Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9205282

Isolation techniques.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Bollinger. 1997. Isolation techniques.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9205282/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to reduce nosocomial infections in very low birth weight neonates.

OBJECTIVE: We carried out a randomized placebo-controlled trial in very low birth weight neonates (VLBWNs), comparing the incidence of nosocomial infections after the prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhu GM-CSF) versus placebo in VLBWNs. STUDY DESIGN: VLBWNs (n = 264), weighing 501 to 1000 g, </=72 hours of age were randomly assigned to receive rhu GM-CSF (8 microg/kg/d), administered intravenously (n = 134) over 2 hours daily x 7 days and every other day for 21 days, or placebo (n = 130). The safety, incidence of nosocomial infections, days of absolute neutrophil count >/=4000/mm,3 peripheral blood progenitor studies, and 24-hour polymorphonuclear leukocyte C3bi receptor expression were compared between the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS: No (grade III/IV) toxicity or adverse events were associated with rhu GM-CSF. The absolute neutrophil count and absolute eosinophil count were significantly elevated in the rhu GM-CSF group on days 7 (P =.001), 14 (P =.001), and 21 (P =.007) and on days 7 and 28 (P =.012 and P =.001, respectively). However, there was no difference in the incidence of confirmed nosocomial infections between the 2 treatment groups in this trial (40% vs 39%, rhu GM-CSF vs placebo; P = NS). CONCLUSION: In a large randomized placebo-controlled trial, prophylactic administration of rhu GM-CSF in VLBWNs does not appear to decrease the incidence of nosocomial infections.

Cross Infection

Inactivation of respiratory syncytial virus by generic hand dishwashing detergents and antibacterial hand soaps.

In an in-vitro test, generic liquid hand dishwashing detergents were as much as 100-fold more effective than proprietary antibacterial soaps in inactivating respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The use of such detergents for hand washing during annual RSV epidemics, or the incorporation of their antiviral components into antibacterial soaps might be considered to limit nosocomial spread.

Cross Infection