PubMed · 8454970
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C Elliott. 1993. Cryosurgery.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8454970/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the extent of retinal vessel development present on early screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity has prognostic value? DESIGN: The prospectively collected data from the Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity were used to compare the development of acute retinopathy of prematurity and long-term structural and visual outcomes for eyes with differing extents of retinal vessel development. PATIENT: Study patients had eyes with the following vessel development. In zone I eyes, vessels extended from the disc less than twice the distance from the disc to the macula. In zone II eyes, vessels extended beyond zone I but not to the nasal ora serrata. Transitional eyes had vessels partly in zone I and partly in zone II. RESULTS: The chance of developing threshold retinopathy of prematurity was inversely related to the early degree of vessel development: 54% for zone I eyes, 25% for transitional eyes, and 8% for zone II eyes. The presence of prominent iris vessels at 34 to 35 weeks of postmenstrual age was associated with increased risk for all three groups; zone I eyes almost always needed treatment (94%). The chance of having an unfavorable anatomic alteration of the posterior fundus, or poor vision at the ages of 1 year and 3 1/2 years, was also inversely related to the degree of early vessel development. Vessel development was an independently important factor even when birth weight, gestational age, and race were considered. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of early retinal vessel development is a significant predictor of outcome from retinopathy of prematurity. Iris vessel dilatation is an important indication for greater vigilance in following these infants.
Curative surgery is not feasible in a considerable proportion of patients with rectal cancer because of extensive local spread or metastatic disease. However, most of these patients require palliative treatment to improve the symptoms of the disease, e.g. obstruction, pain and haemorrhage. Palliative surgery may be associated with a morbidity of 20-40% and a mortality of more than 10%. Endoscopic procedures can provide effective palliation with less complications. Before the development of lasers, endoscopic electrocoagulation and cryosurgery were used with some success. Currently, endoscopic Nd:YAG photocoagulation must be considered the treatment of choice in non-resectable rectal cancer. Laser therapy allows effective palliation in 85-95% of the patients, and generally, treatment-related complications occur in less than 10% of the patients and mortality is negligible. Transanal endoscopic resection may be effective in selected patients. New approaches to endoscopic palliation include photodynamic therapy (PDT) and implantation of self-expanding metal stents.