Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9260699

Does an open access system properly utilize endoscopic resources?

G Zuccaro·K Provencher
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In an effort to maintain procedure volumes and control consultation costs, many gastrointestinal endoscopists and primary care providers have implemented systems of open access endoscopy. In these systems, specialists in digestive diseases perform endoscopy without prior consultation. The purpose of this study is to determine if indications for upper endoscopic procedures requested in an open access system conform to national practice guidelines and to establish the yield of diagnostic information relevant for patient care in this system. METHODS: Procedural indications and results for 3715 upper endoscopic procedures performed in an open access system were recorded in a computer database. The practice guideline "Appropriate Use of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy" (AUGE) of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy was used to determine appropriateness of procedural indications. RESULTS: Eighty-four percent of procedures were performed for indications listed in the AUGE, and 59% resulted in findings relevant to patient care. Specialists requested endoscopy more frequently for "approved" indications than did nonspecialists (p = .004) and more frequently had findings relevant to patient care (p < .001). Findings relevant to patient care are significantly more frequent for some indications listed in the AUGE compared to others (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to practice guidelines can and does occur in an open access system. Specialists request endoscopy more frequently for appropriate indications compared to nonspecialists and have a higher yield of information relevant to patient care. Further refinement and better definition of some indications within the AUGE are needed to increase the clinical utility of this document.

Explore related subjects

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalGastroenterologyGastrointestinal DiseasesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Societies, MedicalUnited StatesComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Zuccaro, K Provencher. 1997. Does an open access system properly utilize endoscopic resources?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70203-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Sporadic ganglioneuromatosis of esophagogastric junction in a patient with gastro-esophageal reflux disorder and intestinal metaplasia.

A 58-year-old female with a recurrent history of upper abdominal pain and intermittent dysphagia underwent endoscopic evaluation that demonstrated an irregular and nodular esophago-gastric (EG) junction and grade I erosive esophagitis. Biopsies showed prominent intestinal metaplasia of Barrett's type without dysplasia, chronic inflammation and multiple aggregates of large cells within the mucosal lamina propria, some with spindle shaped nuclei. Immunohistochemistry stains for keratins AE-1/AE-3 were negative, while S-100 and NSE were positive. This, together with routine stains, was diagnostic for mucosal ganglioneuromatosis. The background of chronic inflammation with intestinal type metaplasia was consistent with long-term reflux esophagitis. No evidence of achalasia was seen. Biopsies of gastric antrum and fundus were unremarkable, without ganglioneural proliferation. Colonoscopy was unremarkable. No genetic syndromes were identified in the patient including familial adenomatous polyposis and multiple endocrine neoplasia type IIb (MEN IIb). Iansoprazole (Prevacid) was started by oral administration each day with partial relief of symptoms. Subsequent esophagogastroscopy repeated at 4 mo showed normal appearing EG junction. Esophageal manometry revealed a mild non-specific lower esophageal motility disorder. Mild motor dysfunction is seen with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and we feel that the demonstration of localized ganglioneuromatosis was not likely related etiologically. In the absence of findings that might suggest neural hypertrophy, such as achalasia, the nodular mucosal irregularity seen with this instance of ganglioneuromatosis may, however, have exacerbated the patient's reflux.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed2006

Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) on surgical decision-making in upper gastrointestinal tract cancer: an international multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an integrated part of the pretherapeutic evaluation program for patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancer. Whether the clinical impact of EUS differs between surgeons from different countries is unknown. The same applies to the potential clinical influence of EUS misinterpretations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement on predefined treatment strategies between surgeons from four different countries, with and without EUS, and to evaluate the clinical consequences of EUS misinterpretations. METHODS: One hundred patients with upper GI tract cancer were randomly selected from all upper GI tract cancer patients treated at Odense University Hospital between 1997 and 2000. Based on patient records and EUS database results, a case story was created with and without the EUS result for each patient. Four surgeons were asked to select the relevant treatment strategy in each case, at first without knowledge of the EUS and thereafter with the EUS result available. Interobserver agreement and impact of EUS misinterpretations were evaluated using the actual final treatment of each patient as reference. RESULTS: Three of four or all four surgeons agreed on the same treatment strategy for nearly 60% of the patients with and without the EUS results. Treatment decisions were changed in 34% based on the EUS results, and the majority of these changes were toward nonsurgical and palliative treatments (85%). Interobserver agreement was relatively low, but overall EUS increased kappa values from 0.16 ("poor") to 0.33 ("fair"), thus indicating increased overall agreement after the EUS results were available. EUS conclusion regarding stage or resectability was wrong in 17% of the cases, but only one serious event would have been the clinical result of EUS misinterpretations. CONCLUSION: Despite being used in different ways by different surgeons, EUS did change patient management in one third of the cases. The impact of EUS misinterpretations seemed very low, and this study confirmed one of the strongest clinical possibilities of EUS, i.e., the ability to detect nonresectable cases. EUS is an important imaging modality for oncosurgeons from different countries.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗