Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8290793

[Orphan diseases].

Abstract

Basic investigation in industrial laboratories are mainly addressed to widespread diseases. It follows that: 1) basic research is addressed chiefly to the well known and largely diffuse diseases; 2) rare diseases are not usually studied and therefore little chance is given to their physiopathological or therapeutic knowledge. Hence the name of orphan diseases. The aim of this study is to contribute to the stimulation of innovative and applied basic research of orphan diseases and therefore to gradually confine the number of incurable rare diseases. Our proposal upsets the studies undertaken in some foreign countries and Italy on the orphan drugs (e.g. Orphan Drug Act, issued in the USA in 1982) since we suggest starting from a study on disease more than studies on drug. The planning of studies of disease may be undertaken on various points of view (prevalence, clinical features, prognosis, social cost, etc.), while this may be very hard for the drug. Therefore we suggest starting from a study plane, classification and estimation of rare diseases, shared for apparatus. These studies may be undertaken on a vigorous rationale (more than studies on orphan drugs) and therefore they may bring about to the definition of a national (government) planning for addressing consistent financial resources to the study of pathophysiology and therapy (or prevention) of the major orphan diseases. Adequate studies within the European Community may be planned in the near future, since most rare diseases are presumed to have a common distribution within the Community.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Loizzo, M T Tebano. 1993. [Orphan diseases].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8290793/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The origin of individual differences in the course and severity of diseases.

Any disease manifests itself individually either by a bright or restricted spectrum of clinical signs and resultant clinical courses that range from asymptomatic to deadly, from acute to chronic, etc. Until recently, the origin of this kind of biodiversity was poorly investigated and understood, but advances in immunology--especially in identifying constitutional (genetic) mechanisms of immunity--have contributed to our understanding of the origin of individual diversity in diseases. Any disease destroys only focal areas in the affected organisms, and the amounts, sizes, and distribution of such focal lesions vary from patient to patient. In a population predilected to a relevant pathogenic agent, individuals can be conveniently divided into three categories: totally resistant organisms that contain no susceptible structures and are not affected; mildly susceptible organisms in which a few foci appear and in which the disease runs a benign course; organisms in which the number of constitutionally susceptible structures is high and the disease develops in a severe form. The diversity is formed by the mating of genetically different parents that determines the differences in susceptibility of genetically various parts of the descendant organism.

Disease↗

The conceptualisation of health and disease in veterinary medicine.

BACKGROUND: The concept of health, as well as the concept of disease, is central in veterinary medicine. However, the definitions "health" and "disease" are not generally acknowledged by veterinarians. The aim of this study was to examine how the concepts "health" and "disease" are defined in veterinary textbooks. METHODS: Veterinary textbooks in several disciplines were investigated, but only textbooks with explicit definitions of the concepts were selected for examination. RESULTS: Eighty out of the 500 relevant books within veterinary medicine were written for non-veterinarians. Eight percent of the books had an explicit definition of health and/or disease. More frequently, textbooks written for non veterinarians did have definitions of health or disease, compared to textbooks written for professionals. A division of health definitions in five different categories was suggested, namely: 1. Health as normality, 2. Health as biological function, 3. Health as homeostasis, 4. Health as physical and psychological well-being and 5. Health as productivity including reproduction. CONCLUSION: Few veterinary textbooks had any health or disease definition at all. Furthermore, explicit definitions of health stated by the authors seemed to have little impact on how health and disease are handled within the profession. Veterinary medicine would probably gain from theoretical discussions about health and disease.

Disease↗