PubMed · 8703590
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D Pullan. 1996-06-22. Migraine attacks.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809118
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: A comparative investigation of acrylic denture base surface microhardness, induced through glazing with different photo-activated liquids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermopolymerized acrylic resin Paladon 65 (Kulzer) was used for this study. The samples were mechanically thinned by silicon carbide grinding papers and finally, mechanically polished by alumina pastes. The samples were then glazed with Palaseal, Plaquit and Lightplast-Lack photo-activated liquids. Microhardness tests were carried out via a Zeiss optical microscope equipped with an Anton Paar microhardness tester fitted with a Knoop indenter. RESULTS: Microhardness testing performed on surfaces glazed by Plaquit, Lightplast-Lack, and Palaseal photo-activated liquids showed enhanced microhardness values compared to the mechanically polished acrylic resin denture base material. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative microhardness tests performed on acrylic base resin treated with photo-activated acrylic glazes showed that all increases the surface microhardness. The enhancement of surface microhardness of acrylic denture bases suggests that they are likely to resist wear during service.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the formation of dental biofilm by Streptococcus sobrinus on different types of restorative materials, using a model consisting of host and bacterial constituents. METHODS: The adsorption pattern of saliva to the restorative material was determined by means of gel electrophoresis coupled with computerized densitometry techniques. The amount of salivary proteins adsorbed onto the surfaces was measured using the Bradford method. Sucrose-dependent bacterial adhesion to the saliva-coated restorative material was tested by radioactive-labelled Streptococcus sobrinus, and viable counts of these bacteria in the biofilm was determined using bacterial culture techniques. RESULTS: Different adsorption patterns by salivary proteins to restorative materials were recorded. Durafil and acrylic dental materials demonstrated the most affinity to salivary proteins. A surface dependent adhesion profile was recorded, showing a high affinity of albumin and amylase to Acrylic and Durafil materials. Bacterial accumulation was the highest with Fuji LC and Fuji GC, which also demonstrated the highest bacterial viability. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the specificity of biofilm formation on different brands of dental restorative materials. Formation of a variety of dental biofilms has a significant impact on the progression of dental diseases in the oral cavity.