Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7782082

Efficient pooling designs for library screening.

Abstract

We describe efficient methods for screening clone libraries, based on pooling schemes that we call "random k-sets designs." In these designs, the pools in which any clone occurs are equally likely to be any possible selection of k from the v pools. The values of k and v can be chosen to optimize desirable properties. Random k-sets designs have substantial advantages over alternative pooling schemes: they are efficient, flexible, and easy to specify, require fewer pools, and have error-correcting and error-detecting capabilities. In addition, screening can often be achieved in only one pass, thus facilitating automation. For design comparison, we assume a binomial distribution for the number of "positive" clones, with parameters n, the number of clones, and c, the coverage. We propose the expected number of resolved positive clones--clones that are definitely positive based upon the pool assays--as a criterion for the efficiency of a pooling design. We determine the value of k that is optimal, with respect to this criterion, as a function of v, n, and c. We also describe superior k-sets designs called k-sets packing designs. As an illustration, we discuss a robotically implemented design for a 2.5-fold-coverage, human chromosome 16 YAC library of n = 1298 clones. We also estimate the probability that each clone is positive, given the pool-assay data and a model for experimental errors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W J Bruno, E Knill, D J Balding, D C Bruce, N A Doggett, W W Sawhill, R L Stallings, C C Whittaker, D C Torney. 1995-03-01. Efficient pooling designs for library screening.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-7543(95)80078-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Some results on combinations of two binary screening tests.

When two medical screening tests for a disease exist, it may be appealing to combine them to increase screening accuracy. Combination of two valid screening tests, where each independently has screening performance, can increase the overall disease screening performance. Some results are obtained when two binary screening tests are combined according to the Boolean Any+ strategy, as defined by Maguire (1). These results are useful and provide investigators of two screening tests a sense of what to expect of the performance of the two tests when combined. This then may be followed by a clinical trial that directly demonstrates the benefit of the combined test.

Binomial Distribution

Noninferiority testing in crossover trials with correlated binary outcomes and small event proportions with applications to the analysis of condom failure data.

Regulatory agencies may require demonstrating a new therapy or device as noninferior to an existing method. For example, a new condom type must demonstrate noninferiority to existing latex condoms before consideration as an equivalent method of pregnancy prevention. Studies designed to assess condom effectiveness typically measure experimental and standard condom failure in a crossover trial, resulting in unbalanced correlated binary outcomes with low event proportions. We used simulations to evaluate the test size of a simple population average approach to noninferiority testing with the small event proportions, intracluster correlations, and sample sizes frequently found in condom studies. Results emphasize the importance of considering test accuracy when designing any study.

Binomial Distribution

Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data.

Existing methods for setting confidence intervals for the difference theta between binomial proportions based on paired data perform inadequately. The asymptotic method can produce limits outside the range of validity. The 'exact' conditional method can yield an interval which is effectively only one-sided. Both these methods also have poor coverage properties. Better methods are described, based on the profile likelihood obtained by conditionally maximizing the proportion of discordant pairs. A refinement (methods 5 and 6) which aligns 1-alpha with an aggregate of tail areas produces appropriate coverage properties. A computationally simpler method based on the score interval for the single proportion also performs well (method 10).

Binomial Distribution