PubMed · 872616
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L E Spitler. 1977. Levamisole.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/872616/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.
BACKGROUND: Topotecan [(S)-9-dimethylaminomethyl(10-hydroxy-camptothecin), NSC 609699, SK&F 104864A], a semisynthetic analogue of the natural product camptothecin, is a cell cycle-specific drug that exerts antineoplastic activity through inhibition of topoisomerase I. Currently, topotecan is undergoing phase I and early phase II clinical trials. The dose-limiting toxicity for topotecan is myelosuppression. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine plasma concentrations and exposure times necessary for optimal clinical activity and tumor types that may be responsive in phase II clinical studies of topotecan. METHODS: A soft-agar cloning system assay was used to determine the in vitro effects of topotecan against cells from biopsy specimens of colorectal, breast, lung, ovarian, renal cell, and gastric cancers and cancers of unknown primary origin. We studied 141 freshly explanted tumor specimens, using 1-hour exposure to topotecan, and 80 were studied using continuous exposure. A decrease in tumor colony formation resulting from drug exposure was considered an in vitro response if survival of colonies was up to 50% of that in controls. RESULTS: With 1-hour exposure, in vitro responses were seen in 10% and 25% of assessable tumor specimens at final topotecan concentrations of 1.0 and 10.0 micrograms/mL, respectively. With continuous exposures at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 micrograms/mL, in vitro response rates were 34% and 76%, respectively. Specific activity was seen against colorectal, breast, non-small-cell lung, ovarian, and renal cell cancers, with responses observed in 27%, 25%, 32%, 39%, and 83%, respectively, of assessable tumor specimens after continuous exposure to 0.1 micrograms/mL topotecan. A subset of tumor specimens resistant to doxorubicin or fluorouracil was sensitive to topotecan, and the difference in sensitivity was statistically significant. In addition, some of the tumor specimens resistant to cyclophosphamide and etoposide were also sensitive to topotecan. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan appears to be active in vitro against a variety of human tumors, including a subgroup resistant in vitro to standard antineoplastic agents. If plasma levels of 0.1 micrograms/mL can be achieved for prolonged periods of time in ongoing clinical trials, topotecan should have substantial clinical activity. IMPLICATIONS: Further clinical development of topotecan is warranted.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to economically evaluate the prophylactic use of the recombinant factor of the stimulation of granulocyte colonies (rG-CSF) for the prevention of episodes of febrile neutropenia (EFN) following antineoplasic chemotherapy. METHODS: The methods of economic evaluation used were those of cost analysis and cost-effectivity analysis. The probability of occurence of EFN was estimated by the application of the Delphi method and the costs were calculated. RESULTS: The costs of EFN for the patients with solid tumors is situated between 236,000-377,000 pesetas according to hospitalary centers. For patients with acute leukemia the value was estimated as between 391,000-667,000 pesetas. The results of the cost analysis indicate that the net cost per patient prophylactically treated is between 4,000-64,000 pesetas. The results of the cost-effectivity analysis indicate that the cost per case of no incidence of EFN is between 20,000-320,000 pesetas. CONCLUSIONS: Episodes of febrile neutropenia carry expansive hospital and antibiotic clinical treatment. The prophylactic use of new medication for patients between the first and second cycle of chemotherapy, in agreement with the estimates calculated, does not save health care costs but may improve the quality of life in these patients and permit the continuation of a therapeutic schedule without interruption which may improve the life expectancy of the patient.