Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9046881

Clinical practice guidelines.

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines are becoming an important determinant of how we practice medicine and surgery. They are the strategy of our federal agencies to reduce variability in care, improve quality, measure outcomes, and reduce costs. The payors and entrepreneurs of medicine have endorsed the use of practice guidelines as the most efficacious way to manage costs, and variability. This economic force alone will perpetuate their development in the foreseeable future. It could be tempting to recoil from these pressures that may seem outside the realm of the individual surgeon trying to do the best for the individual patient. However, when viewed as a way to work with our colleagues and use scientific evidence and expert opinion to achieve consensus about best practice, this effort is very much in line with the way we practice surgery. The surgical community should not be concerned with participating but, in fact, should lead. The surgical tradition with outcomes assessment-the Morbidity and Mortality Conference-is a fundamental principle used to improve care. The process of practice guideline development is designed to do the same to continuously improve care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D B Hoyt. 1997. Clinical practice guidelines.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(96)00378-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Severity scores in surgery: what for and who needs them? An introduction: definition, aims, classification and evaluation.

Every patient represents a unique and complex situation a clinician has to deal with. In order to cope with this complexity of information, reduction is necessary, especially in communication about diseases or therapy. The first reduction is made when a patient is given a diagnosis which reflects a constellation of similar symptoms. A score also reduces the given amount of clinical data into a one-dimensional value. The primary aim of a score is a systematic comparison between patients and institutions. Scores reduce information to focus on the essentials. They are used for severity classification and prognosis, evaluation of outcome and treatment effects, case-mix adjustments in comparative audits, and economic evaluation. Quality criteria of score systems which should be considered in the development and application are: reliability, validity, measurability, applicability, and clinical relevance. This introductory article gives a brief description of these terms.

General Surgery↗