PubMed · 9341068
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J R Biddle. 1997-10-15. Amiodarone and thyroid function.. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_1-199710150-00020
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Review of available data suggests that serial drug testing in patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias using various antiarrhythmic drugs including amiodarone is able to identify subgroups with favorable and unfavorable outcome (patient groups with suppression vs. no suppression of inducibility of VT/VF). These results more likely reflect patient selection rather than drug effects, thus limiting the role of electrophysiologically guided antiarrhythmic therapy to actively modify outcome. All major and actual antiarrhythmic drug trials including an amiodarone arm, have chosen to deliver this drug empirically in both patients with asymptomatic as well as severely symptomatic life-threatening sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias instead of a guided approach. The empiric approach is therefore adequate until new valid data comparing the empiric with the guidedor the invasive with the non invasiveapproach tell us otherwise.
BACKGROUND: To overcome the side effects of amiodarone (AM), its noniodinated analogue, dronedarone (SR), was synthesized. In this study, its electrophysiological effects were compared with those of AM in rabbit hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five animal groups (n=7 each) for 3 weeks received daily oral treatment of 1 of these regimens: (1) control, vehicle only; (2) AM 50 mg/kg (AM50); (3) AM 100 mg/kg (AM100); (4) SR 50 mg/kg (SR50); and (5) SR 100 mg/kg (SR100). ECGs were recorded before drug and at 3 weeks of drug before euthanasia. Action potentials were recorded from isolated papillary muscle and sinoatrial node by microelectrode techniques. The short-term effects were studied in controls (n=5) at various concentrations of SR (0 to 10 micromol/L) in tissue bath. Action potential duration at 50% (APD(50)) and 90% (APD(90)) repolarization and upstroke dV/dt (V(max)) at various cycle lengths were compared by ANOVA with repeated measures. Compared with control, AM and SR increased RR, QT, and QTc intervals (P<0.0001 for all). Ventricular APD(50) and APD(90) were lengthened by 20% to 49% as a function of dose (P<0.005 to <0.0001) and cycle length (P<0.001). SR100 effects were greater than those of AM100 (P<0.002). V(max) was decreased by both AM100 (P<0.0001) and SR100 (P<0.01). Sinoatrial node automaticity was slowed in treated groups compared with that of the control group (P<0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The electrophysiological effects of dronedarone are similar to those of AM but more potent, despite deletion of iodine from its molecular structure, a finding of importance for the development of future class III antiarrhythmic compounds.
We describe an elderly woman who presented with significant hyponatremia caused by the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) during therapy with amiodarone. The hyponatremia resolved after discontinuation of the drug and did not recur during a follow-up period of 6 months. Such an association has previously been reported only once in the medical literature. Since severe hyponatremia can produce significant neurologic damage and is associated with a high mortality rate, clinicians should be aware that this complication may occur during amiodarone therapy.