than non-breast-fed infants. From a public health perspective, continued promotion of breast-feeding is needed to reduce inequalities in breast-feeding. Moreover, prevention of high intakes of sweetened drinks and added sugars should start in infancy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

CONTEXT: Among cancer-free women aged 35 years or older, tamoxifen reduced the incidence of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive but not ER-negative breast cancer. The effect of tamoxifen on breast cancer incidence among women at extremely high risk due to inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of tamoxifen on incidence of breast cancer among cancer-free women with inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Genomic analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 for 288 women who developed breast cancer after entry into the randomized, double-blind Breast Cancer Prevention Trial of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (between April 1, 1992, and September 30, 1999). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Among women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, incidence of breast cancer among those who were receiving tamoxifen vs incidence of breast cancer among those receiving placebo. RESULTS: Of the 288 breast cancer cases, 19 (6.6%) inherited disease-predisposing BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Of 8 patients with BRCA1 mutations, 5 received tamoxifen and 3 received placebo (risk ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-10.70). Of 11 patients with BRCA2 mutations, 3 received tamoxifen and 8 received placebo (risk ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-1.56). From 10 studies, including this one, 83% of BRCA1 breast tumors were ER-negative, whereas 76% of BRCA2 breast tumors were ER-positive. CONCLUSION: Tamoxifen reduced breast cancer incidence among healthy BRCA2 carriers by 62%, similar to the reduction in incidence of ER-positive breast cancer among all women in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. In contrast, tamoxifen use beginning at age 35 years or older did not reduce breast cancer incidence among healthy women with inherited BRCA1 mutations. Whether tamoxifen use at a younger age would reduce breast cancer incidence among healthy women with BRCA1 mutations remains unknown.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Risk of breast cancer recurrence and contralateral breast cancer in relation to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status following breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations are associated with a strong risk of breast cancer, which may preclude breast-conserving treatment in carriers. This study examined whether mutation status influenced the rate of breast cancer recurrence following breast-conserving treatment. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened for germline mutations in 131 patients with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, who had been treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. The 131 patients with familial history were matched to 261 patients without, according to age at diagnosis and year of treatment. The follow-up of controls was at least equal to the time-interval between diagnosis and genetic testing in familial cases. Matched cohorts were compared according to rates of breast cancer recurrence as first event and contralateral breast cancer using log-rank tests. BRCA1/2 mutations were found in 20.6% patients with a family history. Nineteen patients had a BRCA1 mutation and 8 had a BRCA2 mutation. Breast cancers in mutation carriers were more often grade III (p<10-4) and oestrogen receptor negative (p=0.005) than tumours in both non-carriers and controls. Median follow-up for all 392 patients was 8.75 years. No significant differences in breast cancer recurrence as first event were seen between BRCA1/2 tumours and controls (p=0.47), carriers and non-carriers with a family history (p=0.96), or non-carriers and controls (p=0.10). On multivariate analysis, age was the most important factor significantly predicting for breast cancer recurrence. The rate of contralateral breast cancer was significantly increased in all patients with a family history: BRCA1/2 carriers versus controls (p=0.0003), non-carriers versus controls (p=0.0034) and carriers versus non-carriers (p=0.02). At a 9-year median follow-up, the rate of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence was not higher in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers than in non-carriers with a family history or sporadic cases. These results support the hypothesis that breast tumours in BRCA carriers are more sensitive to radiation. Therefore, breast-conserving treatment can be offered to these patients. However, longer follow-up is needed to ensure that the rate of new primary cancer in the treated breast does not increase in the long-term.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Relative effect of steroid hormone receptors on the prognosis of patients with operable breast cancer. A univariate and multivariate analysis of 3089 Japanese patients with breast cancer from the Study Group for the Japanese Breast Cancer Society on Hormone Receptors and Prognosis in Breast Cancer.

In a retrospective multicenter study to investigate the correlation between estrogen (ER) and/or progesterone receptors (PgR) in primary breast cancer with patient prognosis, 3118 patients with operable breast cancer (International Union Against Cancer Stages I, II, and III) were investigated from ten hospitals in Japan who underwent surgery from October 1972 to December 1982; 3089 were evaluable. The ER-positive and PgR-positive cancers were found in 56% and 34% of patients, respectively. The positivities decreased as the tumor size increased but were independent on lymph node metastasis. There were no significant differences in relapse-free survival (RFS) in relation to receptor status (median follow-up, 89 months [ER], 84 months [PgR]). However, in patients with four or more positive nodes, those with PgR-positive cancer had a longer RFS. The patients with ER-positive cancer survived significantly longer than ER-negative ones, with the greatest difference seen in those with four or more positive nodes. There was a significantly longer postrelapse survival (PRS) for patients with ER-positive cancer because of the different distribution of the major metastasis and better responses to first-line and subsequent treatments. Cox's multivariate analysis showed that overall survival but not PRS was affected by ER (and more weakly by PgR) because of the longer PRS in patients with ER-positive cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Ten-year results of the treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma in elderly women using breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: The optimal management of breast cancer in elderly women is not well established. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the outcome of breast cancer in elderly women treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analysis was performed of 558 women age > or = 50 years treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for Stages I-II invasive carcinoma of the breast. Of the 558 total women, there were 173 elderly women > or = 65 years and a comparison group of 385 women age 50-64 years. Treatment for all women included complete gross excision of the primary tumor, pathologic axillary lymph node staging, and definitive breast irradiation. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was used in 18% (102 out of 558) of the overall group. Adjuvant tamoxifen was used in 17% (94 out of 558) of the overall group. The median follow-up after treatment was 6.2 years (mean = 6.4 years; range = 0.1-15.4 years). RESULTS: Elderly patients age > or = 65 years and patients age 50-64 years were both found to have tumors with adverse prognostic features, including clinical T2 lesions (43 vs. 34%, respectively; p = 0.055), estrogen receptor negativity (9 vs. 16%, respectively; p = 0.13), and progesterone receptor negativity (17 vs. 21%, respectively; p = 0.50). Pathologic axillary lymph node staging showed that 24% of the elderly women were node positive, including 8% with four or more positive nodes, which was not different from women age 50-64 years (p = 0.23). There was no difference between the two age groups for the rate of deaths from breast cancer at 10 years (13 vs. 13%, respectively; p = 0.71). However, there was a significant difference between the two age groups for the rate of deaths from intercurrent disease at 10 years (11 vs. 2%, respectively; p = 0.0006). There were no differences between the two age groups for the 10-year rates of overall survival (77 vs. 85%, respectively; p = 0.14), relapse-free survival (64 vs. 70%, respectively; p = 0.16), freedom from distant metastases (83 vs. 78%, respectively; p = 0.45), or local failure (13 vs. 12%, respectively; p = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: These results have shown that breast carcinomas in elderly women are not indolent and have a number of adverse prognostic features. Breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation in elderly women age > or = 65 years achieves good outcomes for survival, freedom from distant metastases, and local control, which are comparable to women age 50-64 years. The causes of deaths in elderly women age > or = 65 years are from both breast cancer and intercurrent disease. Breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation should continue to be considered as a standard treatment option for appropriately selected elderly women with early-stage breast cancer.

Aged↗