Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8938006

Shadows and depth illusions.

Abstract

The visual system uses shadows to compute perceived depth of features on an uneven surface, and in doing so makes the assumption of a single light source in most circumstances. Three illusory depth effects are described (depth reversal, accentuation, and flattening) that can be demonstrated with 3-D materials, and all of which are based on the single-source assumption. Ambiguous lighting conditions may produce moment-to-moment depth reversals and/or the subjective sensation of textural 'strangeness'. It is suggested that these are both subjective experiences which occur when the system cannot compute depth with certainty.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R C Morris. 1996. Shadows and depth illusions.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p250927

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.

In a recall-based spoken production experiment, native English-speaking participants' variable use of the complementiser that to introduce the sentential complement in sentences like Henry knew (that) Lucy/Louise washed the dishes was found to be related to whether that inclusion/omission resulted in an alternating sequence of stressed and unstressed syllables between the verb of the main clause and the subject of the complement clause. This finding is discussed in relation to the question of whether and how phonological encoding can influence grammatical encoding in spoken language production.

Cues↗

Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.

Repeated statements receive higher truth ratings than new statements. Given that repetition leads to greater experienced processing fluency, the author proposes that fluency is used in truth judgments according to its ecological validity. Thus, the truth effect occurs because people learn that fluency and truth tend to be positively correlated. Three experiments tested this notion. Experiment 1 replicated the truth effect by directly manipulating processing fluency; Experiment 2 reversed the effect by manipulating the correlation between fluency and truth in a learning phase. Experiment 3 generalized this reversal by showing a transfer of a negative correlation between perceptual fluency (due to color contrast) and truth to truth judgments when fluency is due to prior exposure (i.e., repetition).

Cues↗