Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8135224

Comments on mandibular condyle position.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W S Kirk. 1994. Comments on mandibular condyle position.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8135224/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Mandibular centricity: centric relation.

Centric relation can be a confusing term because it continues to evolve in meaning. This article presents a discussion of the historical aspects of centric relation. Guidelines to decide when to use centric relation in clinical dentistry are included.

Centric Relation

Overview of articulation materials and methods for the prosthodontic patient.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Many methods and materials are available for registering the centric relation position, with various degrees of accuracy. Once the centric relation position is recorded, many instruments are available for cast articulation. These articulators range from simple to complex devices that generate different mandibular movements depending on the sophistication of the instrument. PURPOSE: This review evaluated the methods and materials used to record the centric relation position and eccentric maxillomandibular relations, and to compare the articulators available for mounting casts. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was completed (from 1966-present) along with personal searches of selected journals to find additional publications that addressed these materials, methods of registration, and available instrumentation. CONCLUSION: Potential applications of this review are as follows: (1) to allow the reader to examine the various methods for recording the centric relation position that have been studied and described, and (2) to observe how the accuracy of recording materials have changed over time. The reader will also realize the types of simple and complex articulators that exist, along with the different degrees of simulated mandibular movements that may be accomplished.

Centric Relation

Diagnostic criteria for pseudo-Class III malocclusion.

The aim of this study is to identify the diagnostic criteria for pseudo-Class III malocclusion and compare it with Class I malocclusion in the southern Chinese population. Sixty-seven patients (mean age, 10.9 +/- 1.8 years) were included in this study; 36 patients represented pseudo-Class III malocclusion. Selection criteria included the following: (1) anterior crossbite (at least 2 incisors with negative overjet and overbite); (2) mandibular displacement; (3) all patients were southern Chinese who had been followed after the growth spurt, none had developed a skeletal Class III malocclusion; (4) the patients were treated for an average of 7 months to procline upper incisors and retrocline lower incisors. None of the cases received any treatment that might affect skeletal growth. Thirty-one patients with Class I malocclusion were included in the Class I malocclusion group for the comparison of dentoskeletal characteristics with the pseudo-Class III malocclusion group. Selection criteria included the following: (1) skeletal Class I malocclusion with normal overjet and overbite, (2) mild to moderate crowding with Class I molar relationship, (3) straight facial profile. The following were included in the assessment of pseudo-Class III malocclusion cases: (1) family history, (2) molar and canine relationships at habitual occlusion and centric relation, and (3) dentoskeletal morphology. The results were that 72% of the examined cases in the pseudo-Class III malocclusion group showed no family history and 75% showed Class I molar relationship at habitual occlusion. Compared with the Class I malocclusion group, subjects in the pseudo-Class III malocclusion group showed a significantly decreased midface length, increased maxillary-mandibular difference, more retroclined upper incisors, and a retrusive upper lip. In conclusion, a pseudo-Class III malocclusion is characterized by retroclined upper incisors, retrusive upper lip, decreased midface length, and increased maxillary-mandibular difference. Findings of this study showed that patients with a pseudo-Class III malocclusion exhibit certain morphologic, dental, and skeletal characteristics that should be of aid in the diagnosis of pseudo-Class III malocclusion.

Centric Relation