Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8093509

Sumatriptan.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D N Bateman. 1993-01-23. Sumatriptan.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)90079-v

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dose-related preventive and therapeutic effects of antioxidants-anticarcinogens on experimentally induced malignant tumors in Wistar rats.

A combination of antioxidants-anticarcinogens, consisting of vitamins C and E, selenium and 2-mercaptopropionyl glycine (2-MPG), was administered orally for the prevention (PRG) and treatment (TRG) of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)-induced malignant tumors (leiomyosarcomas), in Wistar rats. In order to evaluate dose-related effects, a low dose vitamin (0.15 g/kg b.w. per day of vit.C and 0.05 g/kg b.w. per day of vit.E) and a high dose (1.5 g/kg b.w. per day of vit.C and 0.5 g/kg b.w. per day of vit.E) combination was administered, in prevention and treatment groups. Selenium was administered in doses of 2 microg/kg b.w. per day and 2-MPG in 15 mg/kg b.w. per day, in all groups. Daily estimations of 24 h urine volume levels of thiobarbituric acid reacting substances (MDA) were performed in 20 animals, divided into a control group, a BaP-injected group, a tricapryline-injected group and a BaP-injected and treated by the low dose combination group. Results revealed that the low dose combination failed to exert any beneficial effect on mean survival time of animals treated either preventitively or therapeutically. An increased number of animals bearing a second (lung) tumor was, in addition, found in autopsy and histological examination in the low dose combination (PRG and TRG) and the high dose TRG groups. The high dose combination groups manifested a significant prolongation of the mean survival time of animals; complete remission of tumors developed in 16.8% of the animals in the treatment group and a 5.2% prevention of tumor formation in the preventive group, without any evidence of an increased number of double tumor formation in the PRG group. Urine MDA increased significantly in animals injected by BaP during the first 10 days and since the 90th day (formation of palpable tumors) after injection, in relation to control and tricapryline-injected groups. Complete prevention of urine MDA-increased values was obtained in BaP-injected and treated by the low dose combination animals. Results indicate that high doses (megadoses) of the antioxidant-anticarcinogen vitamins C and E in combination with carefully selected other antioxidants possessing supplementary actions, are probably needed in order to achieve a sufficient prevention and treatment of malignant diseases.

Administration, Oral

A cholera toxoid-insulin conjugate as an oral vaccine against spontaneous autoimmune diabetes.

Mucosally induced immunological tolerance is an attractive strategy for preventing or treating illnesses resulting from untoward inflammatory immune reactions against self- or non-self-antigens. Oral administration of relevant autoantigens and allergens has been reported to delay or suppress onset of clinical disease in a number of experimental autoimmune and allergic disorders. However, the approach often requires repeated feeding of large amounts of tolerogens over long periods and is only partly effective in animals already systemically sensitized to the ingested antigen such as in animals already harboring autoreactive T cells, and thus presumably also in humans with an autoimmune disease. We have recently shown that oral administration of microgram amounts of antigen coupled to cholera toxin B subunit (CTB), can effectively suppress systemic T cell reactivity in naive as well as in immune animals. We now report that feeding small amounts (2-20 microg) of human insulin conjugated to CTB can effectively suppress beta cell destruction and clinical diabetes in adult nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. The protective effect could be transferred by T cells from CTB-insulin-treated animals and was associated with reduced lesions of insulitis. Furthermore, adoptive co-transfer experiments involving injection of Thy-1,2 recipients with diabetogenic T cells from syngeneic mice and T cells from congenic Thy-1,1 mice fed with CTB-insulin demonstrated a selective recruitment of Thy-1,1 donor cells in the peripancreatic lymph nodes concomitant with reduced islet cell infiltration. These results suggest that protection against autoimmune diabetes can be achieved by feeding minute amounts of a pancreas islet cell autoantigen linked to CTB and appears to involve the selective migration and retention of protective T cells into lymphoid tissues draining the site of organ injury.

Administration, Oral

Five-day oral etoposide treatment for advanced small-cell lung cancer: randomized comparison with intravenous chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Oral etoposide is an active single agent in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is widely prescribed as first-line treatment as an alternative to intravenous combination chemotherapy in patients with extensive disease. PURPOSE: The intention of this study was to determine if the effects of oral etoposide therapy on survival and quality of life are equivalent to those of intravenous chemotherapy. METHODS: In a randomized trial of palliative treatment in advanced SCLC, oral etoposide (100 mg given twice daily for 5 days) was compared with intravenous chemotherapy consisting of alternating cycles of cisplatin and etoposide (PE) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV). Six cycles of chemotherapy were administered every 21 days in both regimens. Symptom control and quality of life were measured with the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and a daily diary card. In January 1996, after 155 patients had been randomly assigned from a projected intake of 365 patients, an independent Data Monitoring Committee examined the interim results. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the logrank test was used to compare treatments. For quality-of-life comparisons, average scores were calculated for each time point. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine any significant overall differences between treatments. For the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, separate analyses were done for each subset (psychological well-being, physical symptoms, lung cancer symptoms, treatment symptoms, activity, and quality of life). Response rates and toxicity scores were compared by using chi2. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Survival was inferior at 1 year in the oral etoposide group compared with intravenous therapy (9.8% for oral versus 19.3% for intravenous; difference = 9.5%; 95% confidence interval of difference = 0.3%-18.7%; P<.05), and there was a trend toward inferior overall survival. Median survival was 4.8 months for oral treatment and 5.9 months for intravenous therapy. Progression-free survival was worse in the oral etoposide arm (median = 3.6 months versus 5.6 months; P<.001), as well as overall response rate (32.9% versus 46.3%; P<.01). With the exception of acute nausea and vomiting associated with intravenous chemotherapy, all aspects of symptom control and quality of life were either the same or worse in the oral etoposide group. Study closure was recommended. CONCLUSIONS: These interim results show that this schedule of oral etoposide is inferior to intravenous chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced SCLC and should not be used as first-line treatment of this disease.

Administration, Oral