PubMed · 9250033
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Elliott. 1997. High-dependency nursing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1036-7314(97)70707-0
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of ropinirole with bromocriptine over 3 years in patients with early PD with limited or no previous dopaminergic therapy. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, parallel-group study, 335 patients were randomized to 0.75 mg ropinirole or 1.25 mg bromocriptine titrated upward at weekly intervals--maximum permitted daily doses were 24 mg ropinirole, 40 mg bromocriptine. RESULTS: Approximately one third of patients in each group withdrew prematurely, mostly because of adverse experiences; 61/102 (60%) of ropinirole-treated and 59/112 (53%) of bromocriptine-treated patients completed the study on the dopamine agonist alone. Mean doses for all patients at completion were 12 mg (SD 6) ropinirole and 24 mg (SD 8) bromocriptine. Occurrence of adverse experiences in both groups was similar. Emergence of dyskinesias was low. Both treatments induced marked improvements in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities of daily living (ADL, Part II) and motor (Part III) scores over the first 12 weeks, which were maintained during the study. After 3 years, patients in the ropinirole group had a mean improvement in motor score of 31% compared with 22% in the bromocriptine group (p = 0.086) and a significantly better ADL score (treatment difference 1.46 points, p = 0.009) [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: Both dopamine agonists are effective in the early treatment of a high proportion of PD patients; effectiveness persists for at least 3 years. Those who completed the study had a significantly better functional status on ropinirole than on bromocriptine.
Three to six years after onset of Guillain-Barré syndrome, 63% of 122 patients showed one or more changes in their lifestyle, work, or leisure activities, or in the life of their partners. The changes were influenced by an impaired final functional outcome, along with loss of power and poor condition, although physically recovered patients showed these changes as well.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.