Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7752139

Updated osteoarthritis reference standard.

Abstract

The Kellgren and Lawrence atlas has been the reference standard for radiographic classification of osteoarthritis (OA) for nearly 40 years. Limitations include employment of a global grade, over-emphasis of the osteophyte, and submergence of other features so measurement of disease progression is difficult. Observer bias, drift, and variability cause concern. To address deficiencies and optimize observer accuracy, precision, and agreement, an updated atlas was created. From a photographic set of clinical radiographs, 4 readers selected a subset by consensus. Major radiographic features of hand, hip, and knee OA are graded on a 4-point scale. Using this atlas, it should be possible to individually score each relevant feature in a given joint. It is hoped the atlas will be adopted for population studies, assessment of disease progression, and protocols that evaluate new agents capable of modifying disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W A Murphy, R D Altman. 1995. Updated osteoarthritis reference standard.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7752139/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].

PURPOSE: Comparison of the imaging capabilities of storage phosphor (computed) radiography and flat plate radiography with conventional film-screen radiography to find new strategies for quality and dose management, i. e., optimizing imaging quality and dose depending on the imaging method and clinical situation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of a CDRAD-phantom, hand-phantom, abdomen-phantom and chest-phantom obtained with different exposure voltages (50 kV, 73 kV, 109 kV) and different speeds (200, 400, 800, 1600) were processed with various digital systems (flat plate detector: Digital Diagnost [Philips]; storage phosphors: ADC-70 [Agfa], ADC-Solo [Agfa], FCR XG 1 [Fuji]) and a conventional film-screen system (HT100G/ Ortho Regular [Agfa]). RESULTS: The evaluation of CDRAD images found the flat plate detector system to have the highest contrast detectability for all dose levels, followed by the FCR XG 1, ADC-Solo and ADC-70 systems. Comparison of the organ-phantom images found the flat plate detector system to be equal to film-screen radiography and especially to storage phosphor systems even for low exposure doses. CONCLUSIONS: Flat plate radiography systems demonstrate the highest potential for high image quality when reducing the exposure dose. Depending on the system generation, the storage phosphor systems also show an improved image quality, but the possibility of a dose reduction is limited in comparison with the flat plate detector system.

Hand↗

Incidence of wrong-site surgery among hand surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, wrong-site surgery had received little attention and had been considered a random, infrequent event. In 1997, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Task Force on Wrong-Site Surgery was formed to determine the incidence of wrong-site surgery and to initiate the "Sign Your Site" campaign. The purpose of our study was to determine the incidence of wrong-site surgery among hand surgeons, elucidate surgeons' practice habits and measures taken to prevent its occurrence, and evaluate the effectiveness of the AAOS "Sign Your Site" campaign. METHODS: One thousand, five hundred and sixty active members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) were polled by mail. Each member received a confidential twenty-nine-question survey. Nonrespondents were sent a second, identical survey. One thousand and fifty (67%) of the surgeons responded. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three surgeons (16%) reported that they had prepared to operate on the wrong site but then noticed the error prior to the incision, and 217 (21%) reported performing wrong-site surgery at least once. Of an estimated 6,700,000 surgical procedures, 242 were performed at the wrong site, an incidence of one in 27,686 procedures. The three most common locations of wrong-site surgery were the fingers (153), hands (twenty), and wrists (twenty-one). Permanent disability occurred in twenty-one patients (9%). Ninety-three cases (38%) led to legal action or monetary settlement. Seventy percent of the responding orthopaedic surgeons were aware of the "Sign Your Site" campaign, and 45% had changed their practice habits as a result. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the AAOS "Sign Your Site" campaign, the issue of wrong-site surgery by hand surgeons had not been addressed. Although wrong-site surgery is rare, 21% of hand surgeons reported performing it at least once during their careers. Since the institution of the "Sign Your Site" campaign, 45% of orthopaedic hand surgeons have changed their practice habits, and almost all routinely take some action to prevent wrong-site surgery.

Hand↗