Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8053842

Certificates.

F Fry
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Concise Oxford English Dictionary defines 'dilemma' as "an argument forcing one to choose one of two alternatives both unfavourable to him (or her)". This is situation that frequently confronts the general practitioner. In this article a personal solution to the problem of 'certificates' is presented. Not every one will necessarily agree with the solutions presented and some may find them unacceptable, or have better solutions. The author warmly welcomes correspondence, either personal, or in the form of Letters to the Editor, as this is a subject in which consensus decisions are important.

Explore related subjects

AbsenteeismAustraliaConfidentialityDisability EvaluationFamily PracticeHumansInformed ConsentWorkplaceHealth Care and Public HealthJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Fry. 1994. Certificates.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8053842/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Management of school leavers given a diphtheria and tetanus vaccine intended for children instead of the intended low dose preparation.

In November 1995, 102 school leavers in two North Staffordshire schools were given high dose diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (intended for primary immunisation of children) rather than a preparation with a low dose of diphtheria vaccine intended for adults and adolescents. We describe the management of the incident and the action taken to minimise the risk of such an error being made again. Pupils who had received the high dose vaccine and a control group were surveyed with a self-administered questionnaire. Thirteen children out of 67 given the higher dose diphtheria vaccine consulted their general practitioner and the same number had time off school, compared with none of 25 from a control school. This excess morbidity was probably attributable to the higher dose of diphtheria vaccine.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1997

Prospective cohort study of predictors of incident low back pain in nurses.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of handling patients and indicators of individual susceptibility on risk of low back pain in nurses. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with follow up by repeated self administered every three months over two years. SETTING: NHS university hospital trust. SUBJECTS: 961 female nurses who had been free from low back pain for at least one month at the time of completing a baseline questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of new low back pain during follow up and of pain leading to absence from work. RESULTS: Of 838 women who provided data suitable for analysis, 322 (38%) developed low back pain during follow up (mean 18.6 months), including 93 (11%) whose pain led to absence from work. The strongest predictor of new low back pain was earlier history of the symptom, and risk was particularly high if previous pain had lasted for over a month in total and had occurred within the 12 months before entry to the study (incidence during follow up 66%). Frequent low mood at baseline was strongly associated with subsequent absence from work for back pain (odds ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 8.2). After adjustment for earlier history of back pain and other potential confounders, risk was higher in nurses who reported frequent manual transfer of patients between bed and chair, manual repositioning of patients on the bed, and lifting patients in or out of the bath with a hoist. CONCLUSIONS: Of the indicators of individual susceptibility that were examined, only history of back trouble was sufficiently predictive to justify selective exclusion of some applicants for nursing posts. The main route to prevention of back disorders among nurses is likely to lie in improved ergonomics.

Absenteeism↗