Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8635613

Screening concerns.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Frelick. 1996. Screening concerns.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8635613/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

High tumor amplification burden is associated with TP53 mutations in the pan-cancer setting.

Next-generation sequencing data is fundamentally changing the clinical management of patients with cancer. The most frequent genomic alterations in malignancy are mutations and amplifications, with a subset of tumors having multiple amplifications - "amplificators". We sought to understand the molecular correlates of high tumor amplification burden in a pan-cancer context. Using both national registries and a single-institution dataset, our results demonstrate that cancers with TP53 mutations (as compared to those with wild-type TP53) exhibited significantly higher tumor amplification burden across all datasets. Amplifications, generally associated with overexpression, may be potentially actionable secondary consequences of TP53 mutations.

Biomarkers, Tumor

Immune biomarkers and response to checkpoint inhibition of BRAFV600 and BRAF non-V600 altered lung cancers.

BACKGROUND: While 2-4% of lung cancers possess alterations in BRAF, little is known about the immune responsiveness of these tumours. METHODS: Clinical and genomic data were collected from 5945 patients with lung cancers whose tumours underwent next-generation sequencing between 2015 and 2018. Patients were&#xa0;followed through 2020. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients with metastatic BRAF-altered lung cancers were identified: 29 tumours had Class I mutations, 59 had Class II/III alterations, and 39 had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Tumour mutation burden was higher in Class II/III than Class I-altered tumours (8.8 mutations/Mb versus 4.9, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), but this difference was diminished when stratified by smoking status. The overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was 9% in Class I-altered tumours and 26% in Class II/III (P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.25), with median time on treatment of 1.9 months in both groups. Among patients with Class I-III-altered tumours, 36-month HR for death in those who ever versus never received ICI was 1.82 (1.17-6.11). Nine patients were on ICI for >2 years (two with Class I mutations, two with Class II/III alterations, and five with VUS). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with BRAF-altered lung cancers achieved durable disease control on ICI. However, collectively no significant clinical benefit was seen.

Biomarkers, Tumor

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 is an independent poor prognostic factor for survival in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

High levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in tissue extracts have been associated with poor prognosis in many epithelial cancers. Ovarian cancers contain a higher concentration of PAI-1 than benign ovarian tumors or normal ovaries. Reports, however, on the prognostic value of PAI-1 content in ovarian cancers have been conflicting. We used immunohistochemistry to study the primary and metastatic tissues from 131 epithelial ovarian cancer cases. This group has been previously characterized for the expression of urokinase (uPA), uPA receptor, PAI-2 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1). The intensity and extent of staining for PAI-1 in the tumor epithelium was scored. Kaplan-Meier curves of survival were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox regression model was utilized for multivariate analysis. Approximately 50% of the primary tumors and metastases expressed PAI-1. Among invasive stages III and IV patients, those whose primary tumors expressed PAI-1 had a shorter overall survival. The combination of strong expression of PAI-1 and expression of uPA was a highly significant factor for short disease-free and overall survival. Similar results were seen with the combination of high PAI-1 and low PAI-2 expression. Strong PAI-1 expression was significantly associated with expression of uPA receptor or CSF-I in the tumor epithelium, but not with standard clinical parameters, and was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival on multivariate analysis. Our results show that PAI-1 expression in the primary tumor epithelium is an independent poor prognostic factor for survival, underscoring the tumor protective role of PAI-1 in ovarian cancer biology.

Biomarkers, Tumor