Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8091069

Second-look laparotomy.

Abstract

The second-look laparotomy has become an important means of assessing therapy response in ovarian cancer patients. This procedure enables the gynecologic oncologist to diligently search for small volume persistent disease, which often escapes detection by less invasive means. Subsequent treatment, if required, may then be tailored to the initial biologic response to therapy. However, many patients with negative findings at second look will develop recurrent disease, dampening enthusiasm for the operation. Although controversial, this procedure remains the gold standard for the detection of disease status following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Moore, J F Barter. Second-look laparotomy.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ssu.2980100408

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Homoharringtonine and low-dose cytarabine in the management of late chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia.

PURPOSE: : To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a combination regimen of homoharringtonine (HHT) and low-dose cytarabine (ara-C) in patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) who had experienced treatment failure with interferon alfa (IFNalpha) therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred five patients were treated: 100 in chronic phase (15 with cytogenetic clonal evolution) and five in accelerated phase. Their median age was 52 years; all had been treated unsuccessfully with IFNalpha; 94% were in late chronic phase; 43% had been exposed to ara-C and 11% had been exposed to HHT. Patients received HHT 2.5 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion daily for 5 days and ara-C 15mg/m(2) daily in two subcutaneous injections for 5 days every 4 weeks. The outcome of the 100 patients in chronic phase was compared with a previous study group of 73 patients treated with HHT alone. RESULTS: Overall, the complete hematologic response (CHR) rate in chronic phase was 72%; the cytogenetic response rate was 32% (major response, 15%; complete response, 5%). Toxicities were acceptable, mostly related to moderate diarrhea (3%), headaches (3%), cardiovascular events (3%),and myelosuppression-associated complications (3% to 14%). With a median follow-up period of 25 months, the estimated 4-year survival rate was 55%. Response rates were identical with HHT plus ara-C versus HHT alone, but the survival was significantly longer with the combination after accounting for differences in the study groups and by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The combination regimen of HHT and ara-C is effective and safe in patients with CML who have experienced treatment failure with IFNalpha and needs to be investigated together with IFNalpha as part of front-line CML therapy. The addition of ara-C did not improve the response rates but may have improved survival, perhaps through suppression of clones related to disease transformation.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗