PubMed · 8252062
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G S Brindley. 1993. Future directions.. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.1930120517
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A 4-hour observation period has been used in infants to investigate suspected bladder dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to extend the usefulness of this protocol by establishing reference values for voiding frequency, intervals, volumes, and residual urine in healthy newborns. The study included 51 healthy newborns, 26 girls and 25 boys, aged 3 to 14 days. During a 4-hour period, all micturitions and residuals were recorded as well as feeding, sleeping, crying, and defecations. The observation was completed with the child undressed to observe the urinary stream during one void. Different provocation tests were tried to induce urinary leakage. All newborns voided with a stream, about once per hour, with a median volume of 23 mL. For each voiding parameter, there was a large inter- and intra-individual variability. Double voidings were common as well as sizable residual volumes. The diuresis was about six times higher than in healthy school children. The healthy newborns did not leak during provocation tests such as manual compression of the bladder. Neurourol. Urodynam. 19:177-184, 2000.
"Fecal incontinence" is defined as the involuntary loss of stool at any time of life after toilet training. It is a socially and psychologically devastating condition for patients and their families, and a topic which both patients and physicians are reluctant to approach. Although the true prevalence of fecal incontinence is unknown, studies have reported it to be as high as 2. 2% in the general population, with significantly higher rates among nursing home residents and hospitalized elderly. Risk factors include advancing age, female gender and multiparity. An understanding of pelvic floor anatomy and physiology is required to appreciate how diverse medical conditions can affect mechanisms involved in normal continence. The rectum serves as a storage reservoir until elimination can take place at a socially acceptable time and place. The pelvic floor muscles help to regulate the defecatory process and maintain continence. These muscles include the internal anal sphincter, the external anal sphincter and the puborectalis muscle. Each muscle contributes to normal continence, although the relative importance of each is controversial. Neurologic integrity and sensation are also key factors. Conditions associated with fecal incontinence include diarrheal states, fecal impaction, idiopathic neurologic injury, surgical and obstetric injury, pelvic trauma, collagen vascular disease, and neurologic impairment related to stroke, diabetes, or multiple sclerosis. Evaluation of the patient with fecal incontinence includes a directed history and physical examination, with particular attention paid to integrity of the perineum and rectum, and a complete neurologic evaluation. Diagnostic tools such as stool studies, anorectal manometry, defecography, electromyography, pudendal nerve conduction, and endoanal ultrasound may be employed in an outpatient setting. Fecal incontinence may be treated conservatively by employing such methods as dietary restriction, stool bulking agents, and biofeedback. Surgery may be the best option for cases refractory to medical treatment, or for those patients with rectocele or obstetrical injury. In this article, we review the presentation, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and etiology of fecal incontinence. Evaluation, including key components of directed history and physical examination, and the appropriate use of diagnostic studies and indications for treatment options are also addressed.
Gynecologists have traditionally evaluated rectocele repair by its effect on vaginal function; coloproctologists have traditionally evaluated its effect on bowel function. Hence different operative criteria and surgical techniques have arisen, but with very little prospective, objective evaluation. The purpose of this review is to describe the surgical techniques used to repair the rectocele and the most common investigations used during its evaluation. Anorectal investigations identify concomitant pathology, may explain pathophysiology, provide objective outcome criteria and attempt to predict the patients that will most benefit from surgery. However, because of the complex neuromuscular, physiological and mechanical interactions that contribute to impaired rectal emptying, their usefulness in improving functional outcome has been limited. Many patients experience improvement, but still are left with some symptoms of impaired defecation despite anatomic correction.