Correct reference on SUPPORT study provided.

BACKGROUND: Rapid time to treatment with thrombolytic therapy is an important determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that establishment of an AMI thrombolysis critical pathway in the Emergency Department could successfully reduce the "door-to-drug" time, the time between patient arrival and start of thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Before establishment of the AMI critical pathway, median door-to-drug time was 73 min, which was reduced to 37 min after critical pathway implementation (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients treated within 30 min rose from 0% prior to establishment of the pathway to 43% (p = 0.03). Similarly, the percentage treated in within 45 min rose from 0 to 67% (p = 0.0005). Door-to-drug times were longer for women than for men (median 105 min for women vs. 70 min for men before pathway implementation). The pathway reduced door-to-drug time for both genders, but the median door-to-drug times were higher for women than for men (Mann-Whitney p = 0.013). The difference between men and women was 35 min before establishment of the pathway to 10 min by the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our critical pathway was successful in reducing door-to-drug times. We observed a "gender gap" in door-to-drug times, with longer mean times for women, which was reduced by the AMI critical pathway. Thus, our data provide support for the use of critical pathways to reduce door-to-drug times, as recommended by the National Heart Attack Alert Program.

Critical Care↗

PubMed1998

Total parenteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Nutritional support has become a standard of care for hospitalized patients, but whether total parenteral nutrition (TPN) affects morbidity and mortality is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between TPN and complication and mortality rates in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: Computerized search of published research on MEDLINE from 1980 to 1998, personal files, and review of relevant reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed 210 titles, abstracts, and papers. Primary studies were included if they were randomized clinical trials of critically ill or surgical patients that evaluated the effect of TPN (compared with standard care) on complication and mortality rates. We excluded studies comparing TPN with enteral nutrition. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were abstracted on the methodology and outcomes of primary studies. Data were abstracted in duplicate, independently. DATA SYNTHESIS: There were 26 randomized trials of 2211 patients comparing the use of TPN with standard care (usual oral diet plus intravenous dextrose) in surgical and critically ill patients. When the results of these trials were aggregated, TPN had no effect on mortality (risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.31). Patients who received TPN tended to have a lower complication rate, but this result was not statistically significant (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.09). We examined several a priori hypotheses and found that studies including only malnourished patients were associated with lower complication rates but no difference in mortality when compared with studies of nonmalnourished patients. Studies published since 1989 and studies with a higher methods score showed no treatment effect, while studies published in 1988 or before and studies with a lower methods score demonstrated a significant treatment effect. Complication rates were lower in studies that did not use lipids; however, there was no difference in mortality rates between studies that did not use lipids and those studies that did. Studies limited to critically ill patients demonstrated a significant increase in complication and mortality rates compared with studies of surgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Total parenteral nutrition does not influence the overall mortality rate of surgical or critically ill patients. It may reduce the complication rate, especially in malnourished patients, but study results are influenced by patient population, use of lipids, methodological quality, and year of publication.

Critical Care↗