Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7922660

Microlevel documentation: relational database for critical path development.

Abstract

There have been great strides in developing hospital information systems (HISs); however, there are few if any systems that are fully integrated to allow nursing documentation at microlevel data--that is, information about interventions between a nurse or other health care disciplines and the patient. It consists of the data used by a nurse in taking care of patients at the intervention level. This article suggests a process for developing a fully integrated HIS that will build a nursing minimum data set (NMDS) to aid in case management systems development, costing-out services, and nursing research. The goal of the system is to decrease the amount of paperwork, allowing the nurse to spend more time with the patient, and at the same time improving the quality of documentation and improving patient outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Greiner. 1994. Microlevel documentation: relational database for critical path development.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7922660/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost per delivery using two different initial approaches to the treatment of postvasectomy infertility. DESIGN: Model of expected costs and results in the United States in 1994. SETTING: Men with postvasectomy infertility, evaluated and treated at centers with experience in vasectomy reversal or sperm retrieval and ICSI. PATIENT(S): Men with postvasectomy infertility, with a female partner < or = 39 years of age. INTERVENTION(S): Initial microsurgical vasectomy reversal was compared with retrieved epididymal or testicular sperm. Actual treatment charges, complication rates, and pregnancy and delivery rates obtained in the United States were used for cost per delivery analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cost per delivery, delivery rates. RESULT(S): Cost per delivery with an initial approach of vasectomy reversal was only $25,475. (95% confidence interval $19,609 to $31,339), with a delivery rate of 47%. However, the cost per delivery after sperm retrieval and ICSI was $72,521. (95% confidence interval $63,357 to $81,685), with an average of $73,146 for percutaneous or testicular sperm retrieval and $71,896 for surgical epididymal sperm retrieval. The delivery rate after one cycle of sperm retrieval and ICSI was 33%. CONCLUSION(S): The most cost-effective approach to treatment of postvasectomy infertility is microsurgical vasectomy reversal. This treatment also has the highest chance of resulting in delivery of a child for a single intervention.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of assisted reproduction using in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as a primary treatment for varicocele-associated infertility. METHODS: Analysis of cost per delivery using published and contemporary results for treatment with ICSI in the United States for male factor infertility was compared with cost per delivery after surgical varicocelectomy. Only results from controlled trials of varicocelectomy were used for evaluation of pregnancy and delivery rates. Cost estimates were based on prevailing nationwide charges for services in 1994. RESULTS: The cost per delivery with ICSI was found to be $89,091 (95% confidence interval $78,720 to $99,462), whereas the cost per delivery after varicocelectomy was only $26,268 (95% confidence interval $19,138 to $44,656). Assuming the highest possible published success rate for ICSI resulted in a cost estimate as low as $62,263. The average published U.S. delivery rate after one attempt of ICSI was only 28%. whereas a 30% delivery rate was obtained after varicocelectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Specific treatment of varicocele-associated male factor infertility with surgical varicocelectomy is more cost-effective than primary treatment with assisted reproduction. Continued evaluation and treatment of the man with infertility is warranted. Despite the apparent success of ICSI for the most severe cases of male factor infertility, application of assisted reproduction for all cases of male factor infertility also does not necessarily provide as high a delivery rate as specific treatment of the cause of male factor infertility.

Cost-Benefit Analysis