PubMed · 9147346
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W H Hay. Computer-based diagnostic support systems.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1995.0040256
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Chronic metabolic acidosis in distal renal tubular acidosis (RTA) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of enhanced bone resorption and osteopenia, resulting in a loss of bone mineral content. However, histomorphometric and bone densitometric studies of patients who suffered from long-standing distal RTA have rarely been done. METHODS: A cross-sectional study to determine the alterations of bone mineral density (BMD) and histology was done in 14 nonazotemic RTA patients (11 females and 3 males) who had never received alkaline therapy before enrolling into this study. The mean age was 32.7 +/- 11.9 years. BMD measurements and transiliac bone biopsy were done in all patients. Blood chemistries, intact parathyroid hormone level, and a 24-hour urine collection for the determination of urinary calcium, phosphate, sodium, and potassium were obtained from the RTA patients at the time of bone biopsy. Data from 28 age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched, normal controls who were residents in the same area were also obtained. RESULTS: Urinary excretion of calcium was 2.05 +/- 1.59 mmol/day. No patient had hypercalciuria. The serum intact parathyroid hormone level was 15.92 +/- 8.48 pg/mL. RTA patients had lower BMD in most areas when compared with normal controls. There were two patients who suffered from a pathologic fracture at the femur. Bone histomorphometry from RTA patients shows a significantly decreased bone formation rate (0.02 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.07 +/- 0.045 microm(3)/microm(2)/day, P < 0.05), not significantly decreased osteoblastic surface (0.78 +/- 1.03% vs. 2.6 +/- 1.1%) and osteoclastic surface (0.05 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.23%), but significantly increased osteoid surface (31.47 +/- 24.52 vs. 5.79 +/- 4.39%, P < 0.05) and osteoid volume (2.95 +/- 3.09 vs. 0.92 +/- 1.05%, P < 0.05) when compared with those of normal controls. There was no difference in osteoid thickness (10.65 +/- 6.10 vs. 8.69 +/- 2.14 microm). Only one distal RTA patient who had a marked increase in osteoid thickness justified the diagnosis of osteomalacia. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that low bone mass is common in distal RTA patients. Chronic metabolic acidosis results in suppression of bone formation and resorption, which in turn may contribute to the development of low bone mass in distal RTA patients. Although minor elevations in osteoid surface and osteoid volume are found among distal RTA patients, overt osteomalacia is not the predominant bone lesion.
The primary or hereditary form of distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA), although rare, has received increased attention recently because of dramatic advances in the understanding of its genetic basis. The final regulation of renal acid excretion is effected by various acid/base transporters localized in specialized cells in the cortical collecting and outer medullary collecting tubules. Inherited defects in two of the key acid/base transporters involved in distal acidification, as well as mutations in the cytosolic carbonic anhydrase gene, can cause dRTA. The syndrome is inherited in both autosomal dominant and recessive patterns; patients with recessive dRTA present with either acute illness or growth failure at a young age, sometimes accompanied by deafness, whereas dominant dRTA is usually a milder disease and involves no hearing loss. The AE1 gene encodes two Cl-/HCO3- exchangers that are expressed in the erythrocyte and in the acid-secreting intercalated cells of the kidney. AE1 contributes to urinary acidification by providing the major exit route for HCO3- across the basolateral membrane. Several mutations in the AE1 gene cosegregate with dominant dRTA. The modest degree of hypofunction exhibited in vitro by these mutations, however, does not explain the abnormal distal acidification phenotype. Other AE1 mutations have been linked to a recessive syndrome of dRTA and hemolytic anemia in which hypofunction can be discerned by in vitro studies. Several mutations in the carbonic anyhdrase II gene are associated with the autosomal recessive syndrome of osteopetrosis, renal tubular acidosis, and cerebral calcification. Some of these individuals present with deafness of the conductive type. By contrast, more recent studies have shown that mutations in ATP6B1, encoding the B-subtype unit of the apical H(+) ATPase, are responsible for a group of patients with autosomal recessive dRTA associated with sensorineural deafness. Thus, the presence of deafness and the type provide an important clue to the genetic lesion underlying hereditary dRTA.