PubMed · 8611066
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C J Allen. 1996. Surgeries.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430140018003
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
When analyzing original articles since the sixteenth century, it becomes apparent that all surgical techniques for repair of the inguinal hernial orifice can be traced back to two simple repair principles. The first is reinforcement of the anterior wall of the inguinal canal and tightening of the external inguinal ring (Stromayr 1559, Purmann 1694, Czerny 1877), and the second is reinforcement of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and the tightening of the internal inguinal ring, either externally (Lucas-Championnière 1881, Bassini 1889, Lotheissen 1898, McVay 1942, Shouldice 1945, Lichtenstein 1987, Stoppa 1989) or via an intraabdominal approach by laparotomy (Tait 1891) or laparoscopically (Ger 1990, Velez and Klein 1990). We have tried to provide a systematic order to the diverse procedures of surgery of inguinal hernias according to their repair principles. We also point out their historical development.
Clinical practice guidelines are becoming an important determinant of how we practice medicine and surgery. They are the strategy of our federal agencies to reduce variability in care, improve quality, measure outcomes, and reduce costs. The payors and entrepreneurs of medicine have endorsed the use of practice guidelines as the most efficacious way to manage costs, and variability. This economic force alone will perpetuate their development in the foreseeable future. It could be tempting to recoil from these pressures that may seem outside the realm of the individual surgeon trying to do the best for the individual patient. However, when viewed as a way to work with our colleagues and use scientific evidence and expert opinion to achieve consensus about best practice, this effort is very much in line with the way we practice surgery. The surgical community should not be concerned with participating but, in fact, should lead. The surgical tradition with outcomes assessment-the Morbidity and Mortality Conference-is a fundamental principle used to improve care. The process of practice guideline development is designed to do the same to continuously improve care.