Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reoperation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Reoperative coronary surgery. Comparative analysis of 6591 patients undergoing primary bypass and 508 patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass.

During an 18-year period a consecutive series of 6591 patients underwent primary coronary bypass grafting and 508 patients underwent reoperative bypass. The mean patient age for the reoperative group was identical to that of the primary group, 59.8 years, but the mean age at initial operation for the reoperative group was 55.2 years. Mammary grafts were done at initial operation in 59% of patients who have had one operation versus only 46% of patients who subsequently required reoperation (p less than 0.001). The overall operative mortality rate was 2.0% (134/6591) for primary coronary bypass versus 6.9% (35/508) for reoperations (p less than 0.001). Patients with a reoperative interval of 1 to 10 years had a 6.0% (18/312) mortality rate, compared with 17.6% (13/74) for those in whom the interval between operations was greater than 10 years (p less than 0.01). Ventricular arrhythmias, excessive bleeding, prolonged ventilatory support, intraaortic balloon pump insertion (all p less than 0.05), and perioperative myocardial infarction (p less than 0.001) were all more prevalent after reoperations. Including perioperative mortality, the actuarial survival rate at 5 years was 80% for reoperations versus 90% for primary operations. The corresponding figures at 10 years were 65% and 75%. The probability of undergoing reoperation within 5 and 10 years was 0.034 +/- 0.003 and 0.055 +/- 0.005, respectively. Ten years postoperatively, 36% of patients having the initial operation had recurrent angina whereas 58% of the reoperative group had significant recurrent angina. Ten years after reoperation, 30% of operative survivors were free of heart-related morbidity and mortality compared with 50% of patients having a primary operation. Univariate analysis of factors increasing the probability of reoperation include the absence of a mammary graft and younger age at operation. Patients undergoing a second bypass operation represent a substantially higher risk subgroup than patients undergoing initial operation in terms of perioperative morbidity, mortality, decreased long-term survival, and decreased relief of recurrent cardiac morbidity.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2001

Eight year outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a comparison of reoperated and not reoperated patients.

A retrospective study of 211 patients with unilateral sciatica operated on for lumbar disc herniation during 1988 and 1989 was performed in order to compare the results of reoperated patients with the results of patients operated on only once. The patients completed a standardized questionnaire in 1997 which included questions about reoperations, back and leg pain, functional status and disability pension. Outcome scores were calculated, giving values from 0 (no pain/normal function) to 100 (totally disabled). A follow-up status of 80.1% was obtained; 163 patients answered the questionnaire while six patients had died. 23.9% of the patients (n = 39) had been reoperated on. A recurrent disc herniation at the same level was suspected before the reoperation in 18.4%, but a recurrence was found in only 8.6%. 3.7% were reoperated on more than once. Outcome score was worse among "reoperated" patients (median 45.0, range 0-94) than among patients who only had the primary operation (median 10.5, range 0-81) (P < 0.001). In addition, 34.3% of the "reoperated" patients received a disability pension compared to 9.9% of the patients not reoperated on (P < 0.01). Patients reoperated upon at the same level without peroperative signs of recurrent disc herniation, had an outcome score of 53.0 (range 0-82) compared to a score of 30.0 (range 0-66) in patients with a confirmed recurrence (P < 0.05). The percentage of disability pension was 53.8% versus 9.1%, respectively, for those two groups (P < 0.05). Eight years after operation for lumbar disc herniation, the outcome was significantly worse in "reoperated" patients than in patients operated on once. In addition, reoperated patients with peroperatively confirmed recurrence of the same disc, seemed to have a better outcome than patients without peroperative signs of a recurrence.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Reoperative myocardial revascularization: an analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations.

A consecutive series of 2645 patients underwent primary coronary bypass grafting while 458 patients underwent reoperative bypass during a 9-year period. The mean age (61 years), sex distribution (83% men) and preoperative risk factors were identical in the two groups. Significantly more patients belonged to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 4 and were clinically unstable in the reoperative group (P < 0.001). The internal mammary artery was used in 43% of the single operation group but in only 23% of patients who subsequently required reoperation (P < 0.001). In reoperations 61% of the patients had an internal mammary artery graft (P < 0.001). The overall operative mortality rate for single operation was 2.3% (62/2645) versus 9.2% (42/458) for reoperations. Patients with a reoperative interval of more than 1 year had a 8.4% mortality rate, compared with 28% in those reoperated on 1 year or less after the initial operation (P < 0.01). Preoperative myocardial infarction, intra-aortic balloon pump insertion, prolonged ventilatory support and ventricular arrhythmias were all prevalent after reoperations (all P > 0.001), while postoperative myocardial infarctions and re-sternotomy for bleeding did not differ between the groups. Emergency operation, preoperative NYHA class 3-4 and poor left ventricular function were predictors of perioperative mortality in both groups. Left main stem stenosis was an added factor in the reoperative group. After reoperation 93% of the hospital survivors were alive at 5 years after surgery; the cardiac event-free rate was 59% and > 90% of the patients showed improvement of their NYHA class during the follow-up. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting is effective, but has an increased operative mortality and morbidity, especially in patients with unstable angina, left main stem stenosis and poor preoperative left ventricular function.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses: predictors for emergency surgery and reoperative mortality.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term outcome of patients with aortic bioprosthetic valves could be improved by decreasing the reoperative mortality rate. METHODS: Predictors of emergency reoperation and reoperative mortality were identified retrospectively in 172 patients who had the first bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between 1975 and 1988 (mean age 46+/-13 years) and were subjected to replacement of the degenerated bioprostheses between 1978 and 1997 (mean age 56+/-14 years). Emergency reoperation had to be performed in 31 patients (18%). RESULTS: The operative mortality was 5.2% (9/172), 22.6% for emergency (odds ratio 11.17; 95%-confidence limit 4.33-28.85) and 1.4% for elective replacement of the degenerated aortic bioprosthesis (P<0.0001; OR=20.3). Patients who died at reoperation had higher transvalvular gradients before the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0.007), received smaller bioprostheses at the first operation (P=0.03), had later recurrence of symptoms after the first aortic valve replacement (P=0.04), a higher pre-reoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (P=0.02), and a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (P=0.001) and pulmonary artery hypertension (P=0.009). Endocarditis before the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0.004), postoperative pneumonia at the first operation (P=0.005), pulmonary hypertension (P=0.0004) acquired during the interval, later recurrence of symptoms (P=0.04) after the first operation, a lower ejection fraction at the time of reoperation (P=0.03) and acute onset of bioprosthetic regurgitation (P=0.00002) were predictors for emergency surgery. Higher transvalvular gradients at the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0. 006), coronary artery disease (P=0.003) acquired during the interval, the need for concomitant coronary artery revascularization (P=0. 001), sex (P=0.02) and size (P=0.05) and type of the bioprostheses used (P=0.007) were incremental predictors for reoperative mortality which were independent of emergency surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Elective replacement of failed aortic bioprostheses is safe. Patients undergoing emergency reoperation have a considerably higher mortality. They can be identified by a history of native aortic valve endocarditis, higher transvalvular gradients at primary aortic valve replacement, smaller bioprostheses, and pulmonary hypertension or coronary artery disease acquired during the interval. A failing bioprosthesis must be replaced at its first sign of dysfunction.

Aortic Valve↗
PubMed2002

Reoperation for coronary artery disease: devised management for reoperation including digital subtraction angiography.

Between December 1990 and August 1999, a consecutive series of 494 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, while 19 (3.8%) patients underwent isolated reoperative coronary bypass grafting. The mean age of 16 males and 3 females who underwent reoperation was 63.4 +/- 6.4 years. The mean interval from the initial operation to reoperation was 50.7 +/- 61.0 months (range 3 days to 16 years). There were neither operative nor in-hospital deaths. Postoperative graft patency was 96.9% in all the bypass grafts and 96.7% in the arterial grafts. Despite the small number of reoperations, the outcomes were favorable due to our devised management: the patients who had received coronary artery bypass grafting underwent intra-aortic digital subtraction angiography 7 days postoperatively to evaluate the early graft patency, which subsequently avoided reoperation 1 to 3 months after the initial operation when the pericardial adhesion was tight; in the primary operation, internal thoracic artery grafts were covered with thymus, and the pericardium was closed for an easy sternal re-entry; and in the reoperation, stenotic grafts were dissected and ligated after aortic cross-clamping, all sides of the heart were dissected to obtain a good operative field and to prepare for any cardiac accident, arterial grafts were used to avoid re-reoperation, and aprotinin was useful in reducing perioperative bleeding. The present findings suggest that intra-aortic digital subtraction angiography, appropriate preparation for follow-up surgery at the primary operation, and complete revascularization using arterial grafts at reoperation appear to have contributed to the satisfactory outcome in coronary reoperation.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Valvular heart disease. A comparative study of results after primary operation, reoperation, and after multiple reoperation.

Reoperation for valvular heart disease has been associated with a higher operative mortality than primary operations, especially in patients who had multiple prior operations. We have analyzed the 226 consecutive patients who underwent valve replacement. These involved 163 primary operations, 52 first reoperation, and 11 second/third reoperations. Preoperative left ventricular dysfunction was more severe, and operation time and cardiopulmonary bypass time were significantly greater according to the number of operations, associated with a greater amount of intraoperative blood loss. The operative mortality after a second/third reoperation was 27.3%, which was significantly higher than that after primary operation (6.7%) (p < 0.05), and that after first reoperation (5.8%) (p < 0.05). Seven (64%) patients who underwent a second/third reoperation had poor preoperative left ventricular function (%FS < 25%), and 5 (71%) of these required postoperative mechanical supports, and 3 (60%) of the 5 patients died of low output syndrome. We have found that poor preoperative left ventricular function and the duration on cardiopulmonary bypass, but not the number of reoperation were correlated with operative mortality. Continued efforts should be directed to decrease the mortality for multiple reoperative valve surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations.

OBJECTIVE: We noted an increasing risk profile of patients undergoing reoperative coronary surgery. We evaluated the risk compared with primary procedures, our results over a 16-year span, and the predictors of hospital outcomes after redo surgery. METHODS: We analyzed 20,614 patients undergoing isolated coronary surgery at our institution from 1982 to 1997. Of these, 1230 (6.0%) were undergoing reoperation. Independent predictors of outcomes were identified by multivariable regression. RESULTS: The prevalence of reoperation peaked in 1994 at 8.2%. Patients undergoing reoperation were more likely to be male, to have left ventricular dysfunction and worse symptoms, and to require an urgent operation than patients undergoing a primary operation (P <.0001). Perioperative myocardial infarctions (3.7% vs 7.4%), low-output syndrome (9.0% vs 24.0%), and death (2.4% vs 6.8%) were more common in patients undergoing reoperation (all P <.0001). Over the years, the risk profile of patients undergoing reoperation increased. Age, left ventricular dysfunction, severity of symptoms, extent of coronary artery disease, left main stenosis, and requirement for urgent or emergency operations increased with time (P <.05). However, mortality, myocardial infarction, and low-output syndrome have remained constant. The independent predictors of mortality after reoperative surgery were increased age, greater Canadian Cardiovascular Society symptom class, earlier year of operation, and greater left ventricular dysfunction. After 1990, analysis of an expanded data set also identified peripheral vascular disease and failure to use retrograde cardioplegia as predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Improving results of reoperative surgery have been offset by an increasing patient risk profile. Meticulous operative technique and retrograde cardioplegia may permit good results in these high-risk patients.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗
PubMed1999

Transsphenoidal reoperations for removal of pituitary adenomas: rhinological management and timing of reoperation.

Transsphenoidal reoperation of pituitary adenomas remain a difficult surgical procedure even with skilful microsurgical techniques. This paper retrospectively analysed how to overcome such difficult factors as absent normal surgical landmarks and an adhesive field. For residual or recurrent adenomas, transsphenoidal reoperations were carried out 14 times in 12 patients. Reasons for reoperations were intentionally multistaged operations in 10 cases, regrowth in three and apoplexy in one. In the first operation, we tried to preserve or restore as many anatomic landmarks as possible. Overly aggressive procedures causing cerebrospinal fluid leakage were avoided. In the three second reoperations within 3 months, a transnasal approach was used. In the other eight situations, between 4 and 119 months, transnasal approach in five, and transseptal approach in three, were used retrospectively. In two patients with fibrous adenomas, reoperations were carried out 4 and 12 months after the first. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation is essential to confirm the tumour descent toward or into pituitary fossa. Timing of the reoperation needs to be individualized depending on MRI findings. Trauma to the nasal mucosa and a narrower operative field became more frequent in reoperations 4 months or later. To obtain a surgical field wide enough to manipulate an ultrasonic aspirator for fibrous adenomas, removal of bony structures at the nasal cavity on the surgical corridor is useful. These rhinological preparations in the first and subsequent operations along with a selection of timing of reoperation are important to gain easier access for tumour removal and in avoidance of surgical complications. Copyright 1999 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1994

Experience and early results of second reoperations for coronary artery disease. Should patent vein grafts be replaced during reoperation?

Reoperation for coronary artery disease has become a routine procedure; however, a second reoperation is exceptional. In this report we describe our experience with 16 patients undergoing a second reoperation for coronary atherosclerosis. The absence of operative mortality is certainly related to the patient selection. The number of patients is still too small to draw major conclusions. Striking, however, is that the first reoperation was usually done for angina because of progression of atherosclerosis in the native coronary system and the second reoperation was done because of graft failure. This experience supports the idea that the replacement of old, even patent, venous grafts and the choice of the best available conduits are of great importance at the first reoperation and may prevent a second reoperation.

Coronary Angiography↗
PubMed2000

Coronary reoperations: indications, techniques and operative results. Retrospective study of 240 coronary reoperations.

BACKGROUND: We review twelve-year experience with coronary reoperations so as to better identify indications, techniques and results. METHODS: Between January 1986 and March 1998, 240 coronary reoperations (228 redux, 12 tridux) were performed. There were 223 male and 17 female patients, with a mean age of 63.6+/-7.9 years at the time of reoperation. Mean time interval between operations was 10+/-4.8 years. Symptomatology consisted of: stable recurrent angina (40%), unstable (57%), or congestive heart failure (3%). Pathological feature of the primary grafts was implicated in 95% of cases and atheroma sole progression over native network in 5% of cases. During reoperations 521 (2.2+/-0.8/patient) bypass [venous (40%), arterial (60%)] were performed as well as 15 associated procedures. RESULTS: Operative mortality represented 10% (n=24). Causes of death included infarct (7), left ventricular failure (12), rhythm disorders (2), mediastinitis (1) and multiorgan failure (2). Mortality risk factors were operation date (16.6% before 1992 and 7.4% after, p=0.03), age (13.1% after 60 years old, 2.7% before, p=0.01) time interval between intervention (12% after 8 years, 4% before, p=0.05) and anterograde cardioplegia only (11.8% versus 4.5% when a combined anterograde and retrograde access was used, p=0.06). Morbidity was 31% (71/240). Among the survivors 169 patients (78%) did not experience any complication. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to a better medico-surgical management, the mortality rate of coronary reoperations is steadily decreasing.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

[Reoperation for transposition of the great arteries: mid-term results and reoperation after arterial switch operation].

The arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries is now widely accepted as the therapeutic method of choice. As of December 1993, a total of 162 patients underwent the arterial switch. There were 100 patients with transposition and intact ventricular septum, 48 with a ventricular septal defect, 14 with ventricular septal defect and arch anomalies (coarctation: 11, interruption: 3). Early and late mortality were 3.7% (6 patients) and 4.5% (7 patients), respectively. Postoperative pulmonary stenosis (> 30 mmHg) was noted in 33 patients (22%), aortic regurgitation (> mild) in 20 (13%), supravalvular aortic stenosis (> 20 mmHg) in 5 (3%) and mitral regurgitation (> mild) in 5 (3%). Reoperation was performed in 27 patients with no mortality. Mean interval between the switch and the reoperation was 30 months. Twenty-three patients with pulmonary stenosis underwent patch plasty of pulmonary artery. Two children with severe aortic regurgitation underwent aortic valve replacement. Two patients who had undergone one-staged repair for interruption complex were reoperated due to supravalvular aortic stenosis and pulmonary stenosis. Actuarial survival and freedom from reoperation at 9 years were 90% and 69%, respectively.

Aortic Valve Stenosis↗
PubMed1998

[Coronary reoperation: indications, methods and immediate postoperative prognosis. Retrospective study of 184 reoperations].

The authors performed 184 coronary reoperations (172 redux, 12 tridux) between January 1986 and december 1995 in 177 patients (165 men, 12 women) with an average age at surgery of 62.9 +/- 7.6 years. The average interval between the surgical procedures was 9.5 +/- 4.5 years. The symptoms were recurrent angina, stable in 44%, unstable in 51%, and cardiac failure, 7%. Graft dysfunction was the cause in 94.5% of cases with progression of atheroma of the native coronary vessels in only 5.6% of cases. At reoperation 389 bypass procedures were performed (venous 39.5%, arterial 60.5%) (2.1 +/- 0.6 per patient) with 10 associated procedures (3 mitral valvuloplasties, 2 left ventricular aneurysmectomy, 3 aortic valve replacements, 1 replacement of the ascending aorta, 1 carotid endarteriectomy). The operative mortality was 10.9%. The causes of the 20 deaths were myocardial infarction (7), left ventricular failure (8), arrhythmias (2), mediastinitis (1) and multi-organ failure (2). The risk factors for death were: the date of surgery (19% before 1991 and 8% after: p = 0.03), age (18% after 60 years, 2% before: p = 0.015), the interval between the surgical procedures (33% after 15 years, p = 0.02), anterograde cardioplegic injection alone (15% versus 4.5% when mixed antero and retrograde perfusion was used: p = 0.02). The morbidity was 28% (52/184 patients); 132 patients (72%) had uncomplicated postoperative courses. The incidence of repeat coronary artery surgery is in constant progression. Improved medico-surgical management should continue to reduce the mortality which is still high.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Reoperation in biological and mechanical valve populations: fate of the reoperative patient.

From 1975 through 1992 inclusive, reoperative valve replacement (REOP) was required by 12.9% of patients (708/5,499). Of 1,355 patients with mechanical prostheses (MP), 46 (3.4%) came to REOP versus 662 of 4,144 patients (16%) with biological prostheses (BP). Early REOP mortality rate was 17.4% (8/46) for MP and 10.6% (70/662) for BP (p = not significant). It was higher with age greater than 75 years (p < 0.05) and trended higher with concomitant procedures and with increasing number of REOPs (p = not significant). The percentage freedom from REOP at 5 and 10 years for all BP was 96.0% +/- 0.4% and 74.9% +/- 1.1% compared with 93.6% +/- 1.2% and 87.9% +/- 2.5% for MP. The most common cause of REOP in the BP patients was structural valve deterioration, which was uncommon in patients with MP (72% versus 2% of REOP but only 15% versus 0.1% of initial implants). Nonstructural dysfunction was the leading cause of REOP in the MP group (65% versus 11%). Prosthetic valve endocarditis (18% versus 10%) and thromboembolic complications (10% versus 1%) were also more frequent causes of REOP in MP patients. However, the increased relative role of these factors with MP is due to the minimal incidence of structural valve deterioration. When related to the original choice of MP versus BP, only thromboembolic complication (3.8 times) was more prevalent as a cause of REOP in patients receiving MP at their previous procedure (p = not significant). For patients who previously received BP, structural valve deterioration (69 times) was more likely to lead to REOP than with MP (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1992

[Reoperations for failure of gastroesophageal reflux surgery. Apropos of fifty reoperations].

Fifty patients were reoperated for failed antireflux procedures or post-fundoplication symptoms. Cases of severe esophagitis, that is stenosis or Barrett's esophagus, were excluded. The usual cause of failure was a technical error. All of the operations, a new fundoplication in 35 cases and a total duodenal diversion in 15 cases, were performed via an abdominal incision. Operative mortality was nil. After a 42 months follow-up, according to the patient, the clinical results were good or excellent in 93% of the cases. The objective results-fibroscopy, pHmanometry, X-Ray were normal in 86%.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Selection of valve prosthesis, reoperation and late result--surgical technique of reoperation with Björk-Shiley prosthesis].

Late result of Björk-Shiley prosthesis selected in the aortic and mitral position for valve replacement was reviewed on 222 cases in our 10 years clinical experience. Late survival was 93.8% (5 yrs), 83% (10 yrs) in the aortic position, 94% (5 yrs) and 80% (10 yrs) in the mitral position. Valve-related complication by Björk-Shiley prosthesis was very low in incidence as compared with that published by other institution with respects to thromboembolism, prosthetic valve endocarditis, reoperation, anticoagulation-related bleeding. Inflammatory aortic valve disease which developed valve detachment in the aortic position with Björk-Shiley valve was treated with double-suture technique in the aortic annulus and fixation of the graft with the inside of sinus of Valsalva, en-bloc reconstruction with composite graft using Björk-Shiley valve inside of the sinus Valsalva without touch to coronary ostium. The other surgical procedure was translocation method using Björk-Shiley prosthesis. Our clinical results suggest that Björk-Shiley prosthesis is still recommended in the aortic and mitral positions from low incidence of valve-related complication and good late survival.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Reoperative parathyroid surgery. 350 cervicotomies. 11 reoperations. Remarks].

One or more repeat operations were necessary to obtain full recovery in 11 out of 350 patients receiving surgery for hyperparathyroidism. Analysis of factors, sometimes multiple, leading to failure showed: poor surgical technique (3 cases), typical (2 cases) or rare (3 cases) ectopias, a supernumerary gland (2 cases), or lack of recognition of hyperplasia of the total parathyroid system (3 cases). Indications for and tactical modalities of reoperation are discussed, and emphasis placed on the unreliability of techniques employed pre-operatively to locate the diseased gland, the very rare need for sternotomy (1 case), and the remarkable possibilities of parathyroid autografts (4 cases). (4 cases).

Female↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reoperation after Heller's operation for achalasia and other motility disorders of the esophagus: a study of eighty-one reoperations.

Most failures or pseudo-failures of Heller's operation are due to an imperfect surgical technique. The procedure should include the entire muscular layer, extend as far upwards as possible and at least two to three cm downwards onto the stomach. Furthermore, it should be associated with an anti-reflux procedure. Eighty-one operations were performed in 70 patients who had previously undergone Heller's operation. Of the 42 patients presenting with recurrent achalasia, 21 had an insufficient Heller procedure upwards, 10 downwards and 11 in depth. Twenty-three patients had peptic esophagitis and three had periesophageal sclerosis. The management of these 70 reoperated patients included 36 iterative esophageal myotomies, 32 resections, four total duodenal diversions and two hiatal reconstructions. Repeated cardiomyotomies gave excellent results in 75% of cases and esophagogastric resection in 79%.

Esophageal Achalasia↗