Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8333363

Computerized mammography data base systems.

Abstract

A computerized mammography data base system is a specialized radiology information system that is usually maintained on personal computers and is designed to facilitate the data processing tasks associated with mammography. This article is intended to assist readers in developing an organized approach to evaluating or designing a computerized mammography data base system, and to help in determining if such a system is feasible. Some initial decisions are necessary. Consideration should be given to how mammograms are currently processed in the department to be computerized. It may be helpful to draw a detailed flow chart of the procedures that are followed as a mammogram is acquired and paperwork is assembled, and then chart the flow of information from the mammographer outward (e.g., to a transcriptionist, to referring physicians, to patients). These steps are essential to define how current procedures can be enhanced by computerization and will also indicate current methods that can be modified vs those that personnel are unwilling to change. Such analysis provides a template by which commercially available systems can be evaluated, and it is a necessary first step for those who decide to design a system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M S Frank. 1993. Computerized mammography data base systems.. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.161.2.8333363

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Phantom evaluation of the effect of film processing on mammographic screen-film combinations.

Mammographic image quality should be optimal for diagnosis, and the film contrast can be manipulated by altering development parameters. In this study phantom test objects were radiographed and processed for a given range of developer temperatures and times for four film-screen systems. Radiologists scored the phantom test objects on the resultant films to evaluate the effect on diagnosis of varying image contrast. While for three film-screen systems processing led to appreciable contrast differences, for only one film system did maximum contrast correspond with optimal phantom test object scoring. The inability to show an effect on diagnosis in all cases is possibly due to the variation in radiologist responses found in this study and in normal clinical circumstances. Other technical factors such as changes in film fog, grain and mottle may contribute to the study findings.

Mammography