Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 835397

ECG data processing with the Hanover program.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Abel, C Zywietz, W Schiemann, W Alraun. 1977. ECG data processing with the Hanover program.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000399638

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Atrial arrhythmias in dual chamber pacing and their influence on long-term mortality.

A retrospective study of 252 patients who received a DDD pacemaker between October 1982 and December 1990 was performed. During a mean follow-up of 30 months, reprogramming to the VVI mode was necessary in 39 patients (15.5%). Technical problems causing downgrading occurred 15 times, of which 13 problems became permanent. A total number of 24 patients had sustained atrial arrhythmias, including 14 with atrial fibrillation and 10 with atrial flutter. In this group, conversion to sinus rhythm could be obtained in 38%. After 2 years, reliable DDD pacing was maintained in 86% of the surviving patients. The survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% and 89%, respectively, and was not influenced by arrhythmias or technical problems. We conclude that atrial arrhythmias including flutter are the most important reasons for reprogramming to the VVI mode, although in an important number of patients, predominantly those with flutter, restoration of AV synchrony can be obtained. The high number of patients with atrial flutter could imply some role for DDD devices offering the option of antitachycardia pacing. Reprogramming of the pacing mode did not influence mortality.

Arrhythmia, Sinus

Atrioventricular conduction disturbances in patients with sinoatrial node disease and atrial pacing.

In sinoatrial node disease (SND) atrial pacing may be limited by progression of AV block. The incidence of AV block after AAI systems implantation range, according to various authors, from 0% to 12%. The aim of this study was to examine the AV conduction disturbances that forced a change in the mode of pacing in patients with AAI pacemakers. The information was collected retrospectively from a cohort of 122 patients. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 83 months (mean = 35). Among these patients there were 37 with sinus bradycardia and 85 with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome. Their mean age was 63 years. Before AAI pacemaker insertion, all patients had normal AV conduction on 12-lead ECG, and all but five had a Wenckebach cycle length shorter than 500 msec. Seven out of these 122 patients (5.7%) developed symptomatic conduction disturbances (second-degree type I AV block in five, second degree type II AV block in one, and third-degree AV block in one), necessitating a change from AAI to another mode of pacing. We conclude that progression of AV block after atrial pacemaker implantation in patients with SND is infrequent and mild in the majority of cases. Intraventricular disturbances such as left anterior hemiblock represent contraindication to AAI pacing particularly in patients who may be in need of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Arrhythmia, Sinus