Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7930258

Sinus node function after cardiac transplantation.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine changes over time in sinus mode function after cardiac transplantation; to determine the incidence, natural history and etiology of sinus node dysfunction in transplant recipients; and to identify any early predictors of long-term sinus node function. BACKGROUND: Bradyarrhythmias caused by sinus node dysfunction are common immediately after cardiac transplantation. Existing electrophysiologic studies have been limited by small numbers and have reported an unexpectedly high incidence of sinus node dysfunction (approximately 50%) compared with the incidence of bradyarrhythmias in other studies. There have been no previous studies reporting serial electrophysiologic data. Thus, the natural history of sinus node dysfunction after transplantation has not been adequately described. METHODS: Serial electrophysiologic studies of sinus node function and 24-h ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings were performed at 1, 2, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after transplantation in 40 adult recipients. RESULTS: The overall incidence of sinus node dysfunction was 17.5% (7 of 40). Six patients (15%) had sinus node dysfunction from week 1; one developed sinus node dysfunction at 3 months. Sinus node recovery time returned to normal by 6 weeks in all six patients with early sinus node dysfunction, but abnormalities of sinoatrial conduction persisted in two. Two patients who required pacing during ambulatory monitoring at 2 weeks after transplantation (temporary pacemaker 50 beats/min, demand) received a permanent pacemaker. One patient required pacing at 3 weeks and continued to require pacing 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of sinus node dysfunction after cardiac transplantation is lower than has been previously reported in electrophysiologic studies. Sinus node automaticity improves with time, although abnormalities of sinoatrial conduction may persist. The best predictor of permanent pacing requirements is the temporary pacing requirements during 24-h Holter monitoring 2 and 3 weeks after transplantation, with temporary pacing set at 50 beats/min on demand.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C D Scott, J H Dark, J M McComb. 1994-11-01. Sinus node function after cardiac transplantation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90117-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Decrease in pacemaker incidence after orthotopic heart transplantation.

A decrease in sinus node dysfunction and pacemaker requirement after orthotopic heart transplantation was observed over a 6.5-year period, probably indicating the effect of a learning curve. Indirect evidence suggests a traumatic genesis of sinus node dysfunction after cardiac transplantation.

Arrhythmia, Sinus

Bradycardia after heart transplantation: reversal with theophylline.

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to demonstrate that theophylline, an adenosine receptor antagonist, can reverse bradyarrhythmias after orthotopic heart transplantation. BACKGROUND: Sinus node dysfunction, primarily sinus bradycardia, frequently occurs after orthotopic heart transplantation and may lead to permanent pacemaker implantation. Endogenous adenosine has been implicated as a cause of such posttransplantation bradyarrhythmia. METHODS: Twenty-nine transplant recipients (group 1) were given theophylline after bradyarrhythmias developed after transplantation. Data in these patients were compared with those in a control group of 18 patients without bradyarrhythmias (group 2) who were not given theophylline. RESULTS: The mean heart rate in group 1 increased from 62 +/- 7 to 89 +/- 10 beats/min after administration of theophylline (p < 0.0001); the mean heart rate in group 2 was 88 +/- 12 beats/min. Patients in group 1 required more days of temporary atrial pacing (3.5 +/- 1 vs. 1.5 +/- 3, p < 0.04) before the administration of theophylline than did patients in group 2. The length of hospital stay after transplantation did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 2 (17 +/- 7.5 vs. 20 +/- 16 days, p = NS). Age, gender, underlying disease, preoperative use of amiodarone, graft ischemia time or the incidence of moderate to severe rejection were not different between patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of theophylline for posttransplantation bradyarrhythmias increased heart rate and facilitated the withdrawal of chronotropic support. We conclude that theophylline offers effective and specific therapy for heart transplant patients with early bradyarrhythmias, reducing the need for implantation of a permanent pacemaker.

Arrhythmia, Sinus

Permanent pacemaker lead implantation via the transhepatic route.

A 4-year-old male with transposition of the great arteries, status post-Senning repair, required placement of an atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction and atrial flutter. Multiple systemic venous occlusions precluded conventional transvenous lead implantation. A transhepatic approach resulted in successful placement of an endocardial atrial pacing lead.

Arrhythmia, Sinus