Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Levamisole”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of levamisole alone, levamisole plus ivermectin, and levamisole plus albendazole, and their efficacy against Onchocerca volvulus.

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, in which levamisole (2.5 mg/kg) was given alone or co-administered with ivermectin (200 microg/kg) or albendazole (400 mg), were conducted. In Trial 1, safety and drug-drug interaction were explored in 42 healthy male volunteers. During Trial 2, the safety of the same treatment regimens and their efficacy against the adult worms and microfilariae of Onchocerca volvulus were investigated in 66 infected subjects of both sexes. Safety was determined from the results of detailed clinical and laboratory examinations before treatment, during hospitalization and on day 30. The pharmacokinetic parameters for levamisole alone and the combinations were determined in Trial 1 and then compared with historical data for ivermectin and albendazole, given as single agents, to determine if drug-drug interaction had occurred. The level of efficacy against the adult worms was determined by the examination of histology sections of nodules excised 6 months posttreatment and from the changes seen in the levels of microfilaridermia within a year of treatment. Microfilaricidal efficacy was estimated from the reductions in the levels of microfilaridermia between day 0 (1 day pre-treatment) and day 30. Although the regimens were generally well tolerated, there were unexpected adverse effects in both healthy volunteers and infected subjects. Clinically significant drug-drug interactions resulted in an increase in the bio-availability of ivermectin but a reduction in that of albendazole when these drugs were co-administered with levamisole. Levamisole given alone or with albendazole had little effect on O. volvulus. The combination of levamisole with ivermectin was neither macrofilaricidal nor more effective against the microfilariae and the adult worms than ivermectin alone. The pathogenesis of the adverse events and the drug-drug interactions are discussed.

Adolescent↗

Immunomodulatory action of levamisole--II. Enhancement of concanavalin A response by levamisole is associated with an oxidation degradation product of levamisole formed during lymphocyte culture.

Previously we determined that levamisole (LMS), when stored for a period of time, breaks down to three degradation products at neutral and alkaline pH. At low concentrations (10(-6) M), Product 1 inhibits the lymphocyte response to concanavalin A (Con A). Product 2 enhances the response and Product 3 has no effect. At higher concentrations (10(-5) M) all three products inhibit the response. To determine if these products are formed in culture media under culture conditions (e.g. in RPMI-1640 bicarbonate buffered medium, 37 degrees C, pH 7.0-7.5, during a 72 h culture period), we added freshly prepared LMS solutions to culture media with and without lymphocytes present and maintained the pH at 7.0, 7.25 or 7.5 by varying the amount of CO2 present. Periodically over a 72 h period, aliquots of the media were removed and analyzed for the presence of LMS and the three degradation products. Within 4 h, two of the degradation product began to form in culture media with or without lymphocytes present. Product No. 1, 3-(2-mercaptoethyl)-5-phenylimidazolidine-2-one or dl-2-oxy-3-(2-mercaptoethyl)-5-phenylimidazolidine (OMPI), which inhibits the lymphocyte response to concanavalin A (Con A) at concentrations above 0.4 micrograms/ml, was formed at pH 7.0, 7.25 and 7.5, but the compound did not reach inhibitory concentrations in the lymphocyte cultures during the 72 h culture period. Product No. 2, 6-phenyl-2,3-dihydroimidazo (2,1-b) thiazole, which enhances the Con A response between concentrations of 0.5 and 10 micrograms/ml, was detected at concentrations between 2.5 and 3.5 micrograms/ml at pH 7.25 and 7.5. Product 2 was not detected in cultures at pH 7.0 and subsequently when we cultured lymphocytes with freshly prepared LMS and maintained the pH at 7.0, no significant enhancement of the Con A response was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Methyridine (2-[2-methoxyethyl]-pyridine]) and levamisole activate different ACh receptor subtypes in nematode parasites: a new lead for levamisole-resistance.

1. The development of resistance to all chemotherapeutic agents increases and needs to be addressed. We are interested in resistance in parasitic nematodes to the anthelmintic levamisole. During studies on methyridine, we found that it gave us a new insight into pharmacological changes associated with levamisole resistance. Initially, electrophysiological investigation using a two-micropipette current-clamp recording technique revealed that methyridine acts as a cholinergic agonist on nematode muscle receptors (Ascaris suum). Methyridine (>30 microm) produced reversible concentration-dependent depolarizations and increases in input conductance. Mecamylamine (30 microm) and paraherquamide (0.3 microm) produced reversible antagonism of the depolarization and conductance responses to methyridine. These observations suggest that methyridine, like acetylcholine and levamisole, gates ion channels on the muscle of parasitic nematodes. 2. The antagonistic effects of dihydro-beta-erythroidine and paraherquamide on methyridine-induced contractions of A. suum muscle flaps were then examined to determine if methyridine showed subtype selectivity for N-subtype (nicotine-sensitive) or L-subtype (levamisole-sensitive) acetylcholine receptors. Dihydro-beta-erythroidine weakly antagonized the effects of methyridine (but had no effect on levamisole responses). The antagonism of methyridine (pA2, 5.9) and nicotine (pA2, 6.1) by paraherquamide was similar, but was less than the antagonism of levamisole (pA2, 7.0). The antagonist profiles suggested that methyridine has a selective action on the N-subtype rather than on the L-subtype. 3. A novel use for a larval inhibition migration assay was made using L3 larvae of Oesophagostomum dentatum. Inhibitory effects of nicotine, levamisole, pyrantel and methyridine on the migration of larvae of levamisole-sensitive (SENS) and levamisole-resistant (LEV-R) isolates were tested at different concentrations. Levamisole and pyrantel (putative L-subtype-selective agonists) concentration-response plots were displaced to the right in LEV-R isolates. Nicotine (an N-subtype-selective agonist) and methyridine produced little shift in concentration-response plots in the LEV-R isolates. Resistance dose ratios were used to calculate the relative selectivity, rhoL, for the L-type receptor (levamisole rhoL=1.0; pyrantel rhoL=0.93; methyridine rhoL=0.17; nicotine rhoL=0.06). These observations reveal an N-subtype-selective action of methyridine and suggest that levamisole resistance may be associated with a loss of the L-subtype, but not the N-subtype receptors. The pharmacology of methyridine suggests an approach for the treatment of levamisole-resistant parasites.

Animals↗

Levamisole receptor phosphorylation: effects of kinase antagonists on membrane potential responses in Ascaris suum suggest that CaM kinase and tyrosine kinase regulate sensitivity to levamisole.

A two-micropipette current-clamp technique was used to record electrophysiological responses from the somatic muscle of Ascaris suum. Levamisole and acetylcholine were applied to the bag region of the muscle using a microperfusion system. Depolarizations produced by 10 s applications of 10 micro mol l(-1) levamisole or 20 s applications of 10 micro mol l(-1) acetylcholine were recorded. The effect on the peak membrane potential change of the kinase antagonists H-7, staurosporine, KN-93 and genistein was observed. H-7 (30 micro mol l(-1)), a non-selective antagonist of protein kinases A, C and G but which has little effect on Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaM kinase II), did not produce a significant effect on the peak response to levamisole or acetylcholine. Staurosporine (1 micro mol l(-1)), a non-selective kinase antagonist that has effects on protein kinases A, C and G, CaM kinase and tyrosine kinase, reduced the mean peak membrane potential response to levamisole from 6.8 mV to 3.9 mV (P<0.0001) and the mean response to acetylcholine from 5.5 mV to 2.8 mV (P=0.0016). The difference between the effects of H-7 and staurosporine suggested the involvement of CaM kinase II and/or tyrosine kinase. KN-93, a selective CaM kinase II antagonist, reduced the mean peak response to levamisole from 6.2 mV to 2.7 mV (P=0.035) and the mean peak response of acetylcholine from 4.7 mV to 2.0 mV (P=0.0004). The effects indicated the involvement of CaM kinase II in the phosphorylation of levamisole and acetylcholine receptors. The effect of extracellular Ca(2+) on the response to levamisole was assessed by comparing responses to levamisole in normal and in low-Ca(2+) bathing solutions. The response to levamisole was greater in the presence of Ca(2+), an effect that may be explained by stimulation of CaM kinase II. Genistein (90 micro mol l(-1)), a selective tyrosine kinase antagonist, reduced peak membrane potential responses to levamisole from a mean of 6.4 mV to 3.3 mV (P=0.001). This effect indicated the involvement of tyrosine kinase in maintaining the receptor.

1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-Methylpiperazine↗

[Effect of levamisole in postoperative adjuvant immunochemotherapy of stomach cancer--randomized controlled study of MMC-tegafur combination therapy with or without levamisole. 1].

The effects of levamisole used in combination with Mitomycin C and Tegafur in patients with resectable stomach cancer were investigated in 10 cooperative institutes. The patients were randomly allocated to the treatment with either control or levamisole by envelope method. Levamisole group was treated with Mitomycin C (day 0, 20 mg, day 1, 10 mg, one shot i.v.), Tegafur (600 mg/day, p.o.) and levamisole (150 mg/day, p.o.). Levamisole was administered 3 consecutive days prior to surgery, and 3 consecutive days every fortnight after surgery. The control group was administered Mitomycin C and Tegafur. The both drugs were administered by the same method as above. Two hundred and twenty-two patients were entered in this trial. However, with the exclusion of 67 patients, the eligible patients were 155, consisting of 77 in the control group and 78 in the levamisole group. In stage III patients, the disease-free interval and survival time were significantly prolonged in the levamisole group compared to the control group (generalized Wilcoxon test p less than 0.05). The side effects were observed a little more frequently in the levamisole group. However, there was no significant difference. From this result, it can be considered that levamisole is effective in delaying recurrence and in prolonging survival time of the patients when used in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of stomach cancer.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Levamisole in rheumatoid arthritis. Final report on a randomised double-blind study comparing a single weekly dose of levamisole with placebo. Multicentre Study Group.

The therapeutic effect of a single weekly dose of levamisole in patients with rheumatoid arthritis was compared with placebo for 6 months in a 13-centre double-blind controlled study. 281 patients with classic or definite rheumatoid arthritis and active disease were evaluated. A single weekly dose of 150 mg levamisole was superior to placebo in controlling disease activity. A single weekly dose of 50 mg levamisole had an intermediate effect. Adverse reactions occurred in approximately 40% of the patients with 150 mg levamisole and in approximately 20% of the patients with 50 mg levamisole or placebo. In comparison with the classical dosage schedule of levamisole (150 mg on 3 consecutive days each week) a single weekly dose of 150 mg levamisole was found to be slightly less effective but much better tolerated.

Adult↗

Surgical adjuvant therapy of large-bowel carcinoma: an evaluation of levamisole and the combination of levamisole and fluorouracil. The North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic.

A total of 401 eligible patients with resected stages B and C colorectal carcinoma were randomly assigned to no-further therapy or to adjuvant treatment with either levamisole alone, 150 mg/d for 3 days every 2 weeks for 1 year, or levamisole plus fluorouracil (5-FU), 450 mg/m2/d intravenously (IV) for 5 days and beginning at 28 days, 450 mg/m2 weekly for 1 year. Levamisole plus 5-FU, and to a lesser extent levamisole alone, reduced cancer recurrence in comparison with no adjuvant therapy. These differences, after correction for imbalances in prognostic variables, were only suggestive for levamisole alone (P = .05) but quite significant for levamisole plus 5-FU (P = .003). Whereas both treatment regimens were associated with overall improvements in survival, these improvements reached borderline significance only for stage C patients treated with levamisole plus 5-FU (P = .03). Therapy was clinically tolerable with either regimen and severe toxicity was uncommon. These promising results have led to a large national intergroup confirmatory trial currently in progress.

Adult↗

[Effect of levamisole in postoperative adjuvant immunochemotherapy of stomach cancer--randomized controlled study of MMC-5-FU combination therapy with or without levamisole. 1].

A randomized controlled study by envelope method was carried out with the purpose of evaluating effects and side effects of levamisole in patients with resectable stomach cancer. The patients were randomly allocated to the treatment either with control or levamisole according to the indication of the envelope opened at least 3 days prior to surgery. The control group was treated with Mitomycin C (day 0, 20 mg day 1, 10 mg, one shot i.v.) and 5-FU(150 mg/day, p.o.). The levamisole group was treated with Mitomycin C, 5-FU and levamisole. Levamisole was administered at a daily dose of 150 mg for 3 consecutive days before surgery, and the 3 consecutive days administration schedule was repeated every fortnight for one year after surgery. Four hundred and forty-six patients were entered in this trial. However, with the exclusion of 104 patients as exceptions and dropouts, the total eligible patients were 342, consisting of 167 in the control group and 175 in the levamisole group. The effects were evaluated by comparing the disease-free interval or the survival time of both groups. There was no significant difference in the disease-free interval and survival. In this study, we have not yet reached the conclusion that levamisole is effective in prolonging disease-free interval and survival time, because high survival rates are still maintained in both groups for 2 years after surgery. The final conclusion would be drawn with the follow-up results in the future.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Resistance to levamisole and cross-resistance between pyrantel and levamisole in Oesophagostomum quadrispinulatum and Oesophagostomum dentatum of pigs.

Two strains of Oesophagostomum spp., consisting of both O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum, were subjected to a controlled in vivo assay for resistance to levamisole and pyrantel by comparison with susceptible isolates. One strain (LEM) was recently isolated from a commercial herd, where sows showed high numbers of strongyle eggs in faeces within 2 weeks of farrowing and following treatment with levamisole at the manufacturer's recommended dose rate 1 week before farrowing. Levamisole had been used as the sole anthelmintic for treatment for at least 7 years on this farm. Treatment with pyrantel in this herd also indicated cross-resistance to this drug. A mixed population of O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum of this strain was subjected to controlled in vivo assays. Faecal egg count reduction (FECR) was found to be -573.3% (P greater than 0.05) and worm count reductions (WCR) of O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum were estimated as 44.5% (P greater than 0.05) and 96.4% (P less than 0.001), respectively. Treatment with pyrantel showed that cross-resistance existed to this drug, with FECR of 10.4% (P greater than 0.05) and WCR of 64.5% (P greater than 0.05) and 90.7% (P less than 0.05) for O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum, respectively. Another strain (VJ) was isolated from another commercial pig herd, which was dosed with pyrantel citrate four times a year for at least 8 years. This strain showed resistance to pyrantel, with FECR of 43.8% (P greater than 0.05) and WCR of 65.9% (P greater than 0.05) and 49.4% (P greater than 0.05) for O. quadrispinulatum and O. dentatum, respectively. However, both species were susceptible to levamisole. Our results suggested that selection with levamisole gave rise to levamisole resistance and automatically conferred resistance to pyrantel, whereas selection with pyrantel only resulted in resistance to this drug alone. These findings are discussed in relation to the location of the two species of Oesophagostomum in the large intestine of pigs and the mode of action of this class of anthelmintics.

Animals↗

Chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone alone or with levamisole or with levamisole plus BCG for malignant lymphoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

Between 1977 and 1983 the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) evaluated chemotherapy alone (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; CHOP) or chemoimmunotherapy (CHOP-levamisole or CHOP-levamisole-BCG) in a randomized prospective clinical trial involving 715 eligible patients with all types of malignant lymphoma (ML). Of 281 evaluable patients with favorable histologic types of ML, 171 (61%) achieved complete remission (CR) and there was no difference in CR rate, CR duration, or survival according to the type of initial treatment. Of 388 evaluable patients with unfavorable histologic types of ML, 194 (50%) achieved CR. Levamisole appeared to adversely affect CR rates in nodular mixed and nodular large-cell lymphoma and CR duration in patients with unfavorable histology ML. Chemoimmunotherapy with levamisole or levamisole-BCG offers no advantage in terms of CR rates, CR duration, or survival compared to CHOP chemotherapy alone, and levamisole may have had an adverse impact on outcome in certain subtypes of ML.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Effects of dexamethasone, levamisole, and dexamethasone-levamisole combination on neutrophil function in female goats.

Effects of dexamethasone, levamisole, or combined dexamethasone-levamisole administration on polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) function in healthy, adult female goats were studied. Goats were assigned to treated (n = 6) and control (n = 6) groups. In experiment 1, treated goats were given levamisole (6 mg/kg of body weight, IM). In experiment 2, treated goats were given 0.1 mg of dexamethasone/kg, IV, for 3 consecutive days, 1 mg of dexamethasone/kg, IV, for 6 consecutive days, and 6 mg of levamisole/kg, IM, with a 4th injection of 1 mg of dexamethasone/kg. All injections were administered 12 hours before blood collection. The PMN were evaluated for random migration and chemotaxis under agarose, ingestion of Staphylococcus aureus, cytochrome C reduction, iodination, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Levamisole alone did not alter the function of caprine PMN. Both doses of dexamethasone caused increased random migration and decreased cytochrome C reduction and iodination. Dexamethasone resulted in no changes in chemotaxis, S aureus ingestion, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Random migration and cytochrome C reduction returned toward base line in cells from dexamethasone and levamisole-treated goats. Although iodination activity in cells from dexamethasone-treated goats remained significantly (P less than 0.05) lower than those of controls after levamisole administration, a rebound toward base-line activity occurred.

Animals↗

In vitro stimulation of neutrophil motility by levamisole: maintenance of cgmp levels in chemotactically stimulated levamisole-treated neutrophils.

Levamisole at concentrations of 10(-3) M or 10(-4) M consistently increased neutrophil random motility and chemokinesis (stimulated random migration). Similar concentrations also increased directional movement of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to both endotoxin-activated serum and hydrolyzed casein. This effect on chemotaxis was due to a true stimulation and was not due solely to increased random movement. The effect of levamisole on the neutrophils could be removed by washing, but persisted if the cells were initially treated with levamisole and serum or endotoxin-activated serum. After neutrophil stimulation with chemotactic factor an initial rise in intracellular cyclic AMP levels was detected which was not influenced by prior levamisole treatment. Intracellular cyclic GMP levels after an initial slight depression, returned to resting levels and gradually diminished over a 60-minute period. Levamisole-treated cells consistently showed higher cyclic GMP levels and it is postulated that by maintaining intracellular cyclic GMP levels, microtubular assembly and cell motility might be enhanced.

Caseins↗

Efficacy of levamisole pour-on compared with levamisole subcutaneous injection against Dictyocaulus viviparus infection in calves.

The efficacy of levamisole pour-on against Dictyocaulus viviparus was compared to that of subcutaneous levamisole injection. Eighteen calves were raised individually and artifically infected with D. viviparus larvae. Faecal samples were collected 27 and 28 days later and larvae per gram (l.p.g.) determined. The animals were then divided into three comparable groups. Group 1 animals remained untreated as controls. Group 2 animals received levamisole 10% w/v subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 mg kg-1 and Group 3 received levamisole pour-on 20% w/v at a rate of 10 mg kg-1 applied transdermally. Results of l.p.g. measurements from faecal samples taken 7 and 8 days post-treatment indicated a dramatic reduction in the worm burden of animals in both treatment groups. Necropsies at 14 days post-treatment revealed few adult worms in these groups, indicating a 99 and 98% kill rate for pouron and subcutaneous injection, respectively.

Administration, Topical↗

The efficacy of levamisole, and a mixture of oxfendazole and levamisole, against the arrested stages of benzimidazole-resistant Haemonchus contortus and Ostertagia circumcincta in sheep.

Sheep were allowed to graze pasture that had been seeded with benzimidazole-resistant Haemonchus contortus and Ostertagia circumcincta in order to acquire a burden of arrested larvae. Following housing, sheep were dosed orally with either oxfendazole at a dose rate of 4.7 mg/kg (to confirm the benzimidazole-resistant status of the species of nematode), levamisole at a dose rate of 7.5 mg/kg, or an oxfendazole/levamisole mixture at a dose rate of 4.6 mg/kg oxfendazole and 8.1 mg/kg levamisole. The efficacies of the treatments were assessed by estimation of the arrested larval burden in the abomasum of each sheep, either at 10 or 11 days (oxfendazole and oxfendazole/levamisole mixture), or 12 or 13 days (levamisole), after treatment. Compared to the untreated controls, the protection afforded by a single dose of either levamisole or the oxfendazole/levamisole mixture was >99% against the arrested stages of both Haemonchus contortus and Ostertagia circumcincta. Treatment with oxfendazole confirmed the benzimidazole-resistance status of the two species.

Abomasum↗

Levamisole in rheumatoid arthritis. A randomised double-blind study comparing two dosage regimens of levamisole with placebo. Multicentre study group.

The therapeutic effect of levamisole in patients with rheumatoid arthritis was evaluated in a sixteen-centre double-blind controlled study which compared continuous and intermittent levamisole treatment with placebo for six months. 363 patients with classic or definite rheumatoid arthritis and active disease were evaluated. Continuous and intermittent levamisole treatments were equally effective in controlling disease activity. 20% of patients had important drug-related adverse reactions. The results demonstrated that levamisole is an active drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Administration, Oral↗

The effectiveness of benzimidazole-levamisole combination drenches in the presence of resistance to both benzimidazole and levamisole anthelmintics in New Zealand sheep.

Examination of 25 cases of multiple benzimidazole and levamisole resistance, identified in sheep by faecal egg count reduction testing at the Batchelar, Lincoln and Invermay Animal Health Laboratories, showed that benzimidazole-levamisole combinations provided effective control in eight (47%) of 17 cases in which they were tested. Overall, the use of combination drenches resulted in average improvements in faecal egg count reductions of 25.6% (p<0.01) and 23.2% (p<0.05), respectively, over those achieved by the use of benzimidazole or levamisole drenches alone. The results suggest that instances of multiple resistance in which combination drenches might be effective are unlikely to be predictable either by identification of the parasites involved, or from the levels of benzimidazole or levamisole resistance present.

Journal Article↗

Phase III Southwest Oncology Group 9415/Intergroup 0153 randomized trial of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole versus fluorouracil continuous infusion and levamisole for adjuvant treatment of stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer.

PURPOSE: Modest toxicity and possibly enhanced activity makes continuous-infusion fluorouracil (FU) an attractive alternative to FU plus leucovorin (FU/LV) for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. Intergroup trial 0153 (Southwest Oncology Group trial 9415) was developed to compare the efficacy of continuous-infusion FU (CIFU) plus levamisole to FU/LV plus levamisole in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk Dukes' B2 and C1 or C2 colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to CIFU 250 mg/m(2)/d for 56 days every 9 weeks for three cycles or FU 425 mg/m(2) and LV 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days every 28 to 35 days for six cycles. All patients received levamisole 50 mg tid for 3 days every other week. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study closed in December 1999 after an interim analysis demonstrated little likelihood of CIFU showing superiority to FU/LV within the stipulated hazard ratio. A total of 1,135 patients were registered. At least one grade 4 toxicity occurred in 39% of patients receiving FU/LV and 5% of patients receiving CIFU. However, almost twice as many patients receiving CIFU discontinued therapy early compared with those receiving FU/LV. The 5-year OS is 70% (95% CI, 66% to 74%) for FU/LV and 69% (95% CI, 64% to 73%) for CIFU. The corresponding 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) is 61% (95% CI, 56% to 65%) and 63% (95% CI, 59% to 68%), respectively. For all patients, 5-year OS is 83%, 74%, and 55%; 5-year DFS is 78%, 67%, and 47% for N0, N1, and N2-3, respectively. CONCLUSION: CIFU had less severe toxicity but did not improve DFS or OS in comparison with bolus FU/LV.

Adult↗

Cholinesterase and phosphatase activities in adults and infective-stage larvae of levamisole-resistant and levamisole-susceptible isolates of Haemonchus contortus.

Cholinesterase (ChE) and acid phosphatase (AP) activities, but not alkaline phosphatase activities, were detected in cytosolic and membrane-bound fractions of adult and infective-stage larvae of levamisole-resistant and levamisole-susceptible Haemonchus contortus. In contrast to other gastrointestinal nematodes, the ChE activity was higher in L3 than in adults and, in both cases, was mainly associated with membranes. ChE activity was inhibited by Triton X-100 and was only detected in membrane-bound fractions when the detergent was removed. Differences between resistant and susceptible L3 were observed in the response to inhibitors (cytosolic fraction) and in the enzymatic content (membrane-bound fraction). Phosphatase activity was detected at acidic pH in all fractions, being higher in the adult than in the L3 stage. In the former, most of the enzyme was localized in the membrane-bound fractions, whereas in the latter it was mainly in cytosolic fractions. This difference could be correlated with the activity in the gut. In inhibition assays, a difference between cytosolic fractions from resistant and susceptible adults was observed in their response to 1 mmol/L tartaric acid.

Acid Phosphatase↗