Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8200668

An adaptive lung ventilation controller.

Abstract

Closed loop control of ventilation is traditionally based on end-tidal or mean expired CO2. The controlled variables are the respiratory rate RR and the tidal volume VT. Neither patient size or lung mechanics were considered in previous approaches. Also the modes were not suitable for spontaneously breathing subjects. This report presents a new approach to closed loop controlled ventilation, called Adaptive Lung Ventilation (ALV). ALV is based on a pressure controlled ventilation mode suitable for paralyzed, as well as spontaneously breathing, subjects. The clinician enters a desired gross alveolar ventilation (V'gA in l/min), and the ALV controller tries to achieve this goal by automatic adjustment of mechanical rate and inspiratory pressure level. The adjustments are based on measurements of the patient's lung mechanics and series dead space. The ALV controller was tested on a physical lung model with adjustable mechanical properties. Three different lung pathologies were simulated on the lung model to test the controller for rise time (T90), overshoot (Ym), and steady state performance (delta max). The pathologies corresponded to restrictive lung disease (similar to ARDS), a "normal" lung, and obstructive lung disease (such as asthma). Furthermore, feasibility tests were done in 6 patients undergoing surgical procedures in total intravenous anesthesia. In the model studies, the controller responded to step changes between 48 seconds and 81 seconds. It did exhibit an overshoot between 5.5% and 7.9% of the setpoint after the step change.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T P Laubscher, W Heinrichs, N Weiler, G Hartmann, J X Brunner. 1994. An adaptive lung ventilation controller.. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.277271

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Catheter tracking for MR fluoroscopy: design of a transmit/receive coil for use with a nasogastric tube.

A coil tuned to 21.3 MHz was incorporated into a nasogastric tube and used as a marker of tube position during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in a 0.5-T scanner. Catheter tracking was investigated with the coil used in both transmit/receive and in receive-only modes. Data acquired from this coil were overlaid on images obtained using the body coil of the scanner. Visualization of the full length of the catheter with local high signal at the tip was achieved with a temporal resolution of approximately 1 second. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:127-130.

Equipment Design↗

Use of multicoil arrays for separation of signal from multiple slices simultaneously excited.

Increased acquisition efficiency has been achieved by exciting several slices simultaneously. The mixed data were unfolded to produce separate slices using the spatial encoding information inherent in a multicoil receiver system. Each coil yields a linear combination of signals from all excited slices weighted by the sensitivity of each coil. A matrix inversion provides a solution to unfold these images.

Equipment Design↗

Application of the SUSHI method to the design of gradient coils.

An approach to potential improvements in magnetic field shielding for a gradient coil system with cylindrical geometry is presented, utilizing "supershielding" conditions for the currents on both the primary and the secondary coils. It is demonstrated that the field can be strongly suppressed everywhere outside a cylindrical shield coil radius, even though the finite-length active shield only partially surrounds a primary coil. The supershielding method, which is aimed at controlling eddy currents, still has sufficient freedom to maintain the desired magnetic field behavior inside the imaging volume. The trade-off is an additional primary current oscillation and increased current peaks and field energy. This method has been applied to design short transverse and axial gradient coils, giving substantially improved shielding compared to an apodization method. Magn Reson Med 45:147-155, 2001.

Equipment Design↗