Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9136981

Limiting dilution assay: single or multiple dilution protocol?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L K Nielsen. 1997. Limiting dilution assay: single or multiple dilution protocol?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9136981/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

QSPR analysis for infinite dilution activity coefficients of organic compounds.

A quantitative structure-property relationship study of the infinite-dilution activity coefficients for a set of 38 organic compounds in ionic liquids such as 1-methyl-3-ethylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)imide, 1,2-dimethyl-3-ethylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl)-sulfonyl)imide, and 4-methyl-N-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate. QSPR study was carried out using the CODESSA PRO program. A general three-parameter QSPR model was obtained. Three orthogonal theoretical molecular descriptors satisfactorily correlate with the activity coefficients. The descriptors, such as the complementary information content, the fractional partial negative surface area and the count of hydrogen donor sites describe the dilution process in ILs.

Indicator Dilution Techniques↗

[Precision of drug dilution techniques].

OBJECT: Evaluation of accuracy of three common dilution methods for drugs. EXPERIMENTAL PLAN: Perspective double blind investigation from March to June 1995. PLACE: Anaesthesia and Resuscitation Service of Children's Hospital of Iglesias (CA). METHODS: Forty dopamine at 2/1000 samples, obtained by dilution of dopamine at 40/1000 on sale with three different methods by five different operators, were analysed with a chromatography system in liquid phase at high pressure. RESULTS: Mean concentration with difference not exceeding 5% from the goal, are considered acceptable. Only one group of samples was found to be into these limits, but it was also the most dangerous for the high percentage of great mistakes in dilution. Although there are significant differences in the accuracy and safety of the three dilution methods, the highest and lowest final concentrations obtained differ very much from those estimated. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that drugs confections with proper dilution for different clinical uses might be on sale.

Indicator Dilution Techniques↗