Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8973956

A quantitative method for comparing and evaluating manual prosthetic socket modifications.

E D Lemaire·F Johnson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Manually designed prosthetic sockets are difficult to evaluate since the hand-sculpting modification process does not retain the initial shape for comparison. A quantitative method for defining and comparing manual socket modifications was developed and integrated into the CADVIEW software package. The numerical comparison procedure consisted of a) digitizing premodification and post-modification models of a prosthetic socket, b) aligning these two shapes to a common axis (calculate cross section centroids, determine line of best fit through the centroids, rotate and move the line of best fit to a common axis), and c) displaying the differences in shape both numerically and using a color-coded three dimensional image. Alignment technique testing showed a between-radial-point average error of 2.5 mm using automatic alignment and 1.4 mm after further manual alignment adjustment. The between socket difference values were used to outline individual modifications and save these outlines to disk. Modification outlines from a series of patients were averaged to determine a prosthetist's general modification style. Averaged results from two prosthetists qualitatively supported the effectiveness of this procedure. This alignment and comparison system should help transfer hand-sculpting skills to prosthetic CAD/CAM systems, clinical research, and education for new clinicians.

Explore related subjects

Amputation StumpsArtificial LimbsComputer-Aided DesignEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansLegModels, TheoreticalProsthesis DesignProsthesis FittingReference ValuesSensitivity and SpecificitySoftwareComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E D Lemaire, F Johnson. 1996. A quantitative method for comparing and evaluating manual prosthetic socket modifications.. https://doi.org/10.1109/86.547931

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

A rate-controlled indentor for in vivo analysis of residual limb tissues.

A tissue tester was designed to enable rate-controlled indentation of the bulk soft tissues of lower extremity residual limbs. The tissue tester employs a digital linear actuator that implements rate-controlled indentation, and a load cell that measures the reaction force resulting from tissue indentation. Viscoelastic phenomena such as preconditioning, hysteresis and force relaxation can be assessed, and the effect of varying indentation rates on soft tissue stiffness can be investigated. The device accommodates indentor excursions up to 30 mm, indentation at rates of 0 to 10 mm/s, reaction forces up to 44 N, and multiple loading/unloading cycles. The tissue tester is controlled via a notebook personal computer with a PCMCIA data acquisition card. The tissue testing trials are automated and the entire test system is portable and amenable for use in a clinical or research environment. System output consists of force-displacement curves from cyclic loading, and force-time curves following ramped-step indentation. The mean indentor positioning error was 0.071 (+/-0.75)% of the desired displacement. This error varied as a function of indentation and was approximately independent of the indentation rate. Indentation rates were accurate to within 0.94(+/-0.68)% of the desired value and also varied with indentation. Indentation of a viscoelastic foam yielded force-displacement curves that were consistent with that obtained from an Instron universal testing machine.

Amputation Stumps↗
PubMed1998

Optimal treatment of phantom limb pain in the elderly.

Phantom limb and stump pain is a common sequela of amputation. In geriatric patients with an amputated limb and multiple other illnesses, drug therapy may be problematic and invasive techniques may be risky. Interactions between pathophysiological mechanisms in the peripheral and central nervous systems may be responsible for the initiation and maintenance of chronic phantom limb and stump pain. These mechanisms include: (i) peripheral damage to nociceptive fibres and dorsal root ganglion cells, which acquire abnormal sensitivity to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimuli; (ii) the prolonged sensitisation of central nociceptive 'second order' neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, which become hyperexcitable and start responding to nonnoxious stimuli; and (iii) the degeneration of nociceptive neurons, which may trigger the anatomical sprouting of low threshold mechanosensitive terminals to form connections with central nociceptive neurons. This may subsequently induce functional synaptic reorganisation in the dorsal horn. The provision of a pain-free perioperative interval using regional anaesthetic techniques is likely to reduce the incidence of phantom limb pain. The therapy of manifest pain is difficult, and treatment should start as soon as possible to prevent chronic pain. In the acute state, the infusion of calcitonin and oral opioid analgesics have proven to be helpful, while established phantom limb pain may respond to antidepressants, anticonvulsants and drugs that mimic or enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid function. Pharmacological treatment should be combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, sympathetic blockade and psychotherapy. In addition, new therapeutic strategies are now being tested; examples include capsaicin, new anticonvulsants and N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists. Patients with severe pain should be referred to a pain specialist to ensure optimal and timely interventional pain management.

Amputation Stumps↗