Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

E Knill

Publications and source records attributed to E Knill.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Interpretation of pooling experiments using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method.

This paper describes an effective method for extracting as much information as possible from pooling experiments for library screening. Pools are collections of clones, and screening a pool with a probe determines whether any of these clones are positive for the probe. The results of the pool screenings are interpreted, or decoded, to infer which clones are candidates to be positive. These candidate positives are subjected to confirmatory testing. Decoding the pool screening results is complicated by the presence of errors, which typically lead to ambiguities in the inference of positive clones. However, in many applications there are reasonable models for the prior distributions for positives and for errors, and Bayes inference is the preferred method for ranking candidate positives. Because of the combinatoric complexity of the Bayes formulation, we implemented a decoding algorithm using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. The algorithm was used in screening a library with 1298 clones using 47 pools. We corroborated the posterior probabilities for positives with results from confirmatory screening. We also simulated the screening of a 10-fold coverage library of 33,000 clones using 253 pools. The use of our algorithm, effective under conditions where combinatorial decoding techniques are imprudent, allows the use of fewer pools and also introduces needed robustness.

Algorithms

Efficient pooling designs for library screening.

We describe efficient methods for screening clone libraries, based on pooling schemes that we call "random k-sets designs." In these designs, the pools in which any clone occurs are equally likely to be any possible selection of k from the v pools. The values of k and v can be chosen to optimize desirable properties. Random k-sets designs have substantial advantages over alternative pooling schemes: they are efficient, flexible, and easy to specify, require fewer pools, and have error-correcting and error-detecting capabilities. In addition, screening can often be achieved in only one pass, thus facilitating automation. For design comparison, we assume a binomial distribution for the number of "positive" clones, with parameters n, the number of clones, and c, the coverage. We propose the expected number of resolved positive clones--clones that are definitely positive based upon the pool assays--as a criterion for the efficiency of a pooling design. We determine the value of k that is optimal, with respect to this criterion, as a function of v, n, and c. We also describe superior k-sets designs called k-sets packing designs. As an illustration, we discuss a robotically implemented design for a 2.5-fold-coverage, human chromosome 16 YAC library of n = 1298 clones. We also estimate the probability that each clone is positive, given the pool-assay data and a model for experimental errors.

Binomial Distribution