Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sumatriptan”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Amplification of sumatriptan-induced contractions with phenylephrine, histamine and KCl in the isolated human mesenteric artery: in-vitro evidence for sumatriptan-induced mesenteric ischaemia.

Sumatriptan, a 5-HT(1B/1D/1F) receptor agonist, is used to relieve migraine headache. Sumatriptan contracts some arteries either directly or after modest precontraction with non-serotonergic agonists. Sumatriptan can cause myocardial ischaemia and myocardial infarction. While previous in-vitro studies have shown that sumatriptan has no or only weak contractile activity in human omental arteries, recent clinical studies suggest that sumatriptan may induce mesenteric ischaemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of contractile 5-HT(1B) receptors in the human mesenteric artery and to establish whether the weak sumatriptan-induced contractions are amplified by precontraction with various contractile substances. The study was performed in organ baths using endothelium-denuded isolated human mesenteric arteries. Sumatriptan induced concentration-dependent contractions in some mesenteric arteries [ E(max) 61+/-10% of the maximum contraction induced by 80 mM KCl, pD(2) (-log(10)EC(50)) 6.56+/-0.20, n=9]. In the other mesenteric arteries, sumatriptan induced only very weak ( E(max) <5%) or no contraction ( n=13). GR127935 (3 nM), a selective 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist, antagonized sumatriptan-induced contractions insurmountably in sumatriptan-sensitive arteries. When the resting tension of the arterial rings was increased moderately by threshold concentrations (EC(10)-EC(20) of maximum contraction induced by 80 mM KCl) with the non-5-HT receptor agonists phenylephrine (10-100 nM), histamine (100 nM-1 microM) or the depolarizing agent KCl (4-10 mM), 5-HT(1B) receptor-mediated responses were amplified in sumatriptan-insensitive arteries (with phenylephrine E(max) 82+/-17%, pD(2) 6.64+/-0.20, n=7; with histamine E(max) 107+/-26%, pD(2) 6.16+/-0.14, n=6; with KCl E(max) 78+/-16%, pD(2) 6.45+/-0.15, n=7). These results show that sumatriptan induced concentration-dependent contractions in sumatriptan-sensitive mesenteric arteries and that 5-HT(1B) receptors were present and active in these vessels. However, in sumatriptan-insensitive arteries, precontraction is required for sumatriptan to induce concentration-dependent contractions. These findings suggest that sumatriptan may induce ischaemia in human mesenteric vasculature directly or in the presence of precontractile risk factors.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Treatment of migraine attacks with subcutaneous sumatriptan: first placebo-controlled study. The Subcutaneous Sumatriptan International Study Group.

The results of the very first large-scale placebo-controlled dose-response trial with the novel selective 5-hydroxytryptamine1-like (5HT1-like) receptor agonist sumatriptan are presented. We studied the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous injections of 1 mg, 2 mg and 3 mg of sumatriptan in alleviating migraine attacks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial. Six-hundred and ninety patients were randomized and 685 received study medication. At 30 min, reduction of headache severity to mild or none (primary efficacy endpoint) was achieved in 22% (95% CI: 15-28%) of placebo-treated patients and in 39% (CI: 31-46%) of patients treated with 1 mg sumatriptan, 44% (CI: 36-51%) treated with 2 mg sumatriptan and 55% (CI: 48-63%) treated with 3 mg sumatriptan. Differences from placebo were 17% (CI: 8-27%) for 1 mg sumatriptan, 22% (CI: 13-32%) for 2 mg sumatriptan and 34% (CI: 24-44%) for 3 mg sumatriptan (p < 0.001 for all three comparisons). Other migraine symptoms were also more effectively treated by sumatriptan than by placebo. Subsequently, an open-label 3 mg dose subcutaneous sumatriptan was given to partial or non-responders. Thirty minutes after this open dose the response rate to sumatriptan had improved to between 70 and 80%. Adverse events after sumatriptan were minor and short-lived. We conclude that subcutaneous sumatriptan is well tolerated in doses up to 3 + 3 mg and may rapidly abort migraine attacks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Efficacy, tolerability, and patient satisfaction with 50- and 100-mg sumatriptan tablets in those initially dissatisfied with the efficacy of 50-mg sumatriptan tablets.

BACKGROUND: Both 50- and 100-mg sumatriptan tablets are effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine. However, given a choice between the 2 doses, many patients in clinical practice and clinical studies prefer the 100-mg dose. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess whether patients initially dissatisfied with the efficacy of 50-mg sumatriptan tablets would be satisfied with 100-mg sumatriptan tablets. METHODS: In phase 1 of the study, triptan-naive patients with migraine (International Headache Society diagnosis) received open-label treatment of 3 migraine attacks with 50-mg sumatriptan tablets. At the end of phase 1, those who were dissatisfied with the efficacy but satisfied with the tolerability of 50-mg sumatriptan tablets entered phase 2 and were randomized in a double-blind, parallel-group fashion to receive either 50- or 100-mg sumatriptan tablets for the treatment of 3 attacks. Patients who were satisfied with the efficacy or dissatisfied with the tolerability of the 50-mg tablets in phase 1 were given the option of continuing open-label treatment with 50-mg sumatriptan tablets in phase 2. The primary end point was the percentage of patients satisfied with medication at the end of phase 2 double-blind treatment. Patient satisfaction with specific medication attributes was assessed using the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled in phase 1 of the study (the intent-to-treat population), 609 of whom had evaluable satisfaction data at the end of open-label treatment. Three hundred twenty-six (54%) of these patients were satisfied with 50-mg sumatriptan tablets, whereas 283 (46%) were not satisfied. Among those who were dissatisfied, lack of efficacy was cited as the sole reason for dissatisfaction by 242 (86%). Two hundred thirty-one of those who were dissatisfied with efficacy only and wished to continue the study were randomized to double-blind treatment with either 50-mg sumatriptan tablets (n = 123; 82% female, 18% male; mean age, 37.6 years) or 100-mg sumatriptan tablets (n = 108; 86% female, 14% male; mean age, 36.0 years). The remaining 310 patients elected to continue open-label treatment with 50-mg sumatriptan tablets. At the end of double-blind treatment, 64 of 101 patients (63%) in the 100-mg group indicated that they were satisfied with treatment, compared with 55 of 113 (49%) in the 50-mg group (P = 0.031). Across the 3 attacks treated in the double-blind phase. headache relief 2 hours postdose was reported by 47% to 53% of patients in the 50-mg group and 45% to 60% of patients in the 100-mg group. The overall incidence of patients reporting > or =1 adverse event was 19% (23/123) in the 50-mg group and 22% (24/108) in the 100-mg group. CONCLUSIONS: For most patients, 50 mg is the appropriate starting dose of sumatriptan tablets. In patients who experience inadequate relief with 50 mg, increasing the dose to 100 mg is an appropriate therapeutic option.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy and safety of sumatriptan tablets (25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine: defining the optimum doses of oral sumatriptan.

That sumatriptan tablets are effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine has been established, but the relationship between dose and efficacy has not been adequately defined to date in clinical trials. This multinational double-blind trial (N = 1003) in which patients treated up to three migraine attacks with sumatriptan 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, or placebo, with a second independently randomized dose for headache recurrence, evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of three doses of sumatriptan. The results demonstrate that all doses of sumatriptan were superior (P < 0.05) to placebo in reducing moderate or severe predose headache to mild or no headache 4 hours postdose for each of the three treated attacks; sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg were each superior (P < 0.05) to sumatriptan 25 mg 4 hours postdose for two of three attacks. Sumatriptan (all doses) was similarly effective at relieving nausea and photophobia or phonophobia or both and at reducing clinical disability. Headache recurrence was experienced by similar proportions of patients across treatment groups (35% to 48% after placebo; 26% to 39% after sumatriptan). Relief of recurrent headache 2 hours after the second dose of study medication occurred in greater percentages of patients using any dose of sumatriptan compared with patients using placebo to treat recurrence. The incidence of adverse events with 25-mg and 50-mg sumatriptan tablets was similar to the incidence with placebo and lower than the incidence with 100-mg sumatriptan tablets. These data provide the first demonstration from a large well-controlled clinical trial that both the 50- and 100-mg doses are more effective than the 25-mg dose and that the 50-mg dose is associated with a lower incidence of adverse events than the 100-mg dose.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Oral sumatriptan in preventing headache recurrence after treatment of migraine attacks with subcutaneous sumatriptan.

Headache recurrence (HR) may occur within 24 hours in approximately 40% of migraine attacks initially treated successfully with 6 mg subcutaneous (SC) sumatriptan. This may be due to the short plasma half-life of sumatriptan. We studied whether an additional dose of 100 mg oral sumatriptan 4 hours after treatment of a migraine attack with 6 mg SC sumatriptan could prevent HR. Patients (n = 667) treated up to three migraine attacks in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial. For each attack, they initially took open-label 6 mg SC sumatriptan by autoinjector. Four hours later all patients took either 100 mg oral sumatriptan or matched placebo. Patients could take an additional optional oral dose of 100 mg sumatriptan to treat HR. The primary efficacy end point was the number of successfully treated patients without HR within 24 hours after the initial SC injection for the first study attack. Two hundred twenty-five patients were not assessable for HR, mainly because of protocol violations. Of 442 assessable patients, 82/212 in the sumatriptan-treated group (39%) and 89/230 in the placebo-treated group (39%) reported HR in attack 1. Median times to recurrence were 15.6 hours after sumatriptan and 10.3 hours after placebo (p = 0.006). One hundred mg oral sumatriptan taken 4 hours after 6 mg SC sumatriptan does not prevent HR but significantly delays time to recurrence.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1991

A randomized, double-blind comparison of sumatriptan and Cafergot in the acute treatment of migraine. The Multinational Oral Sumatriptan and Cafergot Comparative Study Group.

The efficacy and safety of oral sumatriptan as a 100-mg dispersible tablet was compared with oral Cafergot (2 mg ergotamine tartrate, 200 mg caffeine) in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial. In the trial, 580 patients were treated from 47 investigating centres in nine European countries. Sumatriptan was significantly more effective than Cafergot at reducing the intensity of headache from severe or moderate to mild or none; 66% (145/220) of those treated with sumatriptan improved in this way by 2 h, compared with 48% (118/246) of those treated with Cafergot (p less than 0.001). The onset of headache resolution was more rapid with sumatriptan, whereas recurrence of migraine headache within 48 h was lower with Cafergot. Sumatriptan was also significantly more effective at reducing the incidence of nausea (p less than 0.001), vomiting (p less than 0.01) and photophobia/phonophobia (p less than 0.001) 2 h after treatment, and fewer patients on sumatriptan (24%) than on Cafergot (44%, p less than 0.001) required other medication after 2 h. The overall incidence of patients reporting adverse events was 45% after sumatriptan and 39% after Cafergot; the difference was not significant. The most commonly reported events in the sumatriptan-treated patients were malaise or fatigue and bad taste; these were generally mild and transient. Nausea and/or vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and dizziness or vertigo were reported by a greater proportion of Cafergot-treated patients. It is concluded that oral sumatriptan was well tolerated and is a more effective acute treatment for migraine than Cafergot.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1991

A placebo-controlled study of intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. The Finnish Sumatriptan Group and the Cardiovascular Clinical Research Group.

A double-blind, randomized, multicentre, parallel-group study was carried out to compare intranasal sumatriptan with placebo in the treatment of migraine. Seventy-four patients (37 in each treatment group) were recruited into the study. Patients received two insufflations of the same treatment (sumatriptan or placebo) 15 min apart. Sumatriptan (20 mg plus 20 mg) was more effective than placebo at relieving headache, defined as a reduction in severity from moderate (grade 2) or severe (grade 3) to mild (grade 1) or none (grade 0), at 60 and 120 min. At 120 min, 75% of patients in the sumatriptan group reported headache relief, compared with 32% of patients in the placebo group (p less than 0.001); 53% of patients in the sumatriptan group were completely pain-free, compared with 11% in the placebo group. A clinically significant reduction in the incidence of nausea, vomiting and photophobia was observed in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group, and sumatriptan was also more effective at reducing the functional disability of the patients. A similar number of patients reported migraine recurrence, within 24 h in both treatment groups. The observed reduction in headache severity, functional disability and nausea following intranasal administration of sumatriptan would appear to obviate the need for a concomitant anti-emetic during a migraine attack. The results support the further development and testing of intranasal sumatriptan.

Absorption↗
PubMed1997

Sumatriptan for migraine attacks in children: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Do children with migraine respond to oral sumatriptan differently from adults?

Oral sumatriptan is an effective acute treatment for migraine in adults, but its efficacy in children is still undetermined. Twenty-three children, aged 8.3 to 16.4 years, took both sumatriptan and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. The primary endpoint was a > or = 50% decrease in pain intensity on a 100-mm visual analogue scale at 2 hours. Other endpoints of efficacy were pain intensity difference (PID), showing pain relief at each time point; summed pain intensity differences (SPIDs), estimating overall pain relief; and preference. Two hours after sumatriptan, 7 of 23 reached the primary endpoint, and after placebo, 5 of 23 (difference 9%, 95% CI for difference, -21 to 38%; p = ns). Within 2 hours, the headache disappeared completely in 5 of 23 children after sumatriptan and in 2 of 23 children after placebo (p = ns). Median PIDs were slightly better for sumatriptan between 0.5 and 4 hours (p = ns). Median SPIDs increased almost identically up to 2 hours. Thereafter, median SPIDs for placebo remained practically constant, whereas for sumatriptan, the improvement continued. At 4 hours, the median SPID for sumatriptan was 2.4 times as high as for placebo. However, the maximum differences between median SPIDs at 4 hours (38.5, 95% CI, -75.8 to 57.5; Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 0.4) or at any other point were not statistically significant. Of the 23 children, 13 preferred sumatriptan and 2 placebo (sign test, p = 0.004). The failure of this and previous controlled studies suggests that the response of children to sumatriptan may be different from adults.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

Efficacy of subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of early-morning migraine: a placebo-controlled trial. Early-Morning Migraine Sumatriptan Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of self-administered subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of early-morning migraine attacks. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. SETTING: Thirteen neurology centres in France. SUBJECTS: Patients of either sex, 18-65 years old, with two to six attacks of migraine (according to the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria, with or without aura) per month, of which at least two had to be early-morning migraine attacks. One-hundred-and-one patients were included, 96 being evaluable for the first attack and 81 for the cross-over design. INTERVENTIONS: Two migraine attacks (grade 2/3) were treated with sumatriptan (6 mg) or placebo, with an optional second injection 1-24 h later. Main outcome measures. The primary end-point was headache relief: reduction in headache severity from grade 2/3 (moderate/severe) to grade 1/0 (mild/none) 2 h after treatment. RESULTS: Sumatriptan was superior to placebo for headache relief (32 [78%] vs. 11 [28%] at the first attack; 29 [73%] vs. 8 [20%] at the second; P < 0.001). Because of a significant carry-over effect for some of the secondary end-points, a parallel-group analysis of the first attack was performed, which confirmed a significantly higher efficacy of sumatriptan for all end-points: pain-free rate (22 [46%] vs. 7 [15%]; P = 0.001) and use of a second injection (26 [53%] vs. 38 [81%]; P = 0.004). Sumatriptan was preferred by 74% of patients vs. 17% for placebo, and 9% expressed no preference (P < 0.0001). After complete relief, headache reappeared in 8/23 (35%) patients with sumatriptan and 3/7 (43%) with placebo. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with sumatriptan but they were minor and transient. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous sumatriptan auto-injection is an effective and well-tolerated acute treatment of early-morning migraine attacks allowing earlier return to normal activity.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Sumatriptan--an oral dose-defining study. The Oral Sumatriptan Dose-Defining Study Group.

Three oral doses of sumatriptan, 100, 200 and 300 mg, given as dispersible tablets, were compared in the acute treatment of migraine in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 1,130 patients from 51 centres in eight countries. Patients treated up to three migraine attacks at home over a 3-month period and recorded the results on a diary card. Safety follow-ups were performed monthly at a clinic. All doses of sumatriptan were significantly (p less than 0.001) more effective than placebo at relieving headache within 2 h of treatment. Response rates, scored on a 4-point scale, were: placebo 27%; 100 mg sumatriptan 67%; 200 mg sumatriptan 73%; and 300 mg sumatriptan 67%. The proportion of patients who required rescue medication within 2 h of treatment was significantly (p less than 0.001) lower in all active treatment groups when compared with placebo. Response rates to sumatriptan were the same irrespective of the type of migraine (with or without aura) or the duration of symptoms prior to treatment (less than or equal to 4 or greater than 4 h). Sumatriptan also provided significant (p less than 0.001) relief from nausea and photophobia as compared with placebo. The majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity and were transient. The overall incidence of adverse events was dose-related, the percentage of patients reporting adverse events in the first attack treated being 36, 47 and 53% for 100-, 200- and 300-mg doses of sumatriptan, respectively, compared to 17% of placebo patients (p less than 0.001 for each treatment dose compared with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1991

Evaluation of a multiple-dose regimen of oral sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. The Oral Sumatriptan International Multiple-Dose Study Group.

In a multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study of oral sumatriptan (GR43175), given as a dispersible tablet, in the acute treatment of migraine, 149 patients were randomized to receive 100 mg sumatriptan and 84 to placebo. Each patient was provided with three tablets: one to be taken as soon as possible after headache onset; one to be taken 2 h later if the headache persisted and one to be taken if the headache recurred within 24 h. Patients recorded details of the attack and response to treatment on a diary card. Sumatriptan was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving headache (moderate/severe reduced to mild/none) at 2 h (50 vs. 19%; p less than 0.001) and at 4 h (75 vs. 30%; p less than 0.001). Of the sumatriptan group, 59% took the second dose compared with 80% of the placebo group (p less than 0.001). Compared with placebo, more patients on sumatriptan were pain-free by 2 h (26 vs. 5%; p less than 0.001) and by 4 h (48 vs. 13%; p less than 0.001). Headache improvement was apparent by 1 h in 42% of sumatriptan-treated patients and 17% of patients on placebo. Headache relief was significantly (p less than 0.001) better in patients taking sumatriptan, irrespective of the type of migraine (with or without aura), or the time the drug was taken (less than or more than 4 h after onset). There was no significant difference in the number of patients who took placebo or sumatriptan and whose headache recurred within 24 h of initial resolution (42 vs. 48%; p = 0.535).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Predicting the response to sumatriptan: the Sumatriptan Naratriptan Aggregate Patient Database.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerability profiles of sumatriptan and other 5HT(1B/1D) agonists (triptans) have been well established. However, the determinants for optimal response to sumatriptan are unknown. The Sumatriptan Naratriptan Aggregate Patient (SNAP) database contains data from 128 clinical trials including 28,407 migraine sufferers treating over 130,000 attacks. The authors analyzed these data to identify factors predicting response (headache relief and pain-free response) to sumatriptan. METHODS: The authors assessed 24 possible univariate predictors of headache response in 3,706 patients (18 years and older) receiving sumatriptan tablets 100 mg or placebo in a double-blind study using recursive partitioning and logistic regression techniques. RESULTS: The authors found seven predictors of headache relief 2 hours postdose. Moderate pain at baseline was the strongest predictor (adjusted p = 3.32 x 10(-35)), followed by absence of a disability requiring bedrest (adjusted p = 3.11 x 10(-18)). Other predictors included absence at baseline of vomiting, pulsating pain, nausea, or photophobia/phonophobia, and onset of headache during daytime hours. Logistic regression confirmed that treatment with sumatriptan was the strongest predictor of headache relief, with significant baseline covariates being pain severity, level of disability, and presence or absence of vomiting. A similar pattern of results was reported for predictors of pain-free response 2 hours after taking sumatriptan. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment pain severity is the most important predicting factor for response to sumatriptan in migraine attacks: the lower baseline severity, the better.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Clinical experience with oral sumatriptan: a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Oral Sumatriptan Dose-defining Study Group.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 100, 200 and 300 mg sumatriptan, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1-like receptor agonist, given in an oral dispersible form in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. A total of 1130 patients were recruited from 51 centres in eight countries and the efficacy results are presented from an interim analysis of 538 cases. Tolerability was evaluated in 227 patients. At 2 h, an improvement in headache severity from moderate or severe to mild or none was reported by 67% of patients who received 100 mg sumatriptan, 75% receiving 200 mg and 69% of patients receiving 300 mg sumatriptan, compared with 22% of patients who received placebo (P less than 0.001 all doses sumatriptan vs placebo). Adverse events were generally mild and transient, and appeared to be dose-related; the adverse event profile of 100 mg sumatriptan was similar to that of placebo. Overall, nausea/vomiting and "bitter taste" were the most common complaints. The proportion of patients withdrawn due to adverse events was similar in the placebo and 100 mg sumatriptan treatment groups (2% and 3%, respectively). It is concluded that 100 mg sumatriptan given orally is well tolerated with an anti-migraine efficacy comparable to that provided by the two higher doses.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

A double-blind placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of 50 mg sumatriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan Tablets S2CM07 Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Oral sumatriptan 50 mg has been found to have good efficacy and tolerability in the acute treatment of migraine but has been less well studied than the 100 mg dose. METHODS: This was a double-blind, parallel-group study (Glaxo Wellcome protocol number S2CM07) comparing the efficacy and safety of sumatriptan 50 mg tablets with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. Patients treated three migraine attacks with study medication; a second, optional dose was available for treating recurrent headache. Of the 560 patients randomized, 485 treated at least one attack, 411 at least two attacks, and 362 three attacks. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients who had obtained complete or almost complete headache relief at 4 h after dosing. RESULTS: For all attacks, a significantly greater proportion of patients experienced headache relief at 4 h with sumatriptan 50 mg tablets than with placebo (59% to 62% versus 32% to 42%; P = 0.005). The same was true at 3 h across all attacks, and at 2 h for attacks 1 and 2 (49% versus 23% and 45% versus 29%, respectively). Although sumatriptan and placebo were associated with similar incidences of recurrence, sumatriptan was associated with a longer time to recurrence. The incidence of adverse events with sumatriptan was similar to that with placebo, and there was no increase in adverse events associated with use of a second dose to treat recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Sumatriptan 50 mg tablets are well tolerated and efficacious in relieving migraine headache.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

Intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. International Intranasal Sumatriptan Study Group.

Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multicentre, multinational, parallel-group studies were carried out to identify the optimum dose of intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. Study medication was taken as a single dose through one nostril in the first study, and as a divided dose through two nostrils in the second study. Totals of 245 and 210 patients with a history of migraine were recruited into the one- and two-nostril studies, respectively. In both studies, headache severity had significantly improved at 120 min after doses of 10-40 mg sumatriptan compared to placebo (P < 0.05) and the greatest efficacy rates were obtained with 20 mg sumatriptan. With 20 mg sumatriptan 78% and 74% of patients experienced headache relief in one- and two-nostril studies respectively. Sumatriptan was generally well tolerated, the most frequently reported event being taste disturbance. The results of the two studies are similar and indicate that administering sumatriptan as a divided dose via two nostrils confers no significant advantage over single-nostril administration.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of menstrual migraine. The Sumatriptan Menstrual Migraine Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sumatriptan with placebo in the treatment of menstrual migraine. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sumatriptan in the treatment of menstrual migraine over two attacks. A total of 179 subjects received sumatriptan or placebo to treat at least one menstrual migraine attack. RESULTS: The efficacy results were consistent for attacks one and two. Two hours after treatment in attacks one and two, 53 (73%) and 51 (81%) of the sumatriptan-treated subjects, respectively, reported headache relief (reduction of a severe or moderately severe headache to a mild or no headache), compared with 27 (31%) and 18 (29%) of the placebo-treated subjects (P < .001). Within 24 hours of treatment in attack one, 28 (53%) and 14 (52%) of the initial responders to sumatriptan and placebo, respectively, experienced headache recurrence. The incidence and nature of adverse events in this study were similar to that seen in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous sumatriptan is an effective and well-tolerated acute treatment for menstrual migraine.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Self-treatment of acute migraine with subcutaneous sumatriptan using an auto-injector device. The Sumatriptan Auto-Injector Study Group.

The efficacy and safety of sumatriptan, a selective 5-HT1-like receptor agonist, were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational clinical trial of 235 patients suffering a moderate to severe migraine attack. Patients were randomized to treat a single migraine attack at home with 6 mg sumatriptan or placebo using an auto-injector. If the migraine had not improved at 1 h, patients had the option of taking a second identical injection. The primary measure of treatment efficacy was based on a comparison of the number of patients in the two treatment groups who had a reduction in headache severity from severe or moderate to mild or none at 1 and 2 h. At 1 h, 77% of patients treating with 6 mg sumatriptan compared to 26% treating with placebo (p less than 0.001) had mild headache or none. At 2 h, the response rates for all patients had risen to 83 and 30%, respectively. Of those patients requiring a second dose at 1 h, improvement to mild or no headache at 2 h was achieved in 61% of patients receiving sumatriptan compared to 15% of those receiving placebo. Other migraine symptoms were more effectively treated by sumatriptan and patients were able to return to work or normal activities earlier. Migraine recurrence within 48 h was a feature of 46% of attacks treated by patients with either treatment. Adverse events were more frequent using sumatriptan but were minor and transient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of subcutaneous sumatriptan with usual acute treatments for migraine. French Sumatriptan Study Group.

246 migraine patients (International Headache Society definition, 1-6 severe attacks per month) were randomised into a multicentre, cross-over study comparing subcutaneous (s.c.) sumatriptan 6 mg administered by an auto-injector (Glaxo device) with usual acute migraine treatments. Patients were treated for 2 months or up to 12 attacks, and then crossed over to the alternative treatment for the same duration. Usual treatments were: analgesics (including combinations), 49%; ergotamine, 24%; NSAIDs 19%; DHE, 7%. Rescue medication was allowed 2 h after the first dose. Headache was assessed on a 4-point self-rating scale (0: none, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe). Other migraine symptoms were assessed as present or absent. Quality of life was assessed before the study and at the end of each treatment period. Two hundred and seventeen patients were eligible for the cross-over analysis. At 2 h post-dosing, an average of 78% of attacks per patient were successfully relieved (grade 3 or 2 to 1 or 0) by s.c. sumatriptan, compared with 34% for the usual treatments (p < 0.001) and 63% of attacks per patient were completely relieved (grade 0) by s.c. sumatriptan compared with 15% for the usual treatments (p < 0.001). Sumatriptan-treated patients used rescue medication for 19% of their attacks, compared to 59% for comparator drugs (p = 0.001). Results for patient preference were: s.c. sumatriptan, 85%; usual treatments, 10%; no preference, 5% (p < 0.001). Sumatriptan was significantly superior to comparator drugs for all other efficacy end-points (p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗