PubMed · 8421493
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T Enoch, A Carr, P Nurse. 1993-01-07. Checkpoint check.. https://doi.org/10.1038/361026b0
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The INO1 gene of yeast is expressed in logarithmically growing, wild-type cells when inositol is absent from the medium. However, the INO1 gene is repressed when inositol is present during logarithmic growth and it is also repressed as cells enter stationary phase whether inositol is present or not. In this report, we demonstrate that transient nitrogen limitation also causes INO1 repression. The repression of INO1 in response to nitrogen limitation shares many features in common with repression in response to the presence of inositol. Specifically, the response to nitrogen limitation is dependent upon the presence of a functional OPI1 gene product, it requires ongoing phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and it is mediated by the repeated element, UASINO, found in the promoter of INO1 and other co-regulated genes of phospholipid biosynthesis. Thus, we propose that repression of INO1 in response to inositol and in response to nitrogen limitation occurs via a common mechanism that is sensitive to the status of ongoing phospholipid metabolism.
The chromosomes of eukaryotes are organized into structurally and functionally discrete domains that provide a mechanism to compact the DNA as well as delineate independent units of gene activity. It is believed that insulator/boundary elements separate these domains. Here we report the identification and characterization of boundary elements that flank the transcriptionally repressed HMR locus in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Deletion of these boundary elements led to the spread of silenced chromatin, whereas the ectopic insertion of these elements between a silencer and a promoter blocked the repressive effects of the silencer on that promoter at HMR and at telomeres. Sequence analysis indicated that the boundary element contained a TY1 LTR, and a tRNA gene and mutational analysis has implicated the Smc proteins, which encode structural components of chromosomes, in boundary element function.
The analysis of mRNA turnover often requires a knowledge of the pathway by which a particular mRNA is being degraded. In this article we describe experimental procedures that can be used to determine the mechanism of degradation for yeast transcripts. These approaches include the insertion of strong secondary structures to block exonuclease cleavage and thereby trap decay intermediates. In addition, mRNA decay pathways can be analyzed by using regulatable promoters to perform transcriptional pulse-chase experiments, thereby allowing the determination of precursor-product relationships during the mRNA decay process. Finally, the mechanism of mRNA degradation can also now be determined by using trans-acting mutations specific for distinct mRNA turnover pathways. Most importantly, the combination of these three approaches can often clearly define the mechanism(s) by which a given transcript is degraded.